No Appeal 2 US Supreme Court

 5/15 See today's post that includes information below and new communications to Court Appointed Attorney Logan Perkins. I can't Appeal.

 From:LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>

Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 8:02 AM
To: Logan Perkins <logan@belfastcriminallaw.com>; LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Re: 4th rqst Appeal Trrzng

 

Logan Perkins,

Thank you for the information. Murray denied my motion for recusal, status quo. Sandbagger. I was hoping Matt Pollack could advise of another avenue with that rule. Dead end.

The focus is the appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Here is the link to my post on my blog. 

https://boycottbelfast.blogspot.com/2021/05/appeal-2-us-supreme-court.html

1. Please advise when you will prepare the appeal. 

2. Please motion to dismiss the  disorderly conducts, probation violations, and revoking of bail conditions. There is not any evidence of the disorderly conduct or probation violations. Beyond any doubt. 

3. Please motion to dismiss the competency hearing. I am competent as the email thread proves, please motion to dismiss with this argument from my 4/26/21 email in the thread you have "Today I mailed a continuance motion for all Laurie Allen's Waldo Judicial proceedings to halt pending written direction from Maine Supreme Court Matt Pollack per this email thread. 

From this email thread alone, it is clear that I am extremely competent to defend myself pro Se. Dr. Barter was chosen by the State to find me incompetent is further proof of corruption. 'The model for competency to decide treatment consists of "five steps" of criteria:

1. Reliable diagnosis of a severe mental illness.

2. Without treatment, a short term prognosis of major distress, including "profound anxiety, depression or other painful affects, deterioration of the personality, and proliferation or intensification of symptoms.

3. The availability of treatment is likely to be effective.

4. Incompetency to consent or refuse Trey: and

5. That a reasonable person would accept the treatment offered.

"Psychiatrist and Harvard Law Professor

 Alan Stone offered his 'Thank you Theory for Civil Commitment' Stone 1975 Intended to provide a treatment oriented alternative to a purely dangerous approach, the model keyed on competency- 5 steps.

Stone's Thank you Theory formed the basis for a model Civil Commitment Law endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association of 1982 and published by Stone and attorney Clifford D. Stromberg a year later. (Stromberg and Stone 1983)'

Therefore, this reasonable person that does not and has not presented any mental illness in my 60 year lifetime, further evidenced with current Court ordered psychological evaluation and therapy per conditions of release, 9/2019 by Judge Murray and ADA Entwistle. I chose the best in the State of Maine, Acadia through Northern Lights Medical, Bangor, Maine."

Number one is no severe mental illness. No mental illness period. Precedence set using Stone's model. Beyond Competent, beyond any doubt.

Truly Innocent,

Laurie Allen

  From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>

Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 8:30 PM

To:LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>; Logan@belfastcriminallaw.com <Logan@belfastcriminallaw.com>; The Clooney Foundation For Justice <info@cfj.org> and list

Subject: Re: 4th rqst Appeal Trrzng

 

Logan Perkins,

The appeal is to the US Supreme Court, 1rst amendment constitutional violation. 

Please appeal WALCD-CR-2018-00139 Bench Trial with Judge Robert Murray, finding me guilty of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon for filming my hand while thanking Belfast City Council, City Manager and City Planner for "being my target ya assholes". A "flippant remark" and not a "credible threat". Video below. Judge Robert Murray violated the United States Constitution, my first amendment rights to freedom of speech/expression with precedence, Supreme Court, Watts v United States and reiterated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. See Slate, In The Line of Ire. Can You Shoot An Obama Target. By Jonathan Rapoport. 

https://youtu.be/XrIOrl3qStw              

Truly Innocent,                                  

Laurie Allen

• U.S. Supreme Court appeal. Requests that the highest court in the nation intervene to correct an error on the part of the state courts that violated the U.S. Constitution. 

---

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 7:08 AM
To: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Maine Attorneys Oath To Support The Constitution Of The United States Of America

§806. Attorney's oath

Upon admission to the bar, every applicant shall, in open court, take and subscribe an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this State, and take the following oath, or, in the case of an applicant conscientiously scrupulous of taking an oath, such applicant shall make appropriate affirmations to the same effect:   [PL 1975, c. 66, §5 (AMD).]

"You solemnly swear that you will do no falsehood nor consent to the doing of any in court, and that if you know of an intention to commit any, you will give knowledge thereof to the justices of the court or some of them that it may be prevented; you will not wittingly or willingly promote or sue any false, groundless or unlawful suit nor give aid or consent to the same; that you will delay no man for lucre or malice, but will conduct yourself in the office of an attorney within the courts according to the best of your knowledge and discretion, and with all good fidelity, as well as to the courts, as to your clients. So help you God."  

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1975, c. 66, §5 (AMD).