#1
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Pending
8/24/2018 Special Motion to Dismiss Maine Legislature Title 14
Section 556
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
This motion should
have been on the docket for my 10/22/18 Superior Court hearing with
Judge Robert Murray. It was not and is still pending. Please advise
of status:
August 24, 2018
Laurie Allen,
Defendant
v.
State of Maine
Special motion to
dismiss all charges (2 harassment and 1 terrorizing with a dangerous
weapon) to date under Special Motion to Dismiss Maine Legislature
Title 14 Section 556. Deputy Chief Judge Susan Sparaco is in receipt
(and in my court file) of my July Dismiss without Prejudice packet
for proof.
I have not been
heard compiled with many violations of the Constitution of the State
of Maine. Attached.
Declaration of
Rights Violated
1. Natural Rights
2, Power inherent in
people
3. Freedom of speech
and publication; libel; truth given in evidence; jury determines law
and fact.
4. Unreasonable
searches prohibited.
5. Rights of persons
accused.
6. Discrimination
against persons prohibited
Signed
Laurie Allen
#2
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
Please advise of the
status of Laurie Allen’s 8/24/2018 motion to press charges against
Mark Rae via court order.
August 24, 2018
Laurie Allen,
defendant
v.
Mark Rae
Please motion and
press charges against Mark Rae for Belfast Chief of Police Michael
McFadden’s refusal to press charges against Mark Rae for theft and
destruction to my property. Violating the protection order 5 times in
days. The dvd of proof is an exhibit and can be ruled on today if
possible.
Included are the
emails to Chief McFadden from April 25, 2018 for the theft of my
property. The 2nd thread, dated 8/20/18 is for the
violation of the protection order.
Signed
Laurie Allen
#3
1
of 5
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Immediate
Written Decision from Judge Robert Murray to be received 21 days
prior to ANY future court hearings (as of 10/26/18, no further
hearings received) for Laurie Allen’s hearing at Waldo Superior
Court on June 6, 2018 at 11am for motions below:
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
1.
April
10, 2018
State
of Maine
Waldo
Unified
Criminal Court
CR18139
Title
15 Psychiatric Evaluation
Motion
to Dismiss Title 15 Immediately
State
of Maine
v
Laurie
Allen, defendant
Defendant
Laurie Allen requests the unified criminal court to grant this motion
to dismiss the state of Maine’s request for a title 15 psychiatric
evaluation. Defendant Laurie Allen gave the challenge on 2/09/2018 to
Stephanie the clerk at Waldo county district court, 103 Church
Street, Belfast, Maine, 04915.
1.
Defendant Laurie Allen did not terrorize per Schenk v.
United States.
2.
Defendant Laurie Allen has consistently and solely defended herself
in court in the Waldo county court system since 2011 for a total of
seven (7) appearances.
2.
April
10, 2018
State
of Maine
Waldo
2
of 5
Unified
Criminal Court
Docket
no. : WALCD CR 2017-00862
Motion
to Dismiss Harassment Immediately
State
of Maine
v
Laurie
Allen, defendant
Defendant
Laurie Allen requests the unified criminal court to grant this motion
to dismiss harassment immediately.
1.
Defendant Laurie Allen was never given the original cease harassment
notice that the defendant Laurie Allen was forced to sign. The
form states that the signed original cease harassment notice is
given to the signature party.
2. Furthermore, the prosecuting
attorney does not have valid evidence of any violations of the
illegal cease harassment notice resulting in the arrest of defendant
Laurie Allen.
3.
April
10, 2018
State
of Maine
Waldo
Unified
Criminal Court
Docket
no. : WALCD CR 2017-00139
Motion
to Modify Bail Conditions for Immediate Relief
State
of Maine
v
Laurie
Allen, defendant
Defendant
Laurie Allen requests the unified criminal court to grant this motion
to remove electronic monitoring device and traveling restrictions.
1.
Laurie Allen has complied with bail conditions since ordered on
3/01/18.
2.
Per Laurie Allen’s case manager, Rick Otto, at Tuesday’s check-in
(4/10/18), there have not been punishable violations of conditions
from the sheriff’s office.
a.
Missed check-in on March 20th due to Mark Rae terrorizing
hate crime again using heavy equipment to trespass, plow, and
destroy my land as I was leaving for check-in. I
3
of 5
called
911 and had to wait and wait for Belfast police to arrive. Officer
Kelly was not concerned for my safety or Mark Rae’s crimes.
b.
April 8, 2018, I saw that Belfast Variety was not in the brown
restricted zone. Drove Route 1 North to Belfast Variety and then
thought that Mike Hurley lived somewhere down the road past
Belfast Variety. I immediately stopped at Belfast Variety and
called the jail. I was told I was in the restricted zone and I
never got out of my vehicle and told the jail I was immediately
going home.
Both a and b incidences were
cleared and the only incidences.
4.
April
10, 2018
State
of Maine
Waldo
Unified
Criminal Court
Docket
no. : WALCD CR 2018-139
Motion
to Dismiss Terrorizing
State
of Maine
v
Laurie
Allen, defendant
Defendant
Laurie Allen requests the unified criminal court to grant this motion
to dismiss terrorizing immediately.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2010/08/in_the_line_of_ire.html
Regarding
your case and similar ones, the plaintiff has to prove that there is
an intent to commit/incite lawless behavior and, further, that the
lawless behavior is likely to occur. This concept is derived from a
landmark case, Schenck v. United States, which related to
the draft and free speech. In that case, Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes Jr. concluded that free speech (particularly
violent/dissenting speech) can only be punished if the speech posed
a “clear and present danger” of succeeding in inciting
criminal behavior. Though Schenck v. United
States was later overruled by another case, Brandenburg
v. Ohio, the Court maintained its standing on free speech: it
cannot be punished unless the speech is “directed to inciting or
producing imminent lawless action and is likely to
incite or produce such action.” Though the court will almost
certainly split hairs over whether you were trying to incite
lawlessness, it is unlikely that they can prove that you posed a
“clear and present danger” or were “likely to incite or
4
of 5
produce
such action.” I would highly suggest looking at the cases I
mentioned, the attached article, and other related matters. Again, I
think that most of this will come down to their inability to prove
that you were “likely to incite or produce such action.”
The
article also includes some related cases or topics that had far more
intent and malice than your own. Look at those, too.
Superior
court precedence Schenck
v. United States
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Article
attached
5.
April
11, 2018
State
of Maine
Waldo
Unified
Criminal Court
Docket
no.: WALCD CR 2018-139
Amend
4/10/18 Motion to Brandenburg v. Ohio
State
of Maine
v
Laurie
Allen, defendant
Dear
court clerk Melissa,
Per
our phone conversation on 4/10/18, please use this letter to amend my
motion to cite Brandenburg v. Ohio Supreme Court Ruling STANDING
ON FREE SPEECH. Big respect
for you.
Sincerely,
Laurie Allen
17 Seaview Terrace, Belfast,
Maine, 04915
207-505-5987
laurieallen55@msn.com
(Copy of this given to me by
Sinclair
210 Terrorizing
1. A person is guilty of
terrorizing if that person in fact communicates to any person a
threat to commit or to cause to be committed a crime of violence
dangerous to human life against the person to whom
5 of 5
the communication is made or
another and the natural and probable consequence of such a threat,
whether or not such consequence occurs, is:
a. To place the person to whom
the threat is communicated or the person threatened in reasonable
fear that the crime will be committed. [Violation of this paragraph
is a class D crime; or 2001 c.383, SS11(AMD); 2001, c.383,
SS156(AFF).]
b.
To cause evacuation of a building, place of assembly, or facility of
public transport, or to cause the occupants of a building to be
moved to or required to remain in a designated, secured area.
[Violation of this paragraph is a class C crime…])
6.
April
10, 2018
State
of Maine
Waldo
Unified
Criminal Court
Motion:
Criminal Charges Reimbursement
State
of Maine
v
Laurie
Allen, defendant
Defendant
Laurie Allen requests the unified criminal court to grant this motion
to reimburse all expenses pending dismissal of all criminal charges.
25.00 1.
Supervision fee, Maine pretrial services
5,060.00 2.
Bail
142.50 3.
Electronic monitoring
70.00 4.
Bail
215.50 5.
Escripts for paper transcripts (not 4/10/18)
200.00 6.
Attorney’s fees, 1 or 2 months, $100 per month, pending additional
fees, April 10 forward.
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Pending
10/11/2018 /24/2018 Hearings only at Waldo District Court.
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
Please advise of
motion status for 10/11/19 motion below:
1. This motion is to order Laurie Allen’s court hearings, today
forward, to be heard ONLY at the Waldo Unified District Court, 103
Church St., Belfast, Maine 04915 for public hearing, witness and
protection.
Truly
Innocent,
Laurie Allen
#4
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Immediate
Written Decision from Judge Robert Murray to be received 21 days
prior to ANY future court hearings (as of 10/26/18, no further
hearings received) for Laurie Allen’s hearing at Waldo Superior
Court on October 22, 2018 at 8:30 am for motions below:
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
Motion for Judge
Robert Murray to charge the State of Maine, ADA Entwisle with
contempt of court. Judge Robert Murray ordered ADA Entwisle to
deliver within 24 hours of hearing on 10/26/18 bail zone restrictions
of roads, streets, intersections and specific boundaries of all zone
restrictions for Laurie Allen to Laurie Allen.
Deadline was
10/23/18, 10 am. It is now 10/26/18, 8 am. No receipt of zone
specifics.
Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen
#5
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Immediate
Written Decision from Judge Fowle to be received 21 days prior to ANY
future court hearings (as of 10/26/18, no further hearings received)
for Laurie Allen’s hearing at Waldo District
Court on August 24, 2018.
Court on August 24, 2018.
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
August 24,
2018
Laurie Allen,
Defendant
v. State of Maine
Motion to dismiss
today’s hearing for missing a court date that I didn’t think was
active. Judge Robert Murray did not hear my motions for dismissal on
6/6/2018 at Waldo Superior Court.
My case could not
proceed and the court hearing to pick a jury is the violation.
Signed
Laurie Allen
#6
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Pending 10/12/18
Motion to halt State of Maine proceedings against Laurie Allen
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
This motion should
have been on the docket for my 10/22/18 Superior Court hearing with
Judge Robert Murray. It was not and is still pending. Please advise
of status:
October 12, 2018
Waldo Unified
District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Court Clerk Brooke
Otis,
On 10/11/18, Laurie
Allen had another hand deliver motions to be acted on immediately.
Due to Judicial violations, State of Maine Law Enforcement/Agencies
and Belfast government horror to innocent, 57 year old, single and
single handed Law Enforcement, the following motions are to be added
on, which will total 7.
5. Motion to halt
all (including Mark Rae’s appeal to the Supreme Court to remove
Laurie Allen’s useless protection order from terror and hate crimes
to Laurie Allen by Rae, video documentation galore since May 2017)
State of Maine court proceedings against Laurie Allen.
Pending initiation of civil actions against the jails/prisons for
allegation of systematic deviations of constitutional rights of
institutionalized persons under Title 42, USC Section 1997.
AKA- The State of Maine Waldo County Jail and Two Bridges
Correctional Facility.
Pro
se,
Laurie Allen
#7
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Pending
10/11/2018 /24/2018 Hearings only at Waldo District Court.
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
Please advise of
motion status for 10/11/19 motion below:
1. This motion is to order Laurie Allen’s court hearings, today
forward, to be heard ONLY at the Waldo Unified District Court, 103
Church St., Belfast, Maine 04915 for public hearing, witness and
protection.
Truly
Innocent,
Laurie Allen
#8
October 26, 2018
Hand delivered today
to:
Waldo District Court
131 Church St.
Belfast, Maine 04915
Re: Pending
10/11/2018 State of Maine pay transcripts and recordings.
Waldo District Court
Clerks and Brooke Otis (Court Clerk),
Please advise of
motion status for 10/11/19 motion below:
Motion for the State of Maine to provide all Laurie Allen’s
transcript and video hearings at Waldo Unified Superior and District
Courts. Requesting hearings in small claims and Judge Sparaco’s
order of protection hearing against Mark Rae. All hearings are
related because of Judge Patricia Worth and her access to recusal. To
be provided at no charge, prior to any further court hearings with
time for review. At this time, Laurie Allen has had to borrow funds
to pay for previous transcripts of incomprehensible violations and
requests complete refund.
Truly
Innocent,
Laurie Allen
No comments:
Post a Comment