August 6, 2019 Motion for complete 3 Discoveries from ADA Entwisle

State of Maine v. Laurie Allen

CR-2017-00839 Harassment

CR-2017-00862 Harassment

CR-2018-00139 Terrorizing with a dangerous weapon

Waldo Court Clerk Brooke Otis,

Please accept this 7 page motion and 27 pages of emails to court appointed Tom Shehan for complete discoveries and clarifications that were never delivered. Instead Shehan motioned to withdraw. Therefore, as pro se, Laurie Allen motions for 3 complete discoveries with numbered pages on each at no charge. This motion and 27 pages were emailed to ADA Entwisle 8/6/2019 @ 1:06pm.

At the 8/7/2019 docket hearing the Judge will have previous motions that Judge Davis chose not to hear at the dispositional conference on 7/23/19 regardless of receipt on 7/17/19. These motions and notarized affidavits were received at the Waldo Judiciary Center, 11 Market St. Att. County Clerk Brooke Otis, 7/17/19 @ 8:35am via USPS tracking # EL719332803US, costing me $25.50 to mail out from the Searsport post office yesterday in case my rights to the Waldo Judiciary Center were denied.

1. Motion to dismiss without prejudice title 14 sec 556 Terrororizing With A Dangerous Weapon CR-2018-00139 (20 pages) with notarized Affidavit (17 pages).

2. Motion to dismiss without prejudice title 14 sec 556 Harassment CR-2017-00862 (18 pages) with notarized Affidavit (17 pages).

3. Motion to dismiss without prejudice title 14 sc 556 Harassment CR-2017-00839 (13 pages) with notarized Affidavit (17 pages).

4. Motion for bench trial if dismissal denied (1 page).

5, Motion to rescind/amend bail conditions, ankle shackle, travel restrictions, daily check in, and bail refund. (1 page)

6. Motion to void all cease harassment and trespass notices issued to Laurie Allen (1 page).

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:13 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Basis for Harassment Charges

Laurie -

I email you at your request to answer two questions. I am not going to send it to anyone other than you as I feel I must protect the confidentiality of the attorney client privilege. If you release it to anyone that is your business. I have nothing to say about that.

The state has brought two charges of Harassment (class E). The first charge is under Docket No. WACD-CR-2017-839. The complaint in this docket number lists an offense date of November 1, 2017. The complaint reads: "On or about November 1, 2017, in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen, without reasonable cause, did engage in course of conduct with the intent to harass, torment,
2/7
or threaten Mark A. Rae, after having been forbidden to do so by a sheriff, sheriff deputy, constable or police officer or justice of the peace or by a protective order issued under Title 5, §4654 or 4655 or Title 19-A § 4006 or 4007."
In the narrative portion of the Discovery, Officer Travis Spencer of the Belfast Police Department wrote "When I came in to start my shift at 18:00, Sgt. Cook received a tex from Sgt. Gibbs that was [sic] a video from Mark Rae; [sic] This video contained footage of who I knew as Laurie Allen via her voice harassing either Mark or one of Mark's employee's about the property lines. The property was surveyed and Mark placed a stake on his side of the property where Laurie pulled the stake out and threw it him nearly hitting him. See attached video."

I spoke with ADA Entwisle who stated that the video was not able to be copied. He feels it no longer exists.

The second Harassment charge was brought under Docket No. WALCD-CR-2017-862. The alleged date of this offense is October 17,2017. The name of the victim is Mark A. Rae. The complaint charges as follows:

"On or about October 17, 2017 in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen,without reasonable cause did engage in a course of conduct with the intent to harass, torment or threaten Mark A. Rae, after having forbidden to do so by a sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable or police officer or a justice of the peace or by a court in a protective order issued under Title 5, Sec. 4654 or 4655 or Title 19-A Sec 4006 or 4007.

There is no narrative in the Discovery that I have received about this incident.

In answer to the question why you were arrested on November 1, 2017, I have no answer. Courts generally give police officers discretion to arrest individuals if the officer believes that he or she has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and the person they are arresting committed it.

There is no narrative in the Discovery that I have so far received relating to this incident. I have asked ADA Entwisle for the law enforcement officer's narrative.

Tom

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 6:32 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion for Discovery of all 3 chargesRe: Notice Hearing

Tom,

3/7

Thank you for responding. Please motion for discovery of all three charges. We agree that pages are missing from the harassment discoveries.'Advise when you will do this and confirm that you will email them .

Laurie

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 12:03 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Notice Hearing

1. I am saying what I have told you already. I received discovery from Lisa Whittier. I sent that to you. I recently asked ADA Entwisle to have the secretary in the office email me the complete discovery for the Criminal Threatening with a Dangerous Weapon charge as I was not sure I had all of it.

2. I am not going to do this. As I mentioned to you in an earlier email the docket number the DA places on the cover page has no substantive significance. Criminal Defendants and Criminal Lawyers acting on their behalf do have legal recourse to get discovery that the DA has but has not sent. It is called a Motion for Discovery.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 5:29 PM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Re: 4th request Re: Confusing Hrsmnt DiscoveriesRe: Allen

Tom,

Please don't respond to this in piecemeal fashion. When you have final answers with responses from ADA Entwisle on all the red, please respond next to each one in blue font and then send it to me. I reject the email you sent @ 4:26 where you state you respond to some. Thank you.

Truly Innocent

Laurie

4/7

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:13 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: 4th request Re: Confusing Hrsmnt DiscoveriesRe: Allen

Tom,

Since you did not respond to my original email thread from Saturday, 6/15/2019 as requested, I have pasted your 6/20/19 4:30pm response repeating information you have given me which prompted my 6/15/2019 email for Entwisle's confusing discoveries for 2 harassment charges.

Text in red is for you to respond to.

1. Separately list EACH harassment charge with the date I was forced to sign the notice and the evidence given for the Belfast Police Department to ISSUE EACH NOTICE.

2. List the date of summons, the date of issue for which notice, the date of violation, the evidence, the court date and the corresponding docket number.

3. List the date of arrest, the date of issue for which notice, the date of violation, the evidence, the court date and the corresponding docket number.

4. Your email from Friday, 6/14/2019 @ 4:24pm , PDF discovery ref CR-17-839 , 10 pages 9 are numbered plus the ADA's Cover Sheet making 10 that you sent to me. The cover letter states "enclosed are pages 1-13. of discovery materials to the above captioned case that does not reference the case docket. It states "DOCKET NO: CR-17-?? "

A. Please have the ADA put the full docket number, the court date was December 8, 2017- is that the date that should be on his discovery instead of December 6, 2017? If so correct. The last page in your PDF has a handwritten circled 9. Where are pages 10, 11, 12 and 13? Advise when you will send me the corrected page with the full docket number, possible date change and pages 10,11,12 and 13.

B. This discovery should be for fabricated violation summons on 10/23/17 of the fabricated cease harassment notice issued to me on 9/7/2017 where I was never given my original signed notice as mandated. Citing a fabricated video that Officer Guba found on my youtube on 9/7/2017 swearing at Mark Rae and workers on his property and offered Mark Rae a cease harassment notice against me. Where is that video evidence? The report cites another fabricated video that "We were unable to copy the video but clearly was Laurie Allen harassing them." Summons #3157439, included in discovery, served to me on 10/23/17 with a court date on 12/8/17. On page 2 of the Deputy Report for Incident B17-6198 it states:

11/13/17 Arrest Booking#J17-01194 Arrest/Offense

5/7

11/13/17 Law Incident Harassment B17-5361 Sister complaint

11/13/17 Law Incident Harassment B17-6522 Sister complaint

10/17/17 Name Rae, Mark A Complainant

10/17/17 Name Allen, Laurie, L Suspect

10/17/17 Name Page, Kevin L Witness

10/17/17 Cad Call 14:45:56 10/17/17 Violation PO Initiating Call

The report is not credible. It makes no sense. I included it now for clarity of fabrication and ease of reference. Once you respond to above red I will question this report in it's entirety.

5. The 2nd discovery packet has 2 ADA cover sheets.

A. The first is dated December 6, 2017 and references Docket No. CR-17-862 and states "Enclosed are pages 1-13 of discovery materials in reference to the above captioned case." Another ADA cover page dated February 23,2018 and does not reference the docket number "DOCKET NO: CR-17???"What is the docket number for this 2/23/18 cover sheet and confirm that the 12/6/2017 cover sheet docket no. CR-17-862 is correct.

B. Stating enclosed are pages 14-20 of discovery materials in reference. The pages with the hand written circle 1-9 and appear to be part of the 13 pages referenced on the cover page for CR-17-862.Are 4 pages missing? Advise and send if applicable. My blog pages are not evidence and ADA Entwisle had stated in a previous hearing that these blog pages are no longer part of the discovery. The circle pages are 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 totaling 6 pages. Making a total of 15 pages in the PDF for this mess of the 2nd? harassment charge.

C. Page 8 is "Belfast Police Department Court Officers Worksheet Case No. B17-6522, Date of Incident: 11/01/2017 ARRESTED:YES SUMMONSED:YES Offense 1)Harassment Title: 17-A.506-A Class: E SEQ:N/A ATN/CTN:N/A Court Date 12/22/1017

On the first day of November, 2017, Officer Travis Spencer of the Belfast Police Department, being a duly sworn full time City of Belfast Police Officer, arrested Laurie Allen for harassment. The information that pertains ti this complaint are as follows:

When I came in to start my shift at 18:00, Sgt. Cook received a text from Sgt. Gibbs that was a video from Mark Rae; This video contained footage of who I knew as Laurie Allen via her voice harassing either Mark of one of Mark's employee's about property lines. The property was surveyed and Mark placed a stake on his side of the property where Laurie pulled the stake out and threw it at him nearly hitting him. See attached video.

6/7

informed her of the situation at and and that she was being arrested. I was able to arrest Laurie and transport her to corrections without issue.

While there, Laurie saw served with multiple criminal trespass notices and a harassment notice for Michael Hurley. Laurie did sign all the notices without issue. See attached files for more details on the issue."

This worksheet is not credible. I was not giving the original signed notices as mandated, nor was I given copies as the officers told Ryan Otis at bail. You stated he does not recall this. Consistent with fabrication. Where is the video evidence on Sgt. Gibbs phone from Mark Rae? Mark Rae and Sgt Gibbs each had this video evidence to arrest me. One must be available. Mark Rae does not have a survey as proven in court in May 2018 when Deputy Chief Judge Susan Sparaco asked Mark Rae to produce the survey. Mark Rae stated in sworn testimony that he did not have the survey and has not seen the survey. Belfast Police Department Chief McFadden's 9/5/2017 email (below) with overwhelming REAL video I provided and also in this email of harassment, terrorizing, destruction of property, threats, etc. from 23 Seaview Terrace, Mark Rae/Cameron Family and workers.

Chief McFadden would not grant me a cease harassment notice that I requested many times from 5/2017-9/2017 "As far as your repeated requests to have your neighbors issued harassment notices along with the real estate agents who sold the property, I would explain that the Belfast Police Department does have the authority to issue harassment notices, however we do so if/when we're able to determine harassing conduct is present. I have reviewed the videos you've posted to your YouTube channel regarding the alleged harassing behavior and find no behavior on your neighbors part that would justify a harassment notice being served on them."

and states "As with most if not all boundary line disputes the actual situation cannot be resolved by the police due to the fact that we have no authority over boundary lines. "

Proof that Chief McFadden is protecting criminal activity from 23 Seaview Terrace and is using authority over boundary lines ignoring my survey and original subdivision plans for Seaview Terrace the Judge Sparaco viewed and issued me a protection order against Mark Rae May 2018. Upheld by the Maine Supreme Court denying Mark Rae's appeal.https://www.courts.maine.gov/opinions_orders/supreme/lawcourt/2019/19me053.pdf

It is clear that the State has no evidence for the harassment charges and the charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon is absolutely Freedom of Speech/Expression. BEYOND ANY DOUBT!

7/7

To continue with this farce is at great expense to me and taxpayers. I would suggest that the State drop all charges immediately, apply a Title 14 Sect 556 Special Motion to dismiss, clearing my record.

Please respond to the red immediately or respond all dismissed.

Truly Innocent,

Laurie Allen

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 4:30 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Harassment Discovery

Laurie -

I sent these to you before by means of forwarding an email from Megan Duval, (DA Secretary) on June 12th with these packets of Discovery. I also have sent you that ADA Entwisle wrote that the video referenced in the November 1st incident would not copy and is no longer available.

Tom

Signed,

Laurie Allen

Pro se

Included witht eh 8/6/10 Motion for Discoveries

Page 1/27

8/6/19

Emails requesting complete discoveries and bench trial if not dismissed for 2 2017 harassment charges and 1 2018 charge terrorizing with a dangerous weapon to court appointed attorney Tom Shehan from 5/18/2019 – 7/12/2018 where Tom Shehan motions to withdraw, never providing the discoveries.

Motion for Discoveries

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 6:34 AM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Pls Mail 3 Discoveries

Hi Tom,

Please mail the 3 complete discoveries to me on Monday 5/20/19. I must review them thoroughly before our meeting on Friday, 5/24/19, 10:30am at the Waldo County Judicial Center. Thank you.

Truly True,

Laurie Allen

17 Seaview Terrace

Belfast, Me. 04915

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 6:50 PM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Harvard Law/MaliceRe: Mcfdn email to Megan Re: 2012 emailRe: Pleaded not guilty/McFdn email to MeganFw: McFadden Hacking/Rape Ring?

McFadden sent out the video not me. Dismiss. This Harvard Law and Malice definition proves there is no case.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 9:28 AM
To: laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>; Governor <Governor@maine.gov>; chief@belfastmepd.org <chief@belfastmepd.org>; Jeffrey Trafton <sheriff@waldocountyme.gov>; Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; georgeallen99 <georgeallen99@msn.com>; attorney.general@maine.gov <attorney.general@maine.gov>
Cc: comments@mainepublic.org <comments@mainepublic.org>; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com <glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com>; ethankingcole@gmail.com <ethankingcole@gmail.com>; einstein@toast.net <einstein@toast.net>; haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk <haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk>; humblefarmer@midcoast.com <humblefarmer@midcoast.com>; aobrien@freepressonline.com

2/27

<aobrien@freepressonline.com>; wabi@wabi.tv <wabi@wabi.tv>; mstewart@ap.org <mstewart@ap.org>; news@pressherald.com <news@pressherald.com>; news@villagesoup.com <news@villagesoup.com>; news@penbaypilot.com <news@penbaypilot.com>; Senator Susan Collins <susan@collins.senate.gov>; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov <erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov>; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov <scheduling_king@king.senate.gov>; mayor@cityofbelfast.org <mayor@cityofbelfast.org>
Subject: 453rd day shackling Mom 1rst Amnd Innocent

Governor Janet Trafton Mills, Waldo County Sheriff Jeffrey Trafton, Belfast Chief Michael McFadden, and Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey,

The State of Maine continues to keep me, Laurie Allen, a 58 year old, single, below poverty level (18k), Mom shackled for the 453rd day. The State of Maine charges me $5 a day for this shackle invading my health and privacy of my home that I rarely leave. The zoning restrictions are barbaric. I have never had a record. I have never been arrested prior to the beginning of fabricated harassment charges after 9/5/2017 by Chief McFadden. Chief McFadden's final refusal to grant me protection through a cease harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace, Mark Rae, family and workers for numerous crimes and terrorizing since May 2017 with overwhelming video documentation. However, Judge Susan Sparaco granted me a protection order from Mark Rae in 5/2018 with evidence, survey and original plans proving my property lines where Mark Rae did not have a survey as claimed, Mark Rae's theft of my property where Chief McFadden ignored repeated requests to take my report of Mark Rae's theft with picture proof. Mark Rae appealed to the Maine Supreme Court to overturn my pro se protection order. Rae was denied.

(below is a portion of proof from my blog)

There is hope. The Maine Supreme Court upheld my protection order against Mark Rae.

https://www.courts.maine.gov/opinions_orders/supreme/lawcourt/2019/19me053.pdf

dDLVg6ftsRI

Kevin Page from Swanville? There's a Karen Page, asst. Waldo County Judiciary Court Clerk- relation? Court Clerk Brooke Otis to Waldo Bailiff Ryan Otis- relation? All In The Family. JustUs.

Here's another short video on 1/8/2018 with Rae's worker, Kevin Page cursing at me with fuck and calling me a retard while shoveling snow onto my property. https://youtu.be/bGkl9cEx1so

(end of blog portion)

Chief McFadden offered them illegal cease harassment against me and then fabricated charges and fabricated evidence that is not available per ADA Entwisle's discovery. Chief McFadden continues with

3/27

his power to stalk my youtube channel and to fabricate another arrest (3rd) on 2/23/2018 and arresting me for terrorizing with a dangerous weapon for a legal freedom of speech October 2017 target shoot per the first amendment cited below without malice. I did not sent this video to anyone or post it anywhere except on my playlist for John and Me. I have other playlists for corruption, Chief McFadden sent the video to the global media with lies from City Manager Joe Slocum and others to persecute me on 2/23/18. I read that downtown Belfast had a social media party upon my arrest. The comments were horrendous.

Bail was set at 25k . All know I did not have 25k and ordered that outrageous amount to place me into jail for 7 days. The bail was reduced to 5k (I am sure no one knew that I did have 5k) and Waldo Jail would not take the bail payment from my friend in person on Weds. 2/28, Thrs. 3/1, or Fri., 3/2. On Friday morning, 3/2 as my friend was trying to pay the 5k bail without success, the transport officer walked passed him and told him that he was going to get me out of Two Bridges Correctional Facility now. The Waldo jail had yet to take the bail. I have been brutally shackled and restricted since 3/2/18 as rapists go free.

I've yet to hear the 3 charges in court after numerous dispositional conferences as pro se since the first hearing with Judge Mathews on 12/8/2017 where I was not allowed to be heard for dismissal, pushed into dispostional conferences galore and getting nowhere. At every hearing Judge Robert Murray, Judge Mathews, and Judge Fowle telling me to get an attorney, these are serious charges. Yes they are and false.

This has forced me into taking a court appointed attorney, Tom Shehan. I have another dispositional conference, Tuesday, 6/11/2019 @ 10:30am where all 3 charges should finally be dismissed. Continuing this fabrication into a trial is an enormous injustice and cost. If that is the course, I request a trial by Judge only and for bail and restrictions to be rescinded immediately.

Rick Otto, my pretrial case manager and Sheriff Trafton have yet to respond to my 6/5 email to grant permission to travel into the restricted entire downtown zone for my 6/11/2019 hearing @ the Waldo Judiciary Center. Without email written permission (received from Rick Otto for previous hearings) I could be arrested again. Please have Rick Otto or Sheriff Trafton respond to my email request.

Truly Innocent,

Laurie Allen

17 Seaview Terrace

Belfast, Maine 04915

(Maine Public Broadcasting Network VP/Content Charles Beck is my neighbor. I would welcome an interview from MPBN or any media and would think shackling a law abiding American

4/27

woman to break and demoralize for even one day is news, 453 days is deadly for me. My father @56, sister @54 and 2 brothers @ 65 & 67 ALL died from cancer. This gps cancer cell tracker on my skin is cancerous. )

from my blog www.boycottbelfast.blogspot.com

https://bangordailynews.com/2011/12/20/news/midcoast/new-belfast-police-chief-selected/

New Belfast police chief selected
By Abigail Curtis, BDN Staff
Posted Dec. 20, 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
Belfast native Michael McFadden III, who worked for the Belfast Police Department for 19 years before joining the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit.McFadden, who joined the Computer Crimes Unit two yeas ago, is well-placed to do that, Slocum said.While there, the former Belfast Police Department detective investigatedI nternet pornography cases.

PeterTaber •

A sad choice. This knuckle-dragging thug doesn't have any trouble lying shamelessly if het thinks it might gain a conviction. His father, a longtime Belfast police officer who merited wide respect, must be spinning in his grave at how his son turned out. Of course, take this opinion as you might.I was only a police reporter for over 40 years, can hardly be called a cop-hater, and yet I witnessed first-hand how low-down he has behaved.

maine_seashore •

He physically beats false confessions out of people being arrested...just ask Mike Hall ;)

Peter Taber, now activist and owner of https://searsportshores.com/

(My attorney should be advising me. There may be even more law on my side but how would I know?)

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:08 AM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Dismiss All Charges Re: Harvard Law/Malice

Tom,

It appears that all that is needed for complete dismissal of all charges,2 harassment and one terrorizing with a dangerous weapon is in #1 and #2 of this email. The rest of the thread is more proof as is the other documents that I have given you but they are not necessary.
5/27
Please advise before the dispositional conference on 6/11/2019. I have yet to receive that notice. There is no reason for this to go to trial, correct?

1. Dismiss 2 Harassment Charges. I don't even know what the 2nd one is. Please identify this 2nd charge with the evidence. The first charge states I harassed Mark Rae per a video that is not available. Furthermore, dismissal should be automatic since I was never given my original signed cease harassment notice as mandated on the form. I've been reporting this to the Waldo Jail officers, bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed non receipt of notices on 11/1/2017 confirming that the notices were not on my personal belongings list and questioned the officers. They said they were getting me copies. A lie. I have been reporting the same to the courts (video's and transcripts available) since the December 2017. Belfast Chief McFadden ignored email requests and after I got permission to go to the police department (I am restricted from the entire downtown) the window clerk could not find the notices on her computer. Officer Guba came out and told me that I would not be getting the original notices. He had other papers that I did not accept or take.

2. Dismiss terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.Belfast Police Chief McFadden went into my you tube account and sent out my 10/2017 innocent freedom of expression target shoot video. I did not send this video to anyone and I did not post this video anywhere, including my blogs until after McFadden sent it out globally with the AP media. According to the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution my target shoot video posted to my you tube account is legal.

https://cyber.harvard.edu/ilaw/Speech/

Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance."
However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.

Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . .." But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines would go as follows:

If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."

6/27

If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."

A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.

Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is permitted are constitutional if and only if:

they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;

they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and

they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."

On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose of the property in question.

Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:

1. Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited.

2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be prohibited.

3. Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited.

4. Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children.

5. Defamatory statements may be prohibited. (In other words, the making of such statements may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.) However, if the target of the defamation is a "public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice."
If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity.

6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or
directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is
reasonably necessary.

7/27
https://thelawdictionary.org/malice/
What is MALICE?

In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser, 4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart regardless of social duty and fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act includes the willful doing of it. Malice includes intent and will. State v. Bobbins. 06 Me. 328. For other definitions see Shannon v. Jones, 70 Tex. 141. 13 S. W. 477; Williams v. Williams. 20 Colo. 51. 37 Pac. 014; Smith v. Railroad Co., 87 Md. 48. 3S Atl. 1072; In re Freche (D. C.) 109 Fed. 621 ; Craft v. State, 3 Kan. 486; Lewis v. Chapman. 10 N. Y. 309; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475.21 S. W. 193; State v. Witt. 34 Kan. 488. 8 Pac. 709; State v. Walker, 9 Houst. tDel.) 404, 33 Atl. 227; Cotton v. State. 32 Tex. 014; Com. v. Chance, 174 Mass. 245. 54 N. E. 551.75 Am. St. Rep. 306. In the law of libel and slander. An evil intent or motive arising from spite or ill will; personal hatred or ill will; culpable recklessness or a willful and wanton disregard of the rights and interests of the per- ) MALICE son defamed. McDonald v. Brown, 23 R. I. 546, 51 Atl. 213, 58 L. R. A. 768, 91 Am. St. Rep. 659; Hearne v. De Young, 132 Cal. 357, 64 Pac. 576; Cherry v. Des Moines Leader, 114 Iowa, 298, 86 N. W. 323, 54 L R. A. 855, 89 Am. St. Rep. 365; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 73 S. W. 668
TLD Example: The defense attorney successfully proved to the jury that his client acted without malice when he broke into the vacant cabin to escape the snow and freezing temperatures.

10/2017 Target Shoot You tube video
https://youtu.be/XrIOrl3qStw

First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever.
@ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot.I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will.
@1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said.

8/27

@2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright.
@3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye.

The lying Republican Journal/Waldo Village Soup and the DA at court hearings made a big deal about being a "High powered scoped rifle" trying to use the 9 shots as me planning 9 shots for each of the officials.

@3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "
John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.)" I did it. I did it. 9 9 9.I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some." I did not even mention their names, I was just shooting the target. I said it after, it certainly was innocent. Not even premeditated. Just stupid banter.

@6:11I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marshall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me." John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.)

Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl?He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear
with these little peanuts. Alright bye."

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen

Belfast Commerce awards resident abuser City Manager Joe Slocum- 2013 CITIZEN OF THE YEAR - BoycottBelfast.blogspot.com Take Rape Break Intake 4 JustUs More More More

Each time I leave my home there is a chance that I will not return. They have driven nails into my tires, vandalized my boat, trailer, steal personal property, destroy my property, hate crimes, the list goes on.There is no one that would notice that I am not home until possibly days later leaving my beagles home alone.

www.boycottbelfast.blogspot.com

9/27

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2019 8:52 AM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Pleaded not guilty/McFdn email to MeganFw: McFadden Hacking/Rape Ring?

You're welcome.

(Here's another short video on 1/8/2018 with Rae's worker, Kevin Page cursing at me with fuck and calling me a retard while shoveling snow onto my property. https://youtu.be/bGkl9cEx1so )

FYI- At my first hearing on 12/8/2017 for 1 charge of harassment Judge Mathews would not allow me to be heard for dismissal due to the fact that I didn't get my original signed notice. Immediate dismissal. He then said the 2nd harassment hearing on 12/28/2017 could be heard at the dispositional conference in 1/9/2019. He was leading me. I had never heard of this dispositional conference and could not argue against it, nor argue to be heard fearing contempt of court. I said OK. Then he asked me if it goes to trial do I want a Judge or jury. I said jury all the way but that was before I got slammed with terrorizing and the media went global. I had come back to the court clerks after I thought about it and that I didn't even get to plead not guilty to the 2nd charge, I didn't even know what it was for. Neither did the court clerk Melissa? and she could not find the not guilty plea in this video for even the 12/8/2017 hearing. She finally calls Brooke Otis over and Brooke is on CYA but I didn't know it yet.

Brooke states not guilty was entered in the clerks notes which isn't a legal document and confused me into accepting bullshit. . https://youtu.be/ZwJDTeXzs_4

12/27/17 Judge Mathews Belfast Me. Your clerk exposed your filth. Ew.

youtu.be

You said yesterday that you will request a trial by Judge because of the media. Please do. Downtown had a social media party upon the Republican Journal reporting my arrest on 2/23/18 as well.

https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2016/06/tim-lynch-trial-judge/

Still, there are circumstances in which the accused may wish to take his case to a judge. Any case that has generated intense media coverage runs a risk that at least some jurors harbor some partial opinions before the case has begun. Even if jurors have not been following the news reports, some may not be able to withstand pressures from the community to render the conviction that some protesters and local activists demand.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 1:17 PM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Subject: Mcfdn email to xxxxx Re: 2012 emailRe: Pleaded not guilty/McFdn email to mmmmmFw: McFadden Hacking/Rape Ring?

This one too where McFadden goes after my daughter to get me into a psych hospital and states I pose no harm to anyone. Entwisle with the Title 15.

10/27

From: Michael McFadden <chief@belfastmepd.org>

Subject: RE: Regarding Laurie Allen

Date: October 20, 2017 at 7:35:35 AM PDT

To: xxxxx

To Laurie’s Daughter,

Thank you so much for reaching out. It's been obvious to me for a number of years that your mom is suffering from untreated mental illness. There are a couple of things that prevent me from being an effective part in addressing those issues for her. First and foremost, it's my strong opinion that your mother would not be willing to seek treatment voluntarily. I have engaged her in conversation a few years ago when she would actually speak with me, and she was highly offended that I was even suggesting she should try speaking with someone. I may be wrong, but there's nothing she's done or said in the last 5 years that I've known her, which would indicate that I am wrong. Second absent her agreeing to accept help, we would be forced to take her into protective custody involuntarily in order to have a physiological evaluation done. In order for me to do this I would first have to determine she is a danger to herself or someone else. At this time I don't feel I can argue effectively that she presents an actual danger to herself or others. She's created considerable inconvenience to a number of people but she has also been very careful not to overtly threaten them. I have a tremendous amount of experience dealing with individuals suffering from mental illness, and although your mother is struggling she simply isn't going to meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization in the typical way. Ultimately however, it's my strong belief that hospitalization is exactly what your mother needs.

I would agree that your mother's condition has deteriorated in the last several months. She's made numerous comments recently about her alcohol consumption, and I'm left to wonder if the addition of regular drinking is in some way contributing to the decline we're both noticing in her behavior, having no idea if this is a new development or not it's hard to say how much of an affect if any her drinking is having on the situation though.

This situation is not a typical one. Unfortunately the people who are best positioned to help your mother are the very people she's convinced are evil and out to get her. I know this is part of her mental illness and I personally take no offense to the things she says because of that. But my fear is that she simply won't trust me nor any of the officers here. She's also convinced the hospital along with the doctors and administrators of it are corrupt as well.

Honestly in evaluating the entire situation I believe her family (you and your brother) may be the best people at this time to get her the help she needs. I would suggest speaking with someone at Maine Behavioral Healthcare (207-338-2295) to see what options are there for you. I'm more than happy to assist you in whatever way you think I might be able to. It might be beneficial for you to mention that I'd be more than happy to talk with any of the case workers who you speak with at MBH, sometimes it makes a difference if they understand the background and type of behavior we're seeing from a public safety point of view.

11/27

If you'd like to speak with me directly please feel free to call (207-338-5255)

I do appreciate you contacting me and I hope my response is of some help.

Chief McFadden.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 12:58 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: 2012 emailRe: Pleaded not guilty/McFdn email to MeganFw: McFadden Hacking/Rape Ring?

If this goes to trail this is important to prove it's political and over reaching to silence my freedom of speech. Today's post on my blog-

5/27/19 Chief McFadden, his police, Belfast City Council, City Manager and City Planner have targeted me for 8 years and counting for exposing corruption to my property and downtown that goes beyond Belfast to MaineHealth and the State of Maine. Against me for 8 years.

Stalking my blogs and you tube channel to take a private video that I did not share with anyone or post on my blog, to arrest, disgrace and silence me for their political corruption.Since May 2017 the Cameron/Rae/LaCombe, Belfast City Council, City Hall and Belfast Police Department have broken law after law to take 15 feet of my property to break me. Unablethey found my 1 time 10/2017 target innocent target shoot, thanking Belfast City Council,City Manager and City Planner for being my target. It was private. If Chief McFadden would have called me in for another "talk" like he did in 2012 when City Council called my in as a threat for an innocent email that included the words "blow up", I would have been cleared.

(click the page link below for more JustUs)
http://belfastbullies.blogspot.com/p/my-council-in-total-denial-and-reports.html
(from my first blog www.belfastbullies.blogspot.com. Then the downtownChamber of Commerce forced me into
calling for a boycott of downtown. Hence, www.boycottbelfast.com began)

12/27
To: ward1councilor@cityofbelfast.org
Subject: Failure of Man
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:45:51 -0500

Marina,

Just now on Sunday Morning, Brad Pitt spoke about his help to New Orleans. He said nothing makes him

angrier than hearing that the devastation was due to an "Act of God" when it is the "Failure of Man".

Deja Vu.

Looking the other way through rose colored glasses is open invitation for those who have other ways.

Someone has to fight back- you are not willing to see it and that is dangerous since you are Council.

It is difficult and crushing while you support evil dealings and that has happened to other residents.

However, they don't have the money to fight back or the strength. You will see,

I hope you will try before it blows up.

Sincerely,

Laurie

From: mpercival@midmaine.com

Subject: Re: Failure of Man
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:22:06 -0500

Dear Chief and Marina,

I wanted to thank the Chief for reaching out to me on 1/30/12 in regards to the email below. I want to

clarify the email and put Marina at ease. I meant that it is dangerous for ME that Marina does not see

or acknowledge that I feel threatened because of the verbal discrediting/slander broadcast on TV from

Mike Hurley, Joe Slocum and Wayne Marshall.

I meant that I will continue to make this very public until resolution ( hence, before it blows up). I have

been trying since May to handle this with dignity and honesty. At minimum, it would have been professional

and ethical for the slander and discrediting against me to have been publicly retracted as I requested and

was denied. For the record, I will forward those communications from Mike Hurley and me.

I did express concern for my safety yesterday to the Chief. Mike Hurley had no right to place me in jeopardy.
13/27

I should have contacted the Chief of Police immediately but didn't want to cause further friction.

Sincerely,

Laurie
_____________________________

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 10:36 AM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Dismiss All Charges Re: Harvard Law/Malice

Tom,

You should have received my email to Gov. Mills, Sheriff Trafton, Chief McFadden and AG Frey. Please write up the motion to dismiss all charges of at least refusal to give me original signed notices as mandated proving falsifying and !rst Amendment rights and that McFadden sent out the video to incite terror and another false arrest.

These pages you sent are useless information. You can't even find the 2nd CH charge information and evidence. Dismiss. This is so stupid.

McFadden refuses to respond to the cease harassment notice that I formally filed in the BPD on 9/1/2017 after he refused to respond to my emails and face to face with Officer Rolerson on my property for a cease harassment against Rae/Cameron/family, workers on 23 Seaview Terrace. He finally responded that he would not be issuing a CH based on the proof and instead offered one to them.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>

Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 4:09 PM

To: LAURIE ALLEN; Michael McFadden

Cc: same as above

Subject: Per attached 6 months of terror, issue Cease Harassment Notice/All & Agent 23 Seaview Terrace

Belfast Police Chief Mike McFadden,

Per the attached frightening terrorism that you support and encourage, please issue a cease harassment notice against all owners (Rae Trust and such) against 23 Seaview Terrace, Belfast Maine, 04915. Please copy and email me the notice that I have been begging for 6 months and counting. Please respond by 5pm today.

14/27

Sincerely,

Laurie Allen

LAURIE ALLEN

Thu 9/7/2017 4:43 PM

To:

attorney.general@maine.gov;
LAURIE ALLEN

Cc:

glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com


Maine Attorney General Janet Mills,
Terrorizing below, I was just served with a cease harassment order by 2 cars of the Belfast Police against the owners of 23 Seaview Terrace, Belfast. If I do not receive a response from you by 5:30 pm, 9/7/17 I will take actions.

Laurie Allen

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 9:46 AM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Dismiss All Charges Re: Harvard Law/Malice

Laurie -

In answer to your question I attach 9 pages which seem to relate to the Harassment charges. I am contacting ADA Entwisle to see if there is more there. My question to you is there is a page titled "CEASE HARASSMENT NOTICE". There is a proof of service on the page stating that you received the notice on 9/7/17 with your signature below. Were you served with this notice on that date?

Tom

15/27

I am preparing the motion for you to be taken off the ankle bracelet and the prohibited zones be done away with today.

On Thursday, June 6, 2019, 6:41:01 PM EDT, LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com> wrote:

Tom,

The November 1, 2017 charge is for what? I don't see any report in the discovery stating the event and evidence- do you? That is the night they arrested me for the first one on a video that is not available. I told you that when they brought me into the jail they had me sign a slew of cease harassment charges from Belfast PD, Belfast City Hall, Mike Hurley and his theater. Then they told me that I had violated the Mike Hurley one where I had just signed it and got a 2nd arrest that night. They never gave me the notices and Bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed that I did not get them.

Now none of those are on record and this one is new with this discovery. All these hearings and the charges were never presented by ADA Entwisle.

New sign at my house. I walked up Route 1 into Hannaford today with my big sign BOYCOTTBELFAST.BLOGSPOT.COM on my back. Exercise and Freedom of Speech. I do.

All 3 charges are proven false and my video is legal per the First Amendment cited in this thread, glaringly #5 "However if the target of the defamation is a "public figure " she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice". McFadden SENT out the video. I want this presented to the Judge on 6/11/2019 regardless of ADA Entwisle. The Judge makes the decision to dismiss or not. If no, make sure to state that I want a trial by Judge and rescind bail conditions immediately on 6/11/2019.

McFadden is guilty of malice. He incites terror and stalked my youtube to find this legal target shoot and have me falsely arrested to be silenced for good.

Thank you.

Laurie

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:13 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Basis for Harassment Charges

16/27

Laurie -

The state has brought two charges of Harassment (class E). The first charge is under Docket No. WACD-CR-2017-839. The complaint in this docket number lists an offense date of November 1, 2017. The complaint reads: "On or about November 1, 2017, in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen, without reasonable cause, did engage in course of conduct with the intent to harass, torment, or threaten Mark A. Rae, after having been forbidden to do so by a sheriff, sheriff deputy, constable or police officer or justice of the peace or by a protective order issued under Title 5, §4654 or 4655 or Title 19-A § 4006 or 4007."
In the narrative portion of the Discovery, Officer Travis Spencer of the Belfast Police Department wrote "When I came in to start my shift at 18:00, Sgt. Cook received a text from Sgt. Gibbs that was [sic] a video from Mark Rae; [sic] This video contained footage of who I knew as Laurie Allen via her voice harassing either Mark or one of Mark's employee's about the property lines. The property was surveyed and Mark placed a stake on his side of the property where Laurie pulled the stake out and threw it him nearly hitting him. See attached video."

I spoke with ADA Entwisle who stated that the video was not able to be copied. He feels it no longer exists.

There is no narrative in the Discovery that I have received about this incident.

There is no narrative in the Discovery that I have so far received relating to this incident. I have asked ADA Entwisle for the law enforcement officer's narrative.

17/27

Tom

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 2:19 PM
To: district1@waldocountyme.gov; laurieallen55@msn.com
Subject: Fw: ankle email and Greely Fw: Test

Ms. Johnson, Waldo County Commissioner of Belfast,
This is Laurie Allen, falsely charged 3 times, with false arrests, hate crimes and terrorism from Belfast law enforcement for not allowing my property to be stolen by Maine corrupt government. Years ago, I received 2 anonymous, sexually threatening, terrorizing letters. Sheriff Trafton and Chief McFadden began blocking my emails for protection and investigation at that time.
I have been shackled with a cancer cell ankle tracker since 3/2/2018 where I was not supposed to get out of Two Bridges but they bailed when I got a letter to the outside with an exiting jail lady. Judge Sparaco has awarded several of my cases and recently a protection order against Mark Rae who has been terrorizing me with hate crimes, theft, threats, assault after assault to my property and vehicles, endless crimes, daily, since last May. Documented into a 1 1/2 hr move Overview Greed of just some of the horror. Including today. Violating the protection order. Belfast law enforcement protects the raging, huge Mark Rae and all the heavy equipment and his workers joining in on mob mentality to hurt me for not allowing them to take my property.
In Superior Court on 6/6/18, at 11am, my son and I walked into an empty building. Not one person, all doors closed, no security, no scans or checks. Up the stairs and into a staged courtroom with only Judge Murray, ADA Entwisle and Marshall Dudley. The same 3 since December 2018 where I've yet to be heard for immediate dismissal of all charges for false ALL. Proven. Documented. To walk in with my son this time and not alone as always. Murray ran, he didn't even hear my motions to dismiss again. Ordered the bail conditions remain and the title 15 denied since I just won a protection order Pro se. Against Mark Rae who got a false arrest on me with a false unavailable video. Right.
Now Greeley won't let me go to the Court house or Police Station and will not put it in writing. Rick Otto said he would email me Greeley's decision but is resisting the email that he said he would send. His email is blocking me, his are reaching me. Greeley just left me a message to call him. I will not talk to him anymore. He was yelling and yelling at me, his officer yesterday threatened to arrest me when he came to my house, the NEW monitor- 2 have broke, sending out breaches again and again, more blue mean men at my door... I rarely go out because I want to live for my children. But they keep coming and inciting. The new monitor began vibrating and flash into my skin where my father, sister and 2 brothers have died from cancer but of no concern to enforcement, Courts and agencies. I called Rick Otto and left a message to stop the swat team from coming. Then I called 911 and told them because I wanted it documented in case I was taken again.

18/27
Please call Greeley and tell him to email me any problems he has with me or have Rick Otto do it. Stop this please. I'm a mother and an honest person. 57 years old and this is not my doing. It's the government. Freedom of Speech in America not in he United States. I want to change that and keep on talking. Clearly knowing they want me to die for it. 2 times. My honor. Truly,
Laurie Allen www.boycottbelfast.blogspot.com

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 12:13 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: 3rd req Dismissal Motions Harassment

I was never given any cease harassment notices with my original signature as mandated on the form. Bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed at the Waldo Jail on 11/1/2017 when he took my bail money and I told him that I did not receive the notices. He confirmed that they were not on my personal belongings list and told the officers. They responded that I would be getting copies. Otis left and the officers never gave copies either. I don't even know what this arrest was for and still don't as of 6/10/2019 nor do I know what the 2nd harassment charge is. I continue to ask for these original notices. I went to the Belfast Police Department in 11/2017 and Officer Guba told me I would not be getting any original signed notices. I told Judge Mathews at the 12/8/2017 hearing for the 1rst harassment charge and at every hearing since.

Belfast Police Chief McFadden and Officer Rolerson refused my repeated requests for a cease harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace, Rae/Cameron Trust, Mark Rae, family and workers from 5/2017-9/2017 with video proof and Officer Rolerson protecting them.
July 2017 Mark Rae threatens to throw my personal property off of my property. Mark lies stating he has had it surveyed and fails to produce it in Court where Judge Sparaco issued me a protection order against Mark Rae 5/2018. After first minute there is nothing, just waiting for police.https://youtu.be/qZin170SEAU

July 2017 Officer Rolerson responds and agrees it's a civil matter, no jurisdiction for police, threatens me that it could be a criminal matter. Kayla LaCombe states a new survey line. They don't have a survey. Rolerson protects them. https://youtu.be/DEuvPBIR5Ws

2017 @ 3:08 Mark Rae threatens that if I don't move my boat by tomorrow morning, he is taking it. https://youtu.be/oOPXGgKgBrE

2017 Kayla Lacombe (grandaughter to BO Cameron) trespassing and throwing my personal property https://youtu.be/KWg8IegpaZA

2017 Mark Rae mauls my boat, slices my boot lock, slices the air valve off my tire, straps a bungee cord to try and get boot lock off, leaves permanent tar boot prints on the deck of my boat. Officer Juba does nothing. I ask for a cease harassment again. @ 1:33 I see for the first time that Mark Rae destroyed my tire. I hadn't noticed it with all the other destruction he did. Lots of f cursing. Venting verbally. For 7 years while protesting and attending City Hall

19/27

meetings, I did not curse. All these men and a few women coming after me made me lower myself. No more. https://youtu.be/S9X9_GwzOX0

First and ONLY Criminal Trespass Notice by Officer (Sargent ?) Gibbs to set up another arrest.

6/26/18 where he states it means nothing until violated, ie I trespass onto my property that 23 Seaview Terrace, Cameron/Rae family keeps trying to take, illegally with government support.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D1wqpu3WmVOQhSdU0AEuarHCnhid7m7h/view?usp=sharing

9/13/18 Officer Richards calls Sgt. Gibbs and is advised to arrest me for criminal trespass as I am parked in the City right of way on my property. I show Richards the survey and original plans with original boundaries of Seaview Terrace, 1966. No boundary changes or sub divides have been done on Seaview Terrace per City Planner, Wayne Marshall 2012. I move my SUV @ 6:35 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1upETERoms-T7TTFK8BgV7DPnpvVVsv9n/view?usp=sharing

10/30/18 Mark Rae trespassing, destroying my property with front loader regardless of protection order from Judge Sparaco. https://drive.google.com/file/d/12xZJjsKlXrk66lKgglTS4NrYoZCmcS3y/view?usp=sharing
From: Michael McFadden <chief@belfastmepd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:51 AM
To: LAURIE ALLEN; ward3councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward4councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward5@cityofbelfast.org; ward2councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward1councilor@cityofbelfast.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org
Cc: Gregory Stearns; Jeffrey Trafton; Governor; robert.a.williams@maine.gov
Subject: RE: Cease Harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace

Ms. Allen,

Over the past couple months there have been several complaints generated by you and/or your neighbors regarding a boundary line dispute. The Belfast Police Department has responded to every one of the calls for service made by you and/or your neighbors. As with most if not all boundary line disputes the actual situation cannot be resolved by the police due to the fact that we have no authority over boundary lines. This has been explained to both you and your

neighbors. The officers have given sound advice as to how both parties need to proceed in order to come to a resolution on this issue.

As far as your repeated requests to have your neighbors issued harassment notices along with the real estate agents who sold the property, I would explain that the Belfast Police Department does have the authority to issue harassment notices, however we do so if/when we're able to determine harassing conduct is present. I have reviewed the videos you've posted to your

20/27

YouTube channel regarding the alleged harassing behavior and find no behavior on your neighbors part that would justify a harassment notice being served on them.

I have not responded to your repeated emails until now due to the fact that you seem to ignore what I say and simply make another identical demand to have a harassment notice served on your neighbors.

As I've said before, at this time the Belfast Police Department will not be issuing a harassment notice on anyone based on the information you provided. I will say that should you provide us with information that justifies a harassment notice be served we will most certainly follow through with that function.

Thank you for your understanding.

Chief McFadden.
On 9/7/2017 Chief McFadden offered 23 Seaview Terrace a cease harassment against me without any proof and I was issued notice but not given the original notice that I asked for and continue to ask for.
On 10/23/17 Officer Guba served me a summons for a violation of the 9/7/2017 cease harassment on 10/17/17 per a video taken by worker Kevin Page that is not available but is "clearly" my voice harassing Mark Rae. This did not happen. The court hearing was for 12/8/17. Here is video of Kevin Page harassing and scaring me and the protection order against Mark Rae granted to me by Judge Sparaco 5/2018 and upheld by the Maine Supreme Court.
On 11/1/2017 the K9 unit and another Belfast PD Crusier came to my home in the evening and arrested me. This was the last arrest before 2/23/18 where I was falsely arrested and charged with terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.

The end of this 6/12/2019 12:15pm email. Thank you.

Tom,

Truly Innocent

Laurie

21/27

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:13 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: 4th request Re: Confusing Hrsmnt DiscoveriesRe: Allen

Tom,

Text in red is for you to respond to.

1. Separately list EACH harassment charge with the date I was forced to sign the notice and the evidence given for the Belfast Police Department to ISSUE EACH NOTICE.

2. List the date of summons, the date of issue for which notice, the date of violation, the evidence, the court date and the corresponding docket number.

3. List the date of arrest, the date of issue for which notice, the date of violation, the evidence, the court date and the corresponding docket number.

11/13/17 Arrest Booking#J17-01194 Arrest/Offense

22/27

11/13/17 Law Incident Harassment B17-5361 Sister complaint

11/13/17 Law Incident Harassment B17-6522 Sister complaint

10/17/17 Name Rae, Mark A Complainant

10/17/17 Name Allen, Laurie, L Suspect

10/17/17 Name Page, Kevin L Witness

10/17/17 Cad Call 14:45:56 10/17/17 Violation PO Initiating Call

The report is not credible. It makes no sense. I included it now for clarity of fabrication and ease of reference. Once you respond to above red I will question this report in it's entirety.

5. The 2nd discovery packet has 2 ADA cover sheets.

A.The first is dated December 6, 2017 and references Docket No. CR-17-862 and states "Enclosed are pages 1-13 of discovery materials in reference to the above captioned case." Another ADA cover page dated February 23,2018 and does not reference the docket number "DOCKET NO: CR-17 " What is the docket number for this 2/23/18 cover sheet and confirm that the 12/6/2017 cover sheet docket no. CR-17-862 is correct.

B. Stating enclosed are pages 14-20 of discovery materials in reference. The pages with the hand written circle 1-9 and appear to be part of the 13 pages referenced on the cover page for CR-17-862. Are 4 pages missing? Advise and send if applicable. My blog pages are not evidence and ADA Entwisle had stated in a previous hearing that these blog pages are no longer part of the discovery. The circle pages are 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 totaling 6 pages. Making a total of 15 pages in the PDF for this mess of the 2nd? harassment charge.

23/27

Sgt. Cook, Officer Guba , and myself went to 17 Seaview Terrace to speak to Laurie. At first, she would not come to the door, but did eventually open her window. Laurie started to rant, when Sgt. Cook informed her of the situation at and and that she was being arrested. I was able to arrest Laurie and transport her to corrections without issue.

and states "As with most if not all boundary line disputes the actual situation cannot be resolved by the police due to the fact that we have no authority over boundary lines. "

It is clear that the State has no evidence for the harassment charges and the charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon is absolutely Freedom of Speech/Expression. BEYOND ANY DOUBT!

24/27

Please respond to the red immediately or respond all dismissed.

Truly Innocent,

Laurie Allen

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 4:30 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Harassment Discovery

Laurie -

Tom

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 7:05 PM
To: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>; laurieallen55@msn.com <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Motion for Discovery of all 3 chargesRe: Notice Hearing

Tom- if you have to motion to get these discoveries then they won't be heard until 7/23 and we won't be able to do the motions for dismissal. Is that correct? Or can you get a court date right away for the motions for he 3 discoveries so that the dismissal motions can be heard in the 7/23 disp hearing. Or can the ADA just send you the 3 discoveries by next week as he should have done when you were appointed. Please respond to this and then we will decide if a motion for discoveries is needed. Thank you.

Laurie

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 6:32 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion for Discovery of all 3 chargesRe: Notice Hearing

Tom,

25/27

Thank you for responding. Please motion for discovery of all three charges. We agree that pages are missing from the harassment discoveries.'Advise when you will do this and confirm that you will email them .

Laurie

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 12:03 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Notice Hearing

2. I am not going to do this. As I mentioned to you in an earlier email the docket number the DA places on the cover page has no substantive significance. Criminal Defendants and Criminal Lawyers acting on their behalf do have legal recourse to get discovery that the DA has but has not sent. It is called a Motion for Discovery.

3. I spoke with Michele Leach. Brooke Otis is on vacation. There are no pending motions in the three pending criminal matters in the Waldo Judicial Center.

4. There does not need to be any motions pending (and there often is not) for the court to schedule a disposition conference.

Tom

On Friday, June 28, 2019, 09:22:02 AM EDT, LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com> wrote:

Tom,

Please respond to all, 1-5 today. This is is very troubling.

Are you stating that you do not have ADA Entwisle's discovery for the State's charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon and filed a motion for dismissal of this charge against my instructions?
Advise when I will receive via EMAIL via PDF as you have done with the incomplete harassment discoveries, the complete discoveries, with the cover page reflecting the docket #, charge and how many total pages for each discovery of the 3 charges, 2- harassment, 1- terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. It is incomprehensible that the ADA charged me in 2017 and 2018 and I cannot get the discoveries as of 6/28//2019. You should have legal recourse for
26/27

this as my defense attorney and should have demanded these when you became my defense attorney almost 2 months ago.
Please confirm motions you had filed without my consent have been withdrawn legally. To my knowledge there were 2. One for bail conditions to remove ankle monitor and travel restrictions and the 2nd was to dismiss terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. If these motions are still in the court system after you advised my that you withdrew them, withdraw them immediately today and confirm with court clerk Brooke Otis that they are withdrawn.
Please email me confirmation that you spoke today to court clerk Brooke Otis and confirms that there are not any motions filed on my behalf for my 3 charges, 2 harassment, 1 terrorizing with a dangerous weapon, or any other charges in the Maine Judiciary system.
Please explain how the court hearing for a dispositional conference is 7/23/2019 without any motions filed on my behalf.

Thank you.

Laurie Allen

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 3:23 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Notice Hearing

I have sent you what I have. I copied you on the email to ADA Entwisle requesting that the DA's office send me a complete set. As of this moment I have not gotten a response from him.

Tom

On Thursday, June 27, 2019, 02:30:30 PM EDT, LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com> wrote:

Tom,

How can there be a hearing when motions have not been filed for dismissal because you are not sending the discovery for terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. You must have that since you filed that motion on it and I had you withdraw it. When are you sending it?

Laurie

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 1:02 PM

27/27

To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Notice Hearing

Ms. Allen -

I attach Notice of Hearings on the three pending cases. Thank you.

Tom

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:15 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion to Withdraw

Laurie -

I am filing a Motion to Withdraw today. I attach the Motion.

Tom

BoycottBelfast.blogspot.com Take Rape Break Intake 4 JustUs More More More

Pages

August 6, 2019 Motion for complete 3 Discoveries from ADA Entwisle

No comments:

Post a Comment