Pages

Thursday, May 30, 2019

To Kill An Innocent Mom Pro Se, July 12, 2019, JustMe v. JustUs

                                                                       
                                                                    PUP
                                                           Pinkies Up People
                                             Freedom of Speech/Expression/Rights
                                                                       
Shackled Truth 7/8/2019. 58 years of staying true.  Innocent Mom
 5/15/18 Waldo County Detective Greeley & Pretrail Case Mngr Rick Otto illegally deny my travel to the courthouse and police dept to work my case. Governor Janet Trafton Mills plan for my end @ Two Bridges Correctional through false arrest, 2/23/18 for a legal freedom of speech target shoot https://youtu.be/XrIOrl3qSt "suicide" rape death fails. Shackled with ankle trackher to date, 7/12/2019 since 3/2/2018 with illegal travel restrictions to government buildings- court house, police department, City Hall, library, post office, etc. 

@3:08 I sent a text to Tom to check his email and respond by 5pm today.
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:08 PM
To: shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com; Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon
 

Tom- If you refuse to draw up my motions will the courts accept the motions from me for the 7/23/2019 dispositional conference even though you are still my attorney?

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:01 PM
To: shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com; Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Fw: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom,

I do not agree that communications have broken down. You are still my attorney until the dispositional hearing on 7/23/19.  Will you draw up the terrorizing motion as is and file it by Tuesday,  7/16  or Wednesday 7/17 with the 2 motions to dismiss the 2 harassment charges (I am working on them and will be done with them this weekend). Please respond by business close today, 5 pm. Thank you.


From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 1:02 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Notice Hearing

Ms. Allen -

I attach Notice of Hearings on the three pending cases.  Thank you.

Tom

Truly Innocent,
Laurie

From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 1:15 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion to Withdraw

Laurie -

I am filing a Motion to Withdraw today.  I attach the Motion.

Tom




From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 11:07 AM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom,

Are you filing the motion to withdraw or are you defending me? Please respond by 2pm today. I read your advice for the motion that I prepared and will respond to that later. Thank you.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 4:59 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom,

I didn't mean it like that and clarified it. Please don't withdraw.


From: Thomas Shehan <tshehan@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 4:36 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Further, Ms. Allen, stating that the Motion has to be filed "as is" says to me that are not interested in my advice.  I think communication between us has broken down.  Iwill file a Motion to withdraw.

Tom
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 4:57 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Fw: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon


Tom,

Again, advise of any valid issues with the motion, if none then draw it up, send it to me for approval as you are bound to do by the American Bar. What is the problem with it? Advise. If no problems then you are bound by the American Bar to draw up this very good motion. 

Laurie 


From: Thomas Shehan <tshehan@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 4:31 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Ms. Allen -

I am not signing this motion.  You are free to mail it in.

Tom

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:31 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: ABA ClientFw: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon
1]  Reasonable communication between the lawyer and the client is necessary for the clienteffectively to participate in the representation.
[2]  If these Rules require that a particular decision about the representation be made by the client, paragraph (a)(1) requires that the lawyer promptly consult with and secure the client's consent prior to taking action unless prior discussions with the client have resolved what action the client wants the lawyer to take. For example, a lawyer who receives from opposing counsel an offer of settlement in a civil controversy or a proffered plea bargain in a criminal case must promptly inform the client of its substance unless the client has previously indicated that the proposal will be acceptable or unacceptable or has authorized the lawyer to accept or to reject the offer. See Rule 1.2(a).
[3]  Paragraph (a)(2) requires the lawyer to reasonably consult with the client about the means to be used to accomplish the client's objectives. In some situations — depending on both the importance of the action under consideration and the feasibility of consulting with the client — this duty will require consultation prior to taking action. In other circumstances, such as during a trial when an immediate decision must be made, the exigency of the situation may require the lawyer to act without prior consultation. In such cases the lawyer must nonetheless act reasonably to inform the client of actions the lawyer has taken on the client's behalf.  Additionally, paragraph (a)(3) requires that the lawyer keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, such as significant developments affecting the timing or the substance of the representation.
[4]  A lawyer's regular communication with clients will minimize the occasions on which a client will need to request information concerning the representation. When a client makes a reasonable request for information, however, paragraph (a)(4) requires prompt compliance with the request, or if a prompt response is not feasible, that the lawyer, or a member of the lawyer's staff, acknowledge receipt of the request and advise the client when a response may be expected. A lawyer should promptly respond to or acknowledge client communications.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 2:58 PM
To: Thomas Shehan
Subject: Re: add Fw: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom,

I noticed that the attachments weren't on your response that I replied to. Please draw up the motions with this PDF and print the narritive to attach to it. As stated, if you have any issues with the motion, you were supposed to review it today and advise. If you don't have issue's with it, draw it up, send it to me for my approval  and then file it tomorrow. Easy.

Thanks,
Laurie



From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 4:55 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: 7/10 narrative Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon
Tom,

Here is my narrative to be included in the motion to dismiss Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon that you will draw up tomorrow using all information in the motion and narrative attached in pdf and pasted below for your convenience to use to sendback issues you may identifly. Thank you.

Laurie

July 10, 2019 narrative for the arrest and criminal charge of Terrorizing With A Dangerous Weapon on February 23, 2018

In January 2018,Spectrum had corruptly cut Laurie Allen’s internet, landline and cable, an 8 year full paying customer.. Since May 2017 Laurie’s property and rights to life are being taken by abutting May 2017 owners of 23 Seaview Terrace. Mark Rae, his mother, Penny Rae Cameron, step-father B.O. Cameron, grandaughter Kayla Cameron LaCombe, their family real estate agent Terry LaCombe, their attorney and Belfast City Attorney Bill Kelly, and worker Kevin Page with the support and illegal approvals of Belfast Chief McFadden, Belfast City Council, Belfast City Manager Joe Slocum, Belfast City Planner/ Zoning, Wayne Marshall and City Tax Assessor Martin Brent. Details of Chief McFaddens fabricated harassment, fabricated charges and 2 false arrests can be found in the narrative for dismissal motions of two 2017 harassment charges at the 10th hearing/dispositional conference on 7/23/2019 @ 10:30 a.m.

The third charge to be heard on 7/23/2019 @ 10:30a.m. is Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon.
This is the narrative for that arrest on 2/23/2018 that is yet to be heard.

At 12:55 pm on February 23, 2018, Laurie Allen sent this email to then Attorney General Janet Mills calling out 8 years of corrupted FOIA requests and Canon Rule violations by Judge Patricia Worth, Judge Joseph Field, Judge Paul Mathew and Judge Robert Murray. Since this email, Judge Everet Fowle, Supreme Court Judge Donald Alexander, Judge E. Mary Kelly and Laurie’s 2/27/18 video trial female Judge ? (pretrial case manager Rick Otto is not responding with the name) at Two Bridges Correctional Facility, Wiscasset, Maine, have violated these Judiciary Canon Rules. This email proves 8 years of unhealthy stress from government corruption continually targeted to Laurie Allen since the Belfast City Hall forced water slaughter corruptly tore through Laurie’s small property abutting MaineHealth’s zone violating campus and Judge Patricia Worth’s friend’s Penny Rae Cameron and B.O. Cameron, illegal zoning abutters @ 23 Seaview Terrace.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:39 PM
To: attorney.general@maine.gov; LAURIE ALLEN; chief@belfastmepd.org
Cc: same
Subject: Re: dismiss/corrupt Judge Worth, Fields, Mathews
Maine Attorney General Janet Mills and Deputy Chief Judge Honorable Susan Sparaco,

To date, I have not received ONE FOIA request 8 years and counting FROM MILLS. My challenge in the private chambers of BEAUTIFUL destroy for children concentration camps sentenced by MILLS is on Monday January 22, 2018 for my lobotomy. I have yet to receive any FOIA requested to MILLS & SPARACO & MURRAY & MATHEWS and yada, yada, yada ... TO SILENCE MOM WITH YOUR SYSTEM OF FELONS. 

I am at the Belfast Public Library because Belfast Chief of Police Michael McFadden, prior Maine State INTERNET CHILD PORN Detective (per Peter Taber, 40 year Belfast police reporter, is a "KNUCKLE DRAGGING THUG") and his brother-in-law, child porn download to their target of the whim, TWC Belfast home invasion, TWC/Spectrum guy Tom unknown, has cut ALL my media freedom of speech and trash. Cable, landline, thank you so much, child gone, stinking internet. Invite only by Tom and Mike.

I am sending this email shortly, printing and delivering to Waldo County District Court Clerks for another FOIA request for ALL transcripts on  Monday, 1/22/2018 @ 2:30 pm, at Waldo Superior County Superior Court with which dishonorable is a crap shoot. And of course for closed private insane session felony Mills ordered lobotomy. Wrong cranial Miss Mills.

I am quite certain that I will receive nothing true or sane. But, the rope is your to tighten. Or stop. 

FYI STATE OF MAINE V. LAURIE L ALLEN Criminal Docket Waldo Docket No. WALCD-CR-2017-0082 Offense: 001 HARASSMENT.
This is to notify you that a HEARING has been set for MOTION FOR MENTAL EXAMINATION on 2/26/2018 at 2:20 pm at the : WALDO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 137 CHURCH STREET, BELFAST, ME 04915. YOUR PRESENCE IS REQUIRED ON THIS DATE AND TIME.

Date 02/07/2018

Karen Page, Asst. Clerk of Courts

Attention Defendant:
Failure to appear at the above date and time may result in a default being entered, bail being forfeited, and the issuance of an arrest warrant.

D.A. : JONATHAN R LIBERMAN
Officer JOHN GIBBS         Dept: BEL

Ditto same private operation, lobotomy, another false harassment ordered silence by AG Miss Mills, docket No. WALCD-CR-1017-00839.

I WILL PERSONALLY AND PUBLICLY STAND TALL AND COME TO BELFAST DISTRICT COURT OWNED CLERK, NOT ALLOWED TO LEGALLY VIDEO TAPE CLERK AREA PER CORRUPT OWNED CORPORAL DUDLEY, AND ASK FOR ALL THE COURT TRANSCRIPTS FOR EVERY STINKING COURT JESTER. SINCE RETIRED DISHONORABLE FIELDS BEGAN MY HIT IN 2011 . RIGHT. YO TODD BEAMER LET'S ROLL. SEE YA FRIDAY. LOBOTOMY OR NOT. BE BRAVE, BLOW MY FACE OFF BUT DO NOT "ANONYMOUSLY OR PROUDLY" SEND VIDEO OR PICS TO MY BABIES.

Always,
Mom with love.

At 6:15pm, 2/23/2018, in the cold dark, someone was knocking on Laurie Allen’s door. Laurie went to the window, there were not any vehicles and saw Officer Jon Guba in plain clothes at her door. Guba wanted Laurie to come outside to talk to him. Laurie refused stating she would talk to him from the window. Two uniformed Belfast police officers jumped out from hiding in the bushes and stormed towards Laurie’s door to bust it open. Laurie ran to grab her phone to call 911 while running to open her door to stop the police from breaking it down and releasing Laurie’s beagles. Laurie lives alone. As Laurie came outside while talking to 911, an officer grabbed the phone and threw it to the ground. Laurie had given the 911 operator her name and address by that time. Laurie was cuffed and two officers pushed Laurie down the road of Seaview Terrace towards Northport Ave. Laurie begged to be allowed to put jeans on. She was only wearing tight inappropriate leggings and a shirt. The officers refused and from Northport Ave., a Belfast police SUV turned right onto Seaview Terrace and shoved Laurie inside. Laurie kept repeating “I have nothing to say, I want an attorney.” to the Waldo Jail and in the garage bay of the Waldo Jail. Laurie was alone in the SUV in the garage for at least 10 minutes still repeating “I have nothing to say, I want an attorney.” Officer Richards kept circling the outside of the SUV yelling “Shut that fucking bitch up.”, the entire time that Laurie sat cuffed in the SUV.

Creepy Body SearcHER Officer Seth
Inside the jail, Laurie kept her eyes closed as Officer Seth searched her and questioned her. He yelled at her for moving when she reached for a book to read. Laurie’s bail was a ridiculous $25,000. Laurie, then 57, was below poverty @ 18k a year and did not have any record prior to false charges and arrests by Chief McFadden in September/October 2017. Laurie called her wealthy brother, George Allen in Skowhegan, Me., George would not post the bail nor assist with an attorney. Laurie was placed into the cell and had gone on a hunger strike as soon as the Belfast officers grabbed her from her home. Laurie was certain that she was going to die from an incarcerated “suicide” aka rape death and hoped to die in a hospital of organ failure instead.

Laurie’s friend went to her home to care for her beagles Stewie and Gordon, that Friday night, 2/23/18. He found Laurie’s cell phone on the dining room table. Belfast police had entered Laurie’s home without her permission with no one to witness what was taken and if surveillance was planted.

Officer Seth came into Laurie’s cell and stating he brought her 2 blankets instead of 1 and offered to make her bed up and that he was sorry for yelling at her. Laurie went to the corner of the cell and refused the offer. It was disturbing. The television was on all night long and after midnight only showed a shopping channel of sexual vibrators until 6am. It was very disturbing. Previously, Laurie had received 2 sexually threatening anonymous letters in the mail and Chief McFadden would not return Laurie’s visit to the Police Department or calls to report the letters. Laurie brought the letters to Sheriff Trafton and he was not very concerned, stating there was nothing he could do. Instead, Sheriff Trafton spoke of his dislike for City Manager Joe Slocum and Nancy See, assistant to tax assessor Bob Whiteley.

Friday night, Saturday, Saturday night, and Sunday, Laurie did not eat and remained in her cell. Her constant requests for an attorney were ignored. Sunday afternoon, 2/25/18, Laurie was transported by Officer Laurie to Two Bridges Correctional Facility, Wiscasset, Maine. Upon entering the cell pod, Laurie immediately requested access to to the law library. The guard snickered and said “You ain’t gettin’ into no law library.” Later, the acting therapist came into the pod and had a cell mate take all her clothes off and put her into the bubble, s contained cell with full visibility. Guards were taking the newer mattresses from the women’s cells andl replacing them with old, thin, blue mattresses. The male prisoners prepared the women’s horrible food. Salt had to be bought. The women were contained to the pod, no outdoor yard time, gym, etc. Allowed once a week to a book piled room and allowed to knit/crochet in the pod for a few hours per week.

Laurie’s daughter had found instructions on the TBCF website and wired $50 into Two Bridges as instructed so that Laurie could make phone calls. Laurie was never advised that the money was there. Laurie could not contact the outside. Laurie refused to sign the medical form to allow treatment by Two Bridges Correctional Facility, the 3rd day of her hunger strike.

Tuesday, 2/27/18, hunger strike day 4, the acting therapist man told Laurie that if she did not eat on this 4th day, she would be placed in the bubble. Laurie did not care or respond. That morning was her trial hearing via video. While waiting in another room, Laurie requested to get a drink of water. The deputy told Laurie no water. Laurie requested to go to the bathroom. The deputy told her no because then she would get a drink of water. Laurie requested a cup to urinate in. The deputy got angry but he had to let her go to the bathroom because there were many witnesses.

As Laurie was seated for her hearing, the attorney of the day, David Sinclair, Bath, Maine, told Laurie that he knew she was representing herself pro se, but asked if he could sit next to her at the table during the hearing. Laurie said yes and David told her what an easy win this was. Citing inaccurate precedence with a protest sign against President Bush, he thought. Laurie stated that it was an easy dismiss but was not allowed into the law library to prepare the dismissal. The female Judge came on the screen with the DA. The DA spoke lies of murderous stalking in town by Laurie, painting Laurie as a terrorist. After he was done, the Judge asked Laurie to respond. Laurie said “Play the target shoot video and dismiss.” The Judge and the DA had not even viewed the video. The Judge refused to view the video on camera and called a recess. David Sinclair was very excited and asked Laurie to let him defend her. Laurie decided she could use him to assist her in the necessary legal documents and said yes. The Judge came back on and stated that she could understand why the Belfast officials that Laurie thanked for being her one time target felt threatened. The Judge stuck with the 25k bail and ended the trial. David stated that he would be in contact and left. Laurie ended her hunger strike because David would get her out. David never contacted Laurie in Two Bridges Correctional Facility again. The guards told Laurie that she could not contact her attorney, David Sinclair.

On Wednesday 2/28/18 in the pod cell, the noon news broadcast that Laurie Allen, arrested for terrorizing Belfast official with a dangerous weapon, had her bail reduced to $5,000. No one informed Laurie of the bail reduction. She was thankful to have heard it on the news, Laurie’s friend saw that newscast and knew where Laurie had exactly $5,000 in her house for bills. Her friend, called David Sinclair to tell him that he was going to post the 5k bail. David corruptly told him to go to Waldo District Court to pay the bail. My friend knew the bail was to be paid at Waldo Correctional but went to the court house as instructed by court appointed David Sinclair, and the court clerk directed my friend to pay the bail at Waldo Correctional on that Wednesday, 2/28/18. Waldo Correctional gave my friend the run around and would not take the bail posting. My friend tried again on Thursday, 3/1 and received the same run around. My friend went again on Friday morning, 3/2/18.

Meanwhile, Laurie could not call her friend to find out why the bail wasn’t posted on Wednesday or Thursday. At 8:30 am on Friday, 3/2/18, Laurie asked the guard at the desk if her bail had been posted.
The guard snickered and said NO BAIL POSTED! It was then that Laurie knew she was not getting out of Two Bridges Correctional Facility alive. Laurie remembered that a cell mate was leaving at 9 am. Laurie began giving verbal and written instructions to the outgoing cell mate. The guards were watching and listening. After the cell mate left @ 9am, there came the announcement over the speaker. “Allen transport back to Belfast 15 minutes.”

The Belfast transport officer had walked past my friend waiting to pay the bail again, that morning, Friday, 3/2/18 in Waldo Corrections. The officer told my friend that he was on his way to transport Laurie back to Belfast. The bail had not been paid at that time. Proof that Two Bridges bailed on the ending plan for Laurie because of the information giving to the outgoing cellmate.

Laurie was shackled with an ankle monitor at Waldo Correctional and released after they took the last of her money and gave her brutal travel restrictions to punish her. No left from her street, Seaview Terrace onto Northport Avenue restricted rom Waldo County General Hospital and her doctor’s office, Belfast City Park where Laurie walked her dogs daily and visited with her families remains in the Penobscot Bay, to the entire downtown Belfast, no library, internet, court house, police station, Belfast City Hall, City Council meetings, waterfront, post office, stores, eateries, auto store, through downtown to the west side of Belfast past Belfast variety where Laurie went fishing, to Swan Lake where Laurie went fishing, no left on Route 1 South next to Seaview Terrace where Laurie went to Irvings for gas, milk and items daily, no Aubuchon Hardware where Laurie went often, no access to her vet, @ Little River on Rte 1 South, all the way into Northport, no Bayside store and only allowed into Bayside at Rte 1 and Cross Street after taking back roads through Belfast to get to that section of Route 1 South, no rightt onto Main St, Belfast from Route 1 North to McDonald’s all the way down to the waterfront, only allowed to go to Hannaford but not around the corner to Laurie’s drugstore, Walgreen’s on Starrett Drive. Not allowed up Lincolnville Ave past the Hannaford entrance or her bank.

Laurie only leaves her home when necessary. Food, gas and court hearings, less than once a week since 3/2/18. Falsifying bail condition violations to place Laurie back in their jails cannot be ignored.

In January 2018, the State had put in a motion to order Laurie to take a title 15 state forensic psychiatric evaluation to deem her incompetent to represent herself pro se in court. Regardless that Laurie had won in small claims court, pro se. Attorney David Sinclair advised Laurie to take the title 15 to “shut them up”. In 2007 during Laurie’s divorce, she had taken a psychiatric evaluation along with her children, by the Guardian Ad litem, Dr. Rosenbaum, Middlesex County Family Court, NJ. Laurie passed without any mental issues to the awe of Dr. Rosenbaum, hired by Laurie’s husband.. Laurie almost allowed the title 15 because of David. Then David told Laurie that it may seem crazy but it would help her case if she had sent the target shoot video out to the Belfast officials mentioned. Laurie responded “Absolutely not.” Laurie became very ill from the ankle monitor and called David several times to motion for removal. He never returned her calls. By April 2018, David Sinclair had not filed any of Laurie’s motions. Laurie left a message for David and asked him if he was representing her or the State. David’s only motion to withdraw as Laurie’s court appointed attorney was granted April 2018. Wasting more tax payers money.

Laurie was restricted from the Courthouse, library, police department and post office making it near impossible to work her case pro se. At every pro se hearing, each Judge would try to convince Laurie to take a court appointed attorney. Nevertheless, Laurie persisted. Laurie’s motions to dismiss were never allowed to be heard. Laurie went to all 7 pro se hearings/dispositional conferences alone since the first hearing on 12/8/17 where Judge Paul Matthews denied Laurie’s right to be heard for dismissal of fabricated harassment charges.

June 6, 2018 was another dispositional conference at Waldo Superior Court for Laurie’s motions for dismissal of all charges and dismissal of the Title 15 psychiatric state evaluation because Laurie had just won a protection order in May 2018 by Judge Sparaco against abutter Mark Rae. More proof of the fabricated cease harassment notice against Laurie from Chief McFadden for 23 Seaview Terrace on September 7, 2017. Chief McFadden dismissed hate crimes to Laurie by Mark Rae and entities of 23 Seaview Terrace. Chief McFadden with Belfast City Hall officials, enabled zoning violations, destruction of property, vandalism, theft, threats, trespass, taking of land, and more since Laurie was sold undisclosed state wide corruption to her home on June 28,2010.

Daily terror from abutting 23 Seaview Terrace and law enforcement since May 2017 to date. Chief McFadden refused to grant Laurie a cease harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace from May2017 to September 7,2017 and offered one to Mark Rae on the same day without justification. Fabricating evidence, violations, summons and arrest with 23 Seaview Terrace violating their own cease harassment notice with the crimes to Laurie stated above. Proven with video documentation. Chief McFadden and his officers protect the illegal home/medical office construction and entities of 23 Seaview Terrace while harassing Laurie to break her. In conjunction with the Waldo Judiciary denying Laurie her rights to be heard since 12/8/2017.
Dishonorable JustUs Robert Murray
Laurie brought a witness for the first time, her 21 year old son to the June 6, 2018, 11 a.m., dispositional conference at Waldo Superior Court. The first floor of the busy Waldo Superior Courthouse was evacuated, no employees, no security guards, no security scanners, and not a person to be found. They proceeded up the stairs and into the court room and stepped directly into a paneled courtroom resembling the District Court. The descending stairs into the vaulted ceiling of the Superior Court room were not visible. The only people in this courtroom stage were Judge Robert Murray, ADA Entwisle, Marshall Dudley, the court clerk, Laurie and her son. Judge Robert Murray was alarmed to see Laurie with a witness. Judge Murray questioned Laurie until she told him the witness was her son. Judge Murray left the bench and did not come back for 10 minutes.

Judge Murray returned and gave the order of the motions. Judge Murray denied the title 15 psychiatric evaluation by ADA Entwisle because Laurie gave proof of winning the protection order in May 2018 pro se. Judge Murray denied Laurie’s motion to have the ankle monitor removed again. Judge Murray denied Laurie’s motion to rescind travel restrictions but told ADA Entwisle to allow access to Laurie’s Dr. at the MaineHealth WCGH campus. Judge Murray denied Laurie’s motion for financial restitution of court expenses. Judge Murray called recess and left without stating another court date. Laurie told her son that Judge Murray must have needed to use the “throne”. Judge Murray never came back and did not hear Laurie’s motions for dismissal of 2 harassment charges and terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.

Laurie would later learn at the August 24, 2018 District Court hearing with resistant Judge Everet Fowle and ADA Entwisle that Judge Robert Murray lied and notated that he heard Laurie’s motion’s for dismissal and denied them. I requested Judge Robert Murray’s written decisions for his claimed denial of motions to dismiss 2 charges of 2017 harassment and 1 charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon 2018. Judge Robert Murray refused to provide his written decision on November 19, 2018.

On July 12, 2018, a Waldo County grand jury Indicted Laurie Allen of one count of Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon. (Class C). The indictment reads as follows:

“On or about January 10,2018, in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen, with the use of a dangerous weapon, a firearm did communicate to Mary Mortier, Michael Hurley, Neal Harkness, Eric Sanders, John Arrison, Joseph Slocum, and/or Wayne Marshall, and the natural and probable consequence of the threat was to place Mary Mortier, Michael Hurley, Neal Harkness, Eric Sanders, John Arrison, Joseph Slocum and or Wayne Marshall, in a reasonable fear the crime would be committed.”

In October 2017, Laurie Allen, went target shooting for the first and only time. Laurie does not own any firearms and has only used a firearm this one time. Laurie Allen filmed the shoot and uploaded the video to her youtube playlist, John & Me. Laurie did not post the video anywhere else and did not send the video to anyone. Laurie made one flippant remark thanking Belfast Public Officials (City Council, City Manager and City Planner) for being her target. Laurie has been protesting and speaking at Belfast City Council and Planning Board meeting of their corruption and destruction to her property and life since May 2011. Laurie Allen has dedicated 8+ years, without compensation to legally expose epic government corruption to the public, first hand, solo and at great expense to Laurie’s below poverty income (18K), health, property, safety and Constitutional rights, too many to list in this motion and not necessary at this time.

10/2017 target shoot https://youtu.be/XrIOrl3qStw

First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever. @ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot. I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will.

@1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said.
@2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright.
@3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. 
I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye.   

@3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "

John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.) I did it. I did it. 9 9 9. I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some."

@6:11 I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marhsall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me." John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.) 

Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl? He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear with these little peanuts. Alright bye."


Belfast Police Chief McFadden stalked Laurie’s youtube channel of over 200 video’s and found this innocent target shoot and sent it to the public officials and global media to incite terror, fabricating Laurie Allen as a terrorist on February 23,2018. Four months after the one time, innocent target shoot where Laurie was not a threat or threatening anyone to date.

In October 2017, the same month as the freedom of speech/expression target shoot, Chief McFadden stated in below email to Laurie Allen’s daughter “At this time I don't feel I can argue effectively that she presents an actual danger to herself or others. She's created considerable inconvenience to a number of people but she has also been very careful not to overtly threaten them.”

Belfast Chief McFadden and the State of Maine, violate Laurie’s First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech/Expression and legal definition of mailice cited below McFadden’s disturbing email using lies and mental abuse tactics.:

Subject: RE: Regarding Laurie Allen
Date: October 20, 2017 at 7:35:35 AM PDT
To: my daughter

xxxxxx,

Thank you so much for reaching out. It's been obvious to me for a number of years that your mom is suffering from untreated mental illness. There are a couple of things that prevent me from being an effective part in addressing those issues for her. First and foremost, it's my strong opinion that your mother would not be willing to seek treatment voluntarily. I have engaged her in conversation a few years ago when she would actually speak with me, and she was highly offended that I was even suggesting she should try speaking with someone. I may be wrong, but there's nothing she's done or said in the last 5 years that I've known her, which would indicate that I am wrong. Second absent her agreeing to accept help, we would be forced to take her into protective custody involuntarily in order to have a physiological evaluation done. In order for me to do this I would first have to determine she is a danger to herself or someone else. At this time I don't feel I can argue effectively that she presents an actual danger to herself or others. She's created considerable inconvenience to a number of people but she has also been very careful not to overtly threaten them. I have a tremendous amount of experience dealing with individuals suffering from mental illness, and although your mother is struggling she simply isn't going to meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization in the typical way. Ultimately however, it's my strong belief that hospitalization is exactly what your mother needs. 

I would agree that your mother's condition has deteriorated in the last several months. She's made numerous comments recently about her alcohol consumption, and I'm left to wonder if the addition of regular drinking is in some way contributing to the decline we're both noticing in her behavior, having no idea if this is a new development or not it's hard to say how much of an affect if any her drinking is having on the situation though.

This situation is not a typical one. Unfortunately the people who are best positioned to help your mother are the very people she's convinced are evil and out to get her. I know this is part of her mental illness and I personally take no offense to the things she says because of that. But my fear is that she simply won't trust me nor any of the officers here. She's also convinced the hospital along with the doctors and administrators of it are corrupt as well.

Honestly in evaluating the entire situation I believe her family (you and your brother) may be the best people at this time to get her the help she needs. I would suggest speaking with someone at Maine Behavioral Healthcare (207-338-2295) to see what options are there for you. I'm more than happy to assist you in whatever way you think I might be able to. It might be beneficial for you to mention that I'd be more than happy to talk with any of the case workers who you speak with at MBH, sometimes it makes a difference if they understand the background and type of behavior we're seeing from a public safety point of view. 

If you'd like to speak with me directly please feel free to call (207-338-5255)

I do appreciate you contacting me and I hope my response is of some help.

Chief McFadden.


Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression
 on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more 
obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 
The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several 
observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance." 
 However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate
 the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment 
fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. 
The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.
Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is
simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of 
the press . . .."  But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built 
upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines 
would go as follows:

If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."
If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a
compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."
A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.
Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is
permitted are constitutional if and only if:
they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;
they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and
they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."
On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government
may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose
of the property in question.
Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless
they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:
1.  Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited. 
2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be
 prohibited. 
3.  Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, 
that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited. 
4.  Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or 
not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, 
and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children. 
5.  Defamatory statements may be prohibited.  (In other words, the making of such statements
 may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.)  However, if the target of the defamation is a 
"public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice." 
 If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
 the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity. 
6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or 
directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is 
reasonably necessary.

What is MALICE?

In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser, 4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart regardless of social duty and fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act in- cludes the willful doing of it. Malice includes intent and will….

During the summer of 2018 as Laurie was dealing with enormous corruption and baiting, Laurie received a private Facebook message from a Shannon Berry, Kittery, Maine, stating she was drugged and cult raped over a weekend when she came interview for a job in Belfast at Bradley Williams home. Laurie now feared for Shannon’s life because Chief McFadden, prior Maine Porn Internet Detective had been hacking Laurie’s youtube and computer since 2011.

New Belfast police chief selected
By Abigail Curtis, BDN Staff
Posted Dec. 20, 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
Belfast native Michael McFadden III, who worked for the Belfast Police Department for 19 years before joining the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit.McFadden, who joined the Computer Crimes Unit two yeas ago, is well-placed to do that, Slocum said.While there, the former Belfast Police Department detective investigated Internet pornography cases.

A sad choice. This knuckle-dragging thug doesn't have any trouble lying shamelessly if he thinks it might gain a conviction. His father, a longtime Belfast police officer who merited wide respect, must be spinning in his grave at how his son turned out. Of course, take this opinion as you might.I was only a police reporter for over 40 years, can hardly be called a cop-hater, and yet I witnessed first-hand how low-down he has behaved.

maine_seashore •

He physically beats false confessions out of people being arrested...just ask Mike Hall ;)

Peter Taber is now activist and owner of https://searsportshores.com/


Laurie dedicated the next 4 weeks helping Shannon. Shannon told of communications with Belfast Officers Gibbs and Lincoln that were disturbing. Shannon wanted Laurie to come to Kittery where she lived with her boyfriend’s elder parents on Naval property and wanted to go to NH to speak to the father of Jeremy Alex. Bradley Williams guitar student that Bradley claims was murdered by Chief McFadden. Bradley approached Laurie in 2012 in town where she was protesting. He said he had a map of where Chief McFadden buries the bones of the murdered. Years later, Laurie recalled being interrogated by Chief McFadden in 2012 because Belfast City Council called her in as a threat for a non-threatening email.

To: ward1councilor@cityofbelfast.org
Subject: Failure of Man
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:45:51 -0500
Marina,

Just now on Sunday Morning, Brad Pitt spoke about his help to New Orleans. He said nothing
makes him angrier than hearing that the devastation was due to an "Act of God" when it is the
"Failure of Man". 
Deja Vu.

Looking the other way through rose colored glasses is open invitation for those who have
other ways. Someone has to fight back- you are not willing to see it and that is dangerous
since you are Council.It is difficult and crushing while you support evil dealings and that has
happened to other residents. 

However, they don't have the money to fight back or the strength. You will see, I hope you
will try before it blows up.

Sincerely,

Laurie


Laurie had been having internet problems with TWC now Spectrum since 2011. Tom was the tech that always came to her house and accessed her computers. Tom brought up a youtube video to test the speed, so he claimed. He said it was his brother-in-law in his garage restoring old tractor mowers that didn’t have brakes. It showed a hand dipping a very rusted piece into a vat and pulled it out looking brand new. No voice, no face. Just the hand and vat. Laurie asked what was used to take the rust off. Tom stated that it was his brother-in-laws home made recipe.

A few weeks later in the interrogation with Chief McFadden Laurie mentioned her father buying a racing go cart when Laurie was 8. Her father took her to the pits behind their house and let Laurie fly. She was coming right at him for the camera picture and didn’t know how to slow it down. Her father yelled turn the wheel Sissy, turn the wheel. She did. Just in time for her father to take the picture, almost getting run over. It had no brakes. Chief McFadden stated that he restores old tractor mowers that don’t have brakes. Laurie said “Hey- you’re the brother-in-law of the TWC guy Tom. I saw your restoring video.” Chief McFadden turned white and almost fell of the chair. Laurie had later thought it was because Tom was his spy, accessing homes, computers and information. Laurie fears now that it is where the bones came out for the bone cemetery that Brad knew of.


Apr 26, 2016 - ... sent to city officials, Williams also accuses McFadden and Deputy Merl Reed of covering up what he describes as the murder of Jeremy Alex. Alex disappeared in April 2004 and has not been seen since. No one has been charged in connection with Alex's disappearance. ... Remember Me ... Northport

Rebecca Simpson - The Jeremy Alex murder has been solved ...


Jul 9, 2016 - The Jeremy Alex murder has been solved, but the Belfast, Maine police are in on it. They actually have the map to seven bodies and won't go ...


Laurie realized that Shannon Berry was a sting operation to get her to Kittery when an unknown man answered the phone after 4 weeks. Laurie heard office equipment and when Laurie asked for Shannon the man said who? He stumbled and said he would get her. Laurie hung up and never responded to the fictitious Shannon again.

From: shannon berry <whiteaintler@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 4:35 AM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Youtube Missing Native American Women

hay I dident know u coming Friday I hope ur ok I had ppl over... asnd I went to the court house

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 11:26 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN; chief@belfastmepd.org; attorney.general@maine.gov; Governor; Jeffrey Trafton
Cc: info@realtyofmaine.com; garryconklin@roadrunner.com; jb@frontstreetshipyard.com; tmailloux@wcgh.org; belfastmaine@gmail.com; bre@ourtownbelfast.org; info@coastalmountains.org; info@maillouxmarden.com; info@belfastlibrary.org; erirish@belfastlibrary.org; snorman@belfastlibrary.org; einstein@toast.net; email@hartdalemaps.com; info@pica.is; support@gameloft.com; julieww@adelphia.net; ned.lightner@gmail.com; michael.cunning2@gmail.com; minister@uubelfast.org; marchas@sitestar.net; office@firstchurchinbelfast.org; info@waterfallarts.org; kimberly@belfastcreativecoalition.org; info@mainefarmlandtrust.org; bbwc2016@gmail.com; info@rjpmidcoast.org; info@waldocountyhabitat.org; beth.callahan@maine.gov; kpooler@cityofbelfast.org; treasurer@cityofbelfast.org; Karen.L.Bivins@maine.gov; f.lehmanea@gmail.com; neal@nealparent.com; madeline@mtaaccounting.com; abowen@allenif.com; jrossignol@allenif.com; ldavis@allenif.com; contact@meanwhile-in-belfast.com; heating@midcoast.com; info@mcleodfurniturestore.com; fitme@citydrawers.com; info@loyalbiscuit.com; deb@outonawhimsy.com; info@frontstreetpub.com; david@3tides.com; info@belmontboatworks.com; thomasfowlerpe@gmail.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; belfastbikes@earthlink.net; kathleenkearns@gmail.com; crabapplecole@icloud.com; crabiel71@gmail.com; charlie.grey@rsu71.org; news@pressherald.com; aobrien@freepressonline.com; bholbrook@courierpublicationsllc.com; bholbrook@villagesoup.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; gooddeeds@wemapit.com; wabi@wabi.tv; news@penbaypilot.com; news@villagesoup.com; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; robert.a.williams@maine.gov; john.e.cote@maine.gov; christopher.grotton@maine.gov; brian.p.scott@maine.gov; carol.tompkins@maine.gov; sue.baker@maine.gov; emadirector@waldocountyme.gov; g.stearns@belfastmepd.org; mstewart@ap.org; compliance@royalseas.com; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; colin@colinwoodard.com; council@bangormaine.gov; jbaldacci@pierceatwood.com; Democracy Now!; Teresa Hallsworth; Cross Insurance Center
Subject: March assault rape and evils ordered to greed system entrynot be Government
Belfast Police Chief Michael McFadden. Waldo Sheriff Jeffrey Trafton and Maine Attorney General Janet Mills,

Female victim has contacted me, Laurie Allen, 17 Seaview Terrace, Belfast Maine 04915 and gives me authorization to report this March 2018 kidnapping and rape to the FBI.

The FBI is in receipt of this email. Belfast Police Officer Gibbs contacted female victim via telephone to advise when and where to legally document female victims detailed statement with;


  1. Receipt in hand of official FBI letterhead document of victim's exact testimony to her person by Bradley Williams, Belfast, Maine 04915, signed by the FBI investigator. 
  2. Receipt of video disc of victims statements to the FBI investigator.
  3. The FBI investigators personal official FBI business card with his contact information. 
  4. Official FBI document with instructions for victim's protection and FBI procedural time frame of FBI investigation.


Belfast Police Officer Gibbs called victim to advise of Waldo County Sheriff Detective Gerry Lincoln appointment to victim's town of residence. 

Victim was given a green card to contact Maine Attorney General Mills directly. Victim called and was transferred direct to Maine Attorney General Janet Mills. Victim states AG Mills told Shannon that she has been waiting for victims call and offered sympathy.

To date, 4 months have passed and victim has no documentation of any investigation or immediate arrest of victim's 4 day cult like assaults and sick attempts of mind control by unstable, posing as a law enforcement and Maine Judicial whistle blower. Many times, Bradley Williams has sought out Laurie Allen to illegally and stupidly be the entrapHER, frameHER into the step 1 intake system to fund the Maine spread corruption by the State of Maine supported by Maine Health and those profiting for Laurie Allen's stupid, failed attempts to eternally end me with malice intent beyond reality. Bradley Williams  system intake step 1 that directly links Bradley to repeated attempts to frame me for immediate silence till death by leader Attorney General Janet Mills, still in stupid process since I went public with Belfast City Hall corruption by Belfast City Hall officials in November 2011 at at Belfast City Council open to the public agenda meeting. 

The FBI has received the  dated and documented details reported to the FBI via internet, FBI Tips. Laurie Allen has simple evidence fabrication for immediate dismissal of all criminal and unknown charges, violation Judicial 101 for all defendants absolute receipt of federal conspiracy committed crimes by Maine AG Janet Mills, Belfast City Hall Officials, Belfast City Hall attorney Bill Kelly also hired privately for Mark Rae and family members (as a legal thug to take more of me and mine)  Maine State Police Internet Child Porn Division. Belfast Chief of Police Michael McFadden (prior Maine State Internet Porn Detective) and his enforcers, Waldo County Sheriff Officials and enforcers, jail enforcers with non-for-profit jail case managers, Judge Worth, Judge Fields, Judge Mathews, Judge Alexander, Judge Murray, court clerks, TWC/Spectrum, CMP, Belfast Post Office, thug Mark Rae, some of his workers, Bo and Penny Rae Cameron, Twin Brideges attorney of the day, Bath criminal attorney David Sinclair posing for the defendant to the never ending feed JustUs and  their "owned" for more bodies to build more non profit for greed profit insanity by the ill elite, pillars of family destruction via any means of any moment. Terrorism, hate crimes, fabrication of false cease harassment notices, false arrests, intense, illegal law enforcement of epic lawless corruption of law,  Court clerks many civil rights, predominantly Freedom of Speech, etc. to first hand witness and ongoing target, Laurie Allen.

Bradley William's is officially well known by the system and is their head hunter and free to do whatever to her step 1.. Belfast law enforcement, Waldo County and State law enforcement,  Belfast City Hall, Maine Unified Court Judge, Belfast resident, Judge Patricia Worth, colleagues, Maine attorney's and court clerks know Bradley Williams intimately. Too intimately. 

This is an FBI investigation and they are in receipt of this email. I have advised victim Berry to report the federal crimes directly to the FBI agent assigned, in person at the location of victim's chosen place. To be videotaped for victim's personal possession of the reporting . I have advised Shannon to confirm her report to the FBI with the FBI letterhead legal document of Shannon's exact reporting with her witness and investigator present.

I have advised victim to have a witness with her at all times until witness protection is in place. Brad Williams is a free man in Belfast, attested many times, first hand sightings of William, mostly at Goodwill, Belfast, Maine 04925. One of Bradley William's hunting grounds. 

Female adult victim is a native American and cannot use the computer for health reasons. Victim has given me full authorization to send this document to the above and the FBI international crimes division. Victim is strong, smart and stable from extensive communications with Laurie Allen.
Laurie Allen

The FBI has the authority to investigate specific violent crimes committed against Americans and American interests overseas, and in some instances, crimes committed by Americans overseas. Those crimes include non-terrorism related hostage-takings and kidnappings, killings and assaults of U.S. federal officers and other internationally-protected individuals, violent crimes on U.S. Government property, and murders of U.S. nationals by other U.S. nationals. Additionally, the FBI investigates crimes aboard aircraft (both domestic and international flights) and crimes on the high seas like piracy and cruise ship violations involving U.S.-affiliated vessels or U.S. persons. The FBI also works to track down U.S. wanted fugitives who flee overseas.





Message is a copy of what I sent to the FBI at 11:10 pm, 7/9/18


Laurie did not receive any response from the FBI, then Attorney General now Governor Janet Trafton Mills, Chief McFadden or Sheriff Trafton.

Laurie suspects there is a rape ring. After Laurie had a Tuesday bail check in with pretrial case manager Rick Otto, Laurie was standing with her BoycottBelfast.Blogspot.com sign in the parking lot at Waldo Corrections. A woman had come out of the Waldo Corrections and told Laurie that she had been assaulted on Friday in Belfast by a Belfast man. Laurie saw the fingerprint choke marks around her neck and her dislocated shoulder. The woman said that she got arrested when she reported it to the Belfast police, placed in jail then transported to Two Bridges Correctional Facility. She did not receive any medical treatment. Her bail was posted and she had just gotten released after meeting with case manager Rick Otto. Laurie fears for this woman’s life as they saw her talking to Laurie.




Copied from Laurie’s blog, www.boycottbelfast.blogspot.com
7/13/2018  5:10 pm. Check in time with Waldo Jail Rick Otto who seems not to care about my case, my innocence, my life. No clue if he did anything to get the injunction to Judge Sparaco. Not interested in corrupt excuses of job limitations. Ain't no limitation on taking Mom out. Lawless & Ordered. AG Mills. Ew. Here's the July 2017 video of the last time I went from go to lights out. I barely was able to get out the door, in case I died before John got me, rushing out of work. I could barely get words out to Marilyn, almost on the street, right across from me. No, she didn't want to come near me as I struggled to say that if I crashed before John got there, take me to St Joe's in Bangor. Barely a nod. Just fear. I understand. I didn't want him to find me dead in the house, thought I'd be bagged before he got there. But, I lived. Not after blowing the minds off the St Joe's staff and Dr. He did do the catscan, I good. Just shutting down to force me to rest and eat. This is hours later, no drugs and I'm talking, good enough. That the video ended with Jesus nailed to the cross wasn't my doing. Although there is a striking reason the camera went there. No what I'm sayin' Mother Nature is pushing me to the limit, always, how much limit can I take? Don't ask me. When I do, I do. When I can't, I'm in very bad shape. This is in your business, take and break, repeat until in the system. I protest.


Laurie was not informed of the Grand Jury indictment on July 12, 2018. Judge Robert Murray did not state that there was any future court date before he fled the courtroom on June 6, 2018. On Tuesday, August 7, 2018, Laurie was at Waldo Corrections for bail check in with Rick Otto. 3 police officers, Guba, Linclon?, and ? Came in and brutally cuffed Laurie while she was filming. Using brute force to put Laurie in the jail just feet away.
Laurie was arrested for failure to appear on August 6, 2018 at Superior Court for a docket call. Laurie’s friend came and posted the $500 bail or Laurie would have been transported back to Two Bridges Correctional Facility.

Laurie’s hearing for failure to appear was on August 24, 2018 at Waldo District Court. Laurie brought all her motions for dismissal of all charges in case the docket read the 2 harassment charges and one terrorizing with a dangerous weapon charge. Laurie was correct. That is exactly what the docket listed. There was nothing about failure to appear.

Judge Everet Fowle did not bring up the charges after seeing Laurie was prepared to defend pro se. Judge Fowle asked ADA Entwisle if the $500 bail was being returned to Laurie because it was a non-court date. ADA Entwisle quickly shook his head no. Laurie states the hearing was a sham, Judge Fowle and Entwisle speaking in short words to each. Laurie kept asking to have her dismissal motions heard. Finally Judge Fowle stated that his notes reflected that Judge Murray heard and dismissed those dismissal motions on June 6, 2018. Laurie stated that Judge Murray did not hear the motions because he called recess and ran. Laurie asked ADA Entwisle to confirm this but Entwisle lied and said his notes reflected the same as Judge Fowle’s. Judge Robert Murray refused to give his written decision for dismissing the dismissal motions on November 19,2018 because he never heard them and is a liar.

On September 11, 2018, Tuesday at bail check in, Rick Otto and Detective Greeley forced Laurie to sign a contract to pay $150 a month, $5 a day to track her with the cancer ankle monitor. They know Laurie does not leave her house. It is to demoralize and break Laurie’s spirit. Nevertheless, Laurie persists.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1M32z9i8_whSbQ_QoPYYdOwoUYtPpoLaF

https://youtu.be/scUAwF4JO1k

On October 22, 2018, Laurie, pro se, had another dispositional conference for a motion to rescind bail conditions. Laurie brought her friend for witness. There were not any security guards or scanners again at the Waldo Superior Court. It was the same paneled District Court looking Superior court room as June 6, 2018. Judge Murray, ADA Entswisle, Marshall Dudley and the court clerk were the only ones in the court room when Laurie was to present her motions. Laurie was thankful her friend was with her. Laurie told Marshall Dudley that there were no security guards or scanners again and told him to check her belongings to verify that Laurie did not have any weapons, please don’t shoot.

Judge Murray had to watch the video where Laurie was deathly sick from the ankle monitor.
It was the 2nd video on the DVD, the first was the 10/2017 innocent target shoot that Judge Murray has refused to see. Laurie played the shoot and the illness. Judge Murray said nothing about the target shoot and asked when this illness occurred. It was 2 weeks after the ankle monitor was shackled to Laurie on March 2, 2018 and July 2018. Judge Murray denied removing the ankle monitor and travel restrictions.

The Waldo Judiciary courts have continually denied Laurie her rights and corrupted 9 hearings as pro se since the first hearing on 12/8/2017. Worn down, Laurie finally agreed to take another court appointed attorney in March 2019. That was Lisa Whittier who soon showed she was for the State, the same as the first court appointed attorney in February 2018, David Sinclair. Laurie motioned for another court appointed attorney, Tom Shehan.

Laurie had Tom withdraw 2 motions, the first for bail condition modification and the second for the charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. Laurie did not authorize those motions and the terrorizing motion was not acceptable. Laurie has yet to receive the discovery for Terrorizing with a dangerous weapon from Tom and ADA Entwisle. Entswisle’s discoveries for the 2 harassment charges are missing pages, and full of problems. First and foremost is that the evidence for both are video’s that are not available.

Laurie stated that she is drawing up the motions for dismissal of two 2017 harassment charges and one terrorizing with a dangerous weapon to be heard at the 10th dispositional conference on July 23, 2019 at the Waldo Judiciary Center.


If the Judge decides not to dismiss all charges, then motions will be presented to rescind bail conditions and if the case is going to trial, a motion for a trial by Judge only.

The End
July 9,2019 From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 3:30 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN; rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; Jeffrey Trafton; chief@belfastmepd.org; district1@waldocountyme.gov; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; Thomas Shehan; attorney.general@maine.gov; William Entwisle; attorney.general@maine.gov; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; Governor; georgeallen99
Subject: Re: Ofcr Gibbs/crisis wrkr/Monitor Fee Mailed 6/28

Case Manager Rick Otto.

Officer Gromley and Sweetser crisis worker Bre Webster came to home again around noon time while I was napping. Officer Gromley took the netting down from fence to get into my backyard, up the stairs where my sliding screen door was open. I heard him yelling my name and came out of my room where the door was closed, a/c and tv on. I was alarmed to see him at my  backyard screen door and asked if I was getting arrested. He said no and was coming in to do another bail check. He was the one that was here on 6/27 and 6/28 with the same crisis worker. I asked him if he was going to come here each time I send an email? He said what email? I said never mind.

He checked my house and asked again if I was taking prescribed drugs. Why he keeps pushing drugs to me is disturbing. Those drugs have a host of side effects, suicidal tendencies, permanent involuntary movements, the list is enormous. I am healthy, calm, comical and living privately and peacefully in my home, allowing police in whenever they want, to do and say as they please. For 485 days straight where I am innocent and shackled. I told him that rapists aren't shackled but I am.

The crisis worker was outside at the front door. I had yet to go outside to talk to her as Officer Gromley came in through my backyard. She stated that my email was concerning to some, the email Officer Gromley claimed to know nothing about. I answered her questions again and said that it seems others would be in need of this as I did not call 911. I am not having any crisis and my emails are freedom of speech. This seems to be harassment to me but I comply.

Is Waldo Correctional having internal problems with cashing my $150 checks these past 2 months? In March, I sent the epay out from Camden National on 3/22 and it was cashed on 4/4, 11 mailing days after 3/22. . In April, I sent the epay out on 4/24 and it was cashed on 5/3, 8 mailing days after 4/24

However in May the epay went out on 5/28 but was not cashed until 6/14.  15 mailing days after 5/28. Luckily I checked with you on the 10th and you wrote that was received. Had I not checked, I could have been arrested for bail violation if they claimed it was received late. 

Here we are again, the epay went out on the 5/28 and it has yet to be cashed so I am asking you again to please tell me if it has been received yet. Please understand that I am concerned not in crisis. 

Thank you,
Laurie

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:30 AM
To: rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; Jeffrey Trafton; chief@belfastmepd.org; district1@waldocountyme.gov; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; Thomas Shehan; attorney.general@maine.gov; William Entwisle; Governor; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; LAURIE ALLEN
Cc: mvogelzang@mainepublic.org; cbeck@mainepublic.org; mstewart@ap.org; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; channan@mainepublic.org; gmaxwell@mainepublic.org; rholt@mainepublic.org; cmorrissey@mainepublic.org; kshortall@mainepublic.org; jmandrake@mainepublic.org
Subject: Re: Ofcr Gibbs/crisis wrkr/Monitor Fee Mailed 6/28

Rick Otto,

1.Please send me an email confirmation when the $150 trackher fee is received from my bank, Camden National.

2.Please advise of the officer's name and crisis worker's name that came to my home on June 27, relentlessy banging on my door, leaving and returing to do the same, walking around my house calling my name relentlessly with no vehicles in sight and frightening me. Who gave the crisis worker my daughter's phone number. The worker called my daughter, thousands of miles away, where Chief McFadden and MPBN VP Charles Beck also contact my daughter to tell her I am mentally ill, please leave my children alone for the upteenth time. That is dispicable. If you must call a family member to continue this stressful "concern" for my "health",  then call my brother who is in Maine. George Allen, VP, Genreal Manager of Beeline Cable .(800) 439-4611.

3.Please advise of the Judge's name and the DA's name at my video trial in Two Bridges Correctional Facility on 2/27/18.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 8:19 AM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon


Tom,

I have amended this motion at #6 to include Dismissal Without Prejudice per Duhaime.org "Justice Schall of the United States Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit) wrote the opinion of the court in 2002 case Graves v. Principi:

'A dismisall without prejudice is a dismissal that occurts without and adudication on the merits. The dismissal of an action without prejudice leaves the parties as though the action had never been brought... A voluntary dimissal without prejudice leaves the situation as if the action never had been filed.' "

Truly Innocent,
Laurie

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 6:43 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom-
 I copied and pasted your response to my original with the pdf for accuracy. I copied and pasted my response and took out the question of the green text. Please respond direct to the green text email. Please work from this email for the terrorizing motion with any communications.  Please do not disregard my instructions as you did when you filed your motion to dismiss terrororizing with a dangerous weapon without my appoval and were able to get that done very quckly and was a problematic motion.  That was very concerning. All charges are easy dismissal and should be dismissed at the 7/23/18 hearing from the motions I am drafting. Thank you. 

Laurie
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 5:46 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Fw: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom- This motion must be completed by Thursday for filing with the court on Friday. Please don't drag your feet on me, I've done all the work. It's a good motion and the narritive will be sent by tomorrow morning, Tuesday, 7/9/2109. 


From: Thomas Shehan <tshehan@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 3:48 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon


Thank you.  I should have some time Thursday to look at this.

Tom

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 6:37 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon

Tom,

Below is the motion I have prepared to dismiss the Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon under title 14 section 556 using the First Amemdment, Color of Law violations, Judiciary Canon Rule violations, and https://casetext.com/case/schelling-v-lindell. Advise of issues with this motion using this email to notate. I have also attached the same in a PDF for you to print. It is necessary to include the entire text of the target shoot. 

Advise if pasted portions such as McFadden's email, Canon Rules, Color of Law, Sosens https://sosen.org/blog/2016/08/01/second-look-at-are-gps-ankle-bracelets-harming-people-that-are-forced-to-wear-them.html , https://cyber.harvard.edu/ilaw/Speech/https://thelawdictionary.org/malice/the Fourteenth Amendment, the Eighth Amendment 
http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/14/title14sec556.html

§556. Special motion to dismiss

and any others if they need to be also listed as exhibits or if including  them in the motion is sufficient in dispositional hearings. Those DVD's must be viewed in court on 7/23.

This motion has to be drafted immediatley, I want your respones by business close Monday, 7/8/2019 for you to complete the motion by Wedsnesday 7/10/2019 for my approval then filing with the Waldo Unified Court by Friday 7/12/2019. As stated before, financial restitution is firm. My case has potential for more if it goes to trial. A simple dismiss keeps me prisoner here. A very vocal and smart prisoner with nothing but time to stay home, protected and go forward.

I will be sending the motions to dismiss the 2 harassment charges and another motion in case the Judge does not dismiss all charges on 7/23/2019 to be heard via Trial Judge only, no jury.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen


7/7/2019 amended 7/9/2019 @ 8am re:#6 added Dismissal Without Prejudice
Superior Court
Criminal Docket WALCD-CR-2018-139

Defendant, Laurie Allen, through her court appointed attorney, Thomas F. Shehan, Jr., moves this Court to dismiss under Maine’s anti-SLAPP statute, 14 M.R.S.A. Sect 556 (dismissing false charges meant to punish defendant’s First Amendment rights) the charge of Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon under protection of the United States Constitution First Amendment guaranteeing the right of freedom of speech and expression.

1. On July 12, 2018, a Waldo County grand jury Indicted Laurie Allen of one count of Terrorizing with a Dangerous Weapon. (Class C). The indictment reads as follows:

“On or about January 10,2018, in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen, with the use of a dangerous weapon, a firearm did communicate to Mary Mortier, Michael Hurley, Neal Harkness, Eric Sanders, John Arrison, Joseph Slocum, and/or Wayne Marshall, and the natural and probable consequence of the threat was to place Mary Mortier, Michael Hurley, Neal Harkness, Eric Sanders, John Arrison, Joseph Slocum and or Wayne Marshall, in a reasonable fear the crime would be committed.”

2. In October 2017, Defendant Laurie Allen, went target shooting for the first and only time. Laurie does not own any firearms and has only used a firearm this one time.

3. Defendant Laurie Allen filmed the shoot and uploaded the video to her youtube playlist, John & Me. Laurie did not post the video anywhere else and did not send the video to anyone. Laurie made one flippant remark thanking Belfast Public Officials (City Council, City Manager and City Planner) for being her target. Laurie has been protesting and speaking at Belfast City Council and Planning Board meeting of their corruption and destruction to her property and life since May 2011. Laurie Allen has dedicated 8+ years, without compensation to legally expose epic government corruption to the public, first hand, solo and at great expense to Laurie’s below poverty income (18K), health, property, safety and Constitutional rights, too many to list in this motion and not necessary at this time.

Exhibit 1 DVD 10/2017 target shoot https://youtu.be/XrIOrl3qStw

First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever. @ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot. I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will. @1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. 

John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said. @2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright. @3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. 

I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye. 
  

@3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "

John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.) I did it. I did it. 9 9 9. I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some."

@6:11 I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marhsall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me." John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.) 

Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl? He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear with these little peanuts. Alright bye."


4. Belfast Police Chief McFadden stalked Laurie’s youtube channel of over 200 video’s and found this innocent target shoot and sent it to the public officials and global media to incite terror, fabricating Laurie Allen as a terrorist.

In October 2017, the same month as the freedom of speech/expression target shoot, Chief McFadden stated in below email to Laurie Allen’s daughter “At this time I don't feel I can argue effectively that she presents an actual danger to herself or others. She's created considerable inconvenience to a number of people but she has also been very careful not to overtly threaten them.”

Belfast Chief McFadden and the State of Maine, violate First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech/Expression and legal definition of mailice cited below McFadden’s disturbing email using lies and mental abuse tactics.:

Subject: RE: Regarding Laurie Allen
Date: October 20, 2017 at 7:35:35 AM PDT
To: my daughter

xxxxxx,

Thank you so much for reaching out. It's been obvious to me for a number of years that your mom is suffering from untreated mental illness. There are a couple of things that prevent me from being an effective part in addressing those issues for her. First and foremost, it's my strong opinion that your mother would not be willing to seek treatment voluntarily. I have engaged her in conversation a few years ago when she would actually speak with me, and she was highly offended that I was even suggesting she should try speaking with someone. I may be wrong, but there's nothing she's done or said in the last 5 years that I've known her, which would indicate that I am wrong. Second absent her agreeing to accept help, we would be forced to take her into protective custody involuntarily in order to have a physiological evaluation done. In order for me to do this I would first have to determine she is a danger to herself or someone else. At this time I don't feel I can argue effectively that she presents an actual danger to herself or others. She's created considerable inconvenience to a number of people but she has also been very careful not to overtly threaten them. I have a tremendous amount of experience dealing with individuals suffering from mental illness, and although your mother is struggling she simply isn't going to meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization in the typical way. Ultimately however, it's my strong belief that hospitalization is exactly what your mother needs. 

I would agree that your mother's condition has deteriorated in the last several months. She's made numerous comments recently about her alcohol consumption, and I'm left to wonder if the addition of regular drinking is in some way contributing to the decline we're both noticing in her behavior, having no idea if this is a new development or not it's hard to say how much of an affect if any her drinking is having on the situation though.

This situation is not a typical one. Unfortunately the people who are best positioned to help your mother are the very people she's convinced are evil and out to get her. I know this is part of her mental illness and I personally take no offense to the things she says because of that. But my fear is that she simply won't trust me nor any of the officers here. She's also convinced the hospital along with the doctors and administrators of it are corrupt as well.

Honestly in evaluating the entire situation I believe her family (you and your brother) may be the best people at this time to get her the help she needs. I would suggest speaking with someone at Maine Behavioral Healthcare (207-338-2295) to see what options are there for you. I'm more than happy to assist you in whatever way you think I might be able to. It might be beneficial for you to mention that I'd be more than happy to talk with any of the case workers who you speak with at MBH, sometimes it makes a difference if they understand the background and type of behavior we're seeing from a public safety point of view. 

If you'd like to speak with me directly please feel free to call (207-338-5255)

I do appreciate you contacting me and I hope my response is of some help.

Chief McFadden.


Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression
 on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more 
obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 
The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several 
observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance." 
 However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate
 the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment 
fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. 
The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.
Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is
simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of 
the press . . .."  But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built 
upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines 
would go as follows:

If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."
If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a
compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."
A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.
Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is
permitted are constitutional if and only if:
they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;
they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and
they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."
On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government
may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose
of the property in question.
Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless
they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:
1.  Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited. 
2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be
 prohibited. 
3.  Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, 
that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited. 
4.  Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or 
not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, 
and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children. 
5.  Defamatory statements may be prohibited.  (In other words, the making of such statements
 may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.)  However, if the target of the defamation is a 
"public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice." 
 If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
 the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity. 
6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or 
directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is 
reasonably necessary.

What is MALICE?

In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser, 4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart regardless of social duty and fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act in- cludes the willful doing of it. Malice includes intent and will. State v. Bobbins. 06 Me. 328. For other definitions see Shannon v. Jones, 70 Tex. 141. 13 S. W. 477; Williams v. Williams. 20 Colo. 51. 37 Pac. 014; Smith v. Railroad Co., 87 Md. 48. 3S Atl. 1072; In re Freche (D. C.) 109 Fed. 621 ; Craft v. State, 3 Kan. 486; Lewis v. Chapman. 10 N. Y. 309; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475. 21 S. W. 193; State v. Witt. 34 Kan. 488. 8 Pac. 709; State v. Walker, 9 Houst. tDel.) 404, 33 Atl. 227; Cotton v. State. 32 Tex. 014; Com. v. Chance, 174 Mass. 245. 54 N. E. 551.75 Am. St. Rep. 306. In the law of libel and slander. An evil intent or motive arising from spite or ill will; personal hatred or ill will; culpable recklessness or a willful and wanton disregard of the rights and interests of the per- ) MALICE son defamed. McDonald v. Brown, 23 R. I. 546, 51 Atl. 213, 58 L. R. A. 768, 91 Am. St. Rep. 659; Hearne v. De Young, 132 Cal. 357, 64 Pac. 576; Cherry v. Des Moines Leader, 114 Iowa, 298, 86 N. W. 323, 54 L R. A. 855, 89 Am. St. Rep. 365; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 73 S. W. 668
TLD Example: The defense attorney successfully proved to the jury that his client acted
 without malice when he broke into the vacant cabin to escape the snow and freezing temperatures.

Exhibit 2- DVD Illness- March 2018 to present illness from the ankle monitor, harassment, mental abuse and fear tactics from Belfast/Waldo County law enforcement. March and July 2018 video of illness from ankle monitor and law enforcement abuse https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qzlo6AQjDJvi2bK2nIRCKLZq9SI1k3qU
sickness again at jail for new ankle shackle https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mJL55JqC--4M0qqzu1u2YkxlTpM-frPT
At the Waldo Jail for Tuesday check in, 3 cops come in (Juba, Lincoln &?) and brutally cuff me to put me in the jail just steps away. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Z_t6pX3SMwgnTGYqeruOFfZENhI-Cj_0
This is only a sample of much more.

5. On February 23, 2018, Friday night, 3 months after the one time shoot, Laurie Allen was arrested with an impossible order of $25,000 bail. Laurie, 58 years old, unemployed, below poverty @ 18k a year has never had a record prior to fabricated charges by Belfast Police Chief McFadden beginning September 2017. Violating Color of Law, excessive force, false arrest and fabrication of evidence, failure to keep from harm:

Color of Law Violations


U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.
Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” to willfully deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law violations, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way. Those violations include the following acts: 
Excessive force: In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to use whatever force is “reasonably” necessary. The breadth and scope of the use of force is vast—from just the physical presence of the officer…to the use of deadly force. Violations of federal law occur when it can be shown that the force used was willfully “unreasonable” or “excessive.
Sexual assaults by officials acting under color of law can happen in jails, during traffic stops, or in other settings where officials might use their position of authority to coerce an individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the person if he or she doesn’t comply.
False arrest and fabrication of evidence: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using authority provided under the color of law is allowed to stop individuals and, under certain circumstances, to search them and retain their property. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power—such as an unlawful detention or illegal confiscation of property—that a violation of a person’s civil rights may occur.
Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process; the Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. During an arrest or detention, these rights can be violated by the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and should not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.

6. Maine Judiciary violating the Fourteenth Amendment, the Eighth Amendment and at least 3 violations of only 6 Canon Rules first hand in Laurie Allen’s court hearings since the arrest on 2/23/2018. The video judge in Two Bridges Correctional Facility, Judge Robert Murray and Judge Everet Fowle.

a. Fourteenth Amendment, the right to due process- To date after many, many dispositional conferences, Laurie Allen has not been given the right to be heard to dismiss pro se and cannot obtain ADA Entwisle’s discovery.

b. Eighth Amendment, prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment- Impossible bail 25k, Video Judge @ TBCF held 25k bail at hearing on 2/27/18, Tuesday. Laurie was not informed of the reduction but still unwarranted of 5k. Also with held was $50 Laurie’s daughter wired into TBCF for Laurie to make phone calls. Laurie was denied access to the law library. Waldo Jail refused to take the bail payment on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday (3/2/18). Laurie was able to get out of TBCF because Laurie got a note with instructions to an outgoing cell mate on Friday, 3/2/18 @ 9am. as the guards watched and listened. TBCF bailed out. Within minutes, Laurie was paged to prepare for transport back to Belfast. Bail had not been accepted by Waldo Jail at that time.

Brutal ankle tracking monitor and travel restrictions have been denied removal by Judge Robert Murray and Judge Everet Fowle at every hearing as pro se. Both in place to date, 7/7/2019, day 473 of cruel brutality and possible cancer causing satellite tracking on Laurie’s skin where Laurie’s father, sister and 2 brothers have died from cancer with Judge Robert Murray unconcerned for Laurie’s health. Judge Robert Murray viewed the DVD video where the ankle monitor made Laurie Allen sick and was alarmed, asking when the video was taken. It was in March 2018 and Laurie has several of the same episodes throughout the 483 days to date July 7, 2019. This video is included in the Exhibit 2 DVD Illness.

c. Canon Rule violations: Evidence is the court’s refusal to hear and dismiss clear fabrication and false arrest.
Last reviewed and edited September 7, 2017 Amendments effective September 5, 2017 MAINE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

MAINE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY NOTE TABLE OF CONTENTS COVERAGE AND EFFECTIVE DATE PREAMBLE TERMINOLOGY CANON 1 A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD AND PROMOTE THE INDEPENDENCE, INTEGRITY, AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE JUDICIARY; SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY; AND SHOULD AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY.

RULE 1.1 Compliance with the Law RULE
1.2 Promotion of Confidence in the Judiciary RULE
1.3 Avoiding Abuse of the Prestige of Judicial Office

CANON 2 A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY, COMPETENTLY, AND DILIGENTLY. RULE
2.1 Giving Precedence to the Duties of Judicial Office
2.2 Impartiality and Fairness; Upholding the Law
2.3 Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment
2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct
2.5 Competence, Diligence, and Cooperation
2.6 Ensuring the Right to Be Heard
2.7 Responsibility to Decide
2.11 Disqualification or Recusal
2.12 Supervisory Duties Disciplinary Responsibilities
2.16 A Judge Shall Comply with Disciplinary Authorities



CANON 3 A JUDGE SHALL CONDUCT THE JUDGE’S PERSONAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OF JUDICIAL OFFICE. RULE
3.1 Extrajudicial Activities in General
3.5 Use of Nonpublic Information
3.6 Affiliation with Discriminatory Organizations
3.7 Participation in Educational, Religious, Charitable, Fraternal, or Civic Organizations and Activities 3.8 Fiduciary Activities
3.9 Service as Arbitrator or Mediator
3.10 Practice of Law
3.11 Financial Activities
3.12 Compensation for Extrajudicial Activities
3.13 Acceptance and Reporting of Gifts, Loans, Bequests, Benefits, or Other Things of Value
3.14 Reimbursement of Expenses and Waivers of Fees or Charges





6. Special motion to dismiss without prejudice, title 14 sec 556 with financial restitution of costs and injury already given to ADA Entwisle.


Justice Schall of the United States Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit) wrote the opinion of the court in 2002 case Graves v. Principi:

“A dismissal without prejudice is a dismissal that occurs without and adjudication on the merits. The dismissal of an action without prejudice leaves the parties as though the action had never been brought...A voluntary dismissal without prejudice leaves the situation as if the action never had been filed.”

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/14/title14sec556.html

§556. Special motion to dismiss

When a moving party asserts that the civil claims, counterclaims or cross claims against the moving party are based on the moving party's exercise of the moving party's right of petition under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of Maine, the moving party may bring a special motion to dismiss. The special motion may be advanced on the docket and receive priority over other cases when the court determines that the interests of justice so require. The court shall grant the special motion, unless the party against whom the special motion is made shows that the moving party's exercise of its right of petition was devoid of any reasonable factual support or any arguable basis in law and that the moving party's acts caused actual injury to the responding party. In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleading and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based. [2011, c. 559, Pt. A, §13 (AMD).]
The Attorney General on the Attorney General's behalf or on behalf of any government agency or subdivision to which the moving party's acts were directed may intervene to defend or otherwise support the moving party on the special motion. [1995, c. 413, §1 (NEW).]
All discovery proceedings are stayed upon the filing of the special motion under this section, except that the court, on motion and after a hearing and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery be conducted. The stay of discovery remains in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the special motion. [1995, c. 413, §1 (NEW).]
The special motion to dismiss may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the court's discretion, at any later time upon terms the court determines proper. [1995, c. 413, §1(NEW).]
If the court grants a special motion to dismiss, the court may award the moving party costs and reasonable attorney's fees, including those incurred for the special motion and any related discovery matters. This section does not affect or preclude the right of the moving party to any remedy otherwise authorized by law. [1995, c. 413, §1 (NEW).]
As used in this section, "a party's exercise of its right of petition" means any written or oral statement made before or submitted to a legislative, executive or judicial body, or any other governmental proceeding; any written or oral statement made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive or judicial body, or any other governmental proceeding; any statement reasonably likely to encourage consideration or review of an issue by a legislative, executive or judicial body, or any other governmental proceeding; any statement reasonably likely to enlist public participation in an effort to effect such consideration; or any other statement falling within constitutional protection of the right to petition government. [1995, c. 413, §1 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
1995, c. 413, §1 (NEW). 2011, c. 559, Pt. A, §13 (AMD).

Exhibit #3
Title 14 sec 556 Maine Court Hearings and Anti-Slapp Per Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, No. Docket: Han-07-133, Schelling v. Lindell:

A. Application-
6- “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, is designed to guard against meritless lawsuits brought with the intention of chilling or deterring the free exercise of the defandant’s First Amendment right to petition the government by threatening would-be activists with litigation costs. Morse Bros., Inc. v. Webster, 2001 ME 70, 10, 772A.2d 842,846. The anit-SLAPP statute provides defendants who are the targets of such suits with a “special motion to dismiss,” a statutory motion designed to minimize the litigation costs associated with the defense of such merit-less suits. Id., 15,7 772A2.d at 848.

7- To prevail on a special motion to dismiss, the defendant carries the initial burden to show that the suit was based on some activity that would qualify as an exercise of the defendant’s First Amendment right to petition the government. 14 M.R.S. sec 556. Once the defendant demonstrates that this is the basis for the suit, and therefore that the statute applies, the burden falls on the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant’s activity (1) was without “reasonable factual support,” (2) was without an “arguable
basis in law,” and (3) resulted in actual injury to the plaintiff.. Id.

8- We allow interlocutory appeals from denials of special motions to dismiss *1230 brought pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute because a failure to grant review of these decisions at this stage would impose additional litigation costs on defendants, the very harm the statute seeks to avoid, and would result in a loss of defendants’ susbstantial rights. Morse Bros., 2001 ME 70, 15, 772 A.2dat 848,

11- Maine’s anti-SLAPP statute very broadly defines the exercise of the “right to petition.” The statute includes within the definition of petitioning activity: Any statement to a legislative, executive or judicial body;

*Any statement made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a governmental entity;

*Any statement likely to encourage consideration or review of an issue by a governmental entity;

*Any statement likely to enlist public participation in encouraging a government body to consider a particular issue; and

*Any other statement falling within constitutional protection of the right to petition the governement.

21- To clarify the nature of the injury Schelling would be required to show in order to give rise to compensable damages for purely emotional or psychic harm under the anti-SLAPP statute, we briefly review the development of the compensability of emotional damages.

22- There was a time when purely emotional injury was not compensable in Maine unless the plaintiff had also suffered some physical harm or contact as a result of the tortfeasor’s conduct. See Herrick v. Evening Express Publ’g Co., 120 Me. 138, 113 A. 16 (1921). Over the past thirty years however, we have moved away significantly from the strict common law limitation. We began the modernization of emotional damage compensability in Maine with our decision in Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc., 269 A.2d 117 (Me. 1970). In that case, we held that purely emotional or psychic suffering, if borth “severe” and manifested by some “objective 1233 symptomatology” (such as nausea) could *1233 be compensable. Id. At 121. At that time, we concluded that the demonstration of objective symptomatology associated with the plaintiff’s emotional distress was a necessary bulwark against a deluge of fraudulent and spurious claims of emotional injury. Id.

24- The rule that emerged from Culbert was a simple one that allowed compensation for emotional harm that was “serious” provided that all other elements of the tort claim were satisfied. Id. We held that “serious mental distress” existed “where a reasonable person, normally constituted, would be unable to adequately cope with the mental stress engendered by the circumstance of the event.” Id.

25- Following the Culbert decision, the rule regarding the types of emotional injuries compensable in Maine has remained substantially the same. Since that time, we have clarified the foundational aspects of compensable emotional harm by explicitly concluding that minor emotional injuries, such as hurt feelings, are not compensable. Gammom v. Osteopathic Hosp. Of Me., Inc., 534 A.2d 1282, 1285 (Me. 1987). In other words, we have made it clear there is no recognition of damage to an “eggshell psyche” in Maine. Id. Most recently, in Curtis v. Porter, we reiterated that emotional distress alone is not compensable unless it is “so severe that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it.” 2001 ME 158, 10, 784 A.2d 18, 23 (citation omitted).

https://sosen.org/blog/2016/08/01/second-look-at-are-gps-ankle-bracelets-harming-people-that-are-forced-to-wear-them.html

Second look at ” Are GPS ankle bracelets harming people that are forced to wear them?

by Will Bassler • August 1, 2016 • 5 Comments
The base of this article was posted in November of 2013 here on SOSEN, since then new information has come to light and we have added it Updated Info:
The courts have the knowledge that shaming is a form of punishment as defined by the Court cases of People v. Meyer and People v. Lowe, 606 N.E.2d. People v. Molz, 113 N.E.2d, People v. Johnson 528 N.E.2d, State v. Burdin 924 S.W.2d ,People v. Letterlough 655 N.E.2d, Lindsay v. State 606 So. 2D..
One of the unintended consequences of placing GPS on people is the demoralizing effect that it has on them and how they can go into a emotional and mental down spiral because of having to explain why they have something strapped to their ankle.
“Eighty-nine percent of probation officers surveyed by the Justice Department felt that “offenders’ relationships with their significant others changed because of being monitored.” Both officers and those monitored observed that the ankle band had a distinct impact on children. As one parent testified, “When it beeps, the kids worry about whether the probation officer is coming to take me to jail. The kids run for it when it beeps.” Another noted that his child repeatedly strapped a watch around his ankle “to be like Daddy.””
So beyond the health risks there is also a risk to mental health of people that are subjected to the unconstitutional invasion into their privacy, our Supreme Court has said that placing a GPS on a person or their property is in fact a violation of constitutional standards.  At the present time one of the ways that the Parole and Probation department is getting away with this as they are forcing a person to sign a waiver. If they don’t sign the waiver they will be imprisoned, so they are forcing someone to give up a constitutional right the right to privacy by coercion. The fact is this opens up parole and probation not only to civil rights constitutional tort lawsuits under USC 1983. There is also the possible federal charges being placed against them as individuals under title 18 of the United States codes.
Since this article was originally posted in November of 2013 new information has come out about the detrimental effects of having cell phone radiation. Remember unlike cell phone radiation that someone gets from picking up and using their cell phone for a couple hours a day we are talking about a device that transmits cell phone radiation 24 hours a day seven days a week, so the short and long-term effects may well be a thousandfold more than someone who has a cell phone and uses it. According to the latest research a person is three fold more likely to end up with a brain tumor if they use their cell phone more than 900 hours within their lifetime that means they would reach that 900 hours using their cell phone for 2 1/2 hours a day within one year or in the case of an ankle monitor that is on 24 hours a day, seven days a week they would reach that 900 hours within 38 days of having it strapped on. Obviously having a strap to your ankle you’re not looking at brain tumors but in the case of having strapped to your ankle there is a high possibility for skin cancer as well as bone cancer, not to mention the fact that cell phone radiations have been proven to restrict blood flow. Take a look at the articles below that not only look at the danger of cell phone radiation but the effectiveness, reliability and psychological damage to people that have had these things strapped to their ankles.
There is also the old comment of follow the money, take a look at how much money is spent on lobbying our governmental officials as well as campaign contributions that has been done by owners and board members of companies that manufacture these devices, not to mention the other organizations that the same people sat on the boards of directors of who are also doing lobbying and contributing to politicians.
Here is a simple question that may have long-term effects and may bring about lawsuits costing the state governments billions of dollars for their total disregard of human safety.
The question is, quite simply, is the forced use of GPS ankle bracelets that transmit information over cell phone frequencies causing damage to the people that are forced to wear them and did the manufacturers of these devices include FCC warning tags that were disregarded by the people placing these on the people who are required to wear them?
Realize that some countries have gone so far as to ban the use of cell phones around pregnant mothers, and may not be used anywhere close to a child.

Cell Phone Radiation Lawsuits:
Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes new study finding
cell phone radiation may cause brain tissue damage.

In a press release issued March of this year, Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing clients in cell phone radiation lawsuits, notes that a new study has found that radiation from cell phones may cause damage to brain tissue.
According to a report from the Daily Mail, researchers with Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority found that one hour of cell phone radiation can cause cells in blood vessel walls to shrink, allowing potentially harmful substances in the blood to ‘leak’ into the brain. The two-year study also found that repeated exposure to cell phone radiation could make the blood-brain barrier more permeable, leading to increased brain damage. “Repeated occurrences of these events on a daily basis, over a long period of time, could become a health hazard due to possible accumulation of brain tissue damage,” the study authors concluded.*

This research is just further evidence that exposure to cell phone radiation can affect the brain in harmful waysWe agree with the study authors that more research on this issue is urgently needed”, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The Firm is currently investigating the link between cell phones and brain cancer, and is part of a small consortium of law firms actively representing plaintiffs in cell phone radiation lawsuits.



Nevertheless I Persist Joi Z #1



473rd Day Shackling Innocent Brave Mom taking on the Maine System JustUs 4 More v. JustMe
6/27/2019 Nine Years of 58. Strong Truth. Yo Todd Beamer Let's Roll!
 6/30/19 This 9/13/2018 video proves constitutional treason by the State of Maine lawless enforcers, protected by JustUs. I hang in there as they continue to try and silence me. In any capacity, any facility, failure after failure. Mentally beating me down since corrupt doors began slamming shut when I asked for the first public document for Seaveiw Terrace in May 2011 with Belfast City Planner Wayne Marshall, City Manager Joe Slocum, City Council, and City Attorney Bill Kelly. Then AG Janet Mills, supported Belfast City Hall against my foia requests of 7 years. City Hall stating that they have given me the documents but I am t too ignorant to know. I'm not the one who is ill. I moved into the Cuckoo's Nest. 
 https://youtu.be/-B4NIjf3I08 
Abutting lot, 23 Seaview Terrace, has garage on boundary line, built prior to 1994. Out of compliance- 20 ft side set back. Illegal sale of illegal lot in 5/2017 to Mark Rae, Penny Rae Cameron, BO Cameron. They illegally claim my property to get the house/medical office? illegally built protection of Belfast police, Waldo Sheriff, Judge Worth, City Hall. Chief McFadden refused to give me a cease harassment notice from 5/2017-9/2017 with many video's of threats, trespass, vandalizing, destruction of property, etc. Instead he gave them on against me to fabricate evidence and 2 charges, summons on 10/23/17 and falsely arrested 11/1/17.  I was falsely arrested again on 2/23/18, charged with terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. I did not and all charges still have not been heard in court for easy dismissal as of June 2019! In  May 2018 I won a protection order, pro se against Mark Rae by Deputy Chief Judge Susan Sparaco. Rae stated in court that he has not ever seen and does not have the survey he claims to have to take my property. BPD cannot get involved in civil boundary disputes but does to protect the illegal JustUs people. Here I am proving my boundaries and Richards is going to arrest me for parking on my property in the city right of way. Then goes over to Mark Rae to bond. Regardless of court protection order police enforce lawlessness. 2 days prior, 9/11/18 Detective Greeley made me sign contract to force me to pay $150 a month for the ankle shackle to make me look like a convict. 

  https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/02683940610713262... Findings: Personality disorders a.re a source of a highly toxic and dysfunctional organizational behavior; borderline personality disorder in a leader may serve as a systemic contaminant for an organization. ...

Public Corruption


The Costs of Public Corruption – And The Need for the Public to Fight Back
by Patrick Fitzgerald
U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois...
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 10:19 AM
To: LAURIE ALLEN; rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; Jeffrey Trafton; chief@belfastmepd.org; district1@waldocountyme.gov; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; Thomas Shehan; attorney.general@maine.gov; William Entwisle; Governor; mayor@cityofbelfast.org
Cc: mvogelzang@mainepublic.org; cbeck@mainepublic.org; mstewart@ap.org; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; channan@mainepublic.org; gmaxwell@mainepublic.org; rholt@mainepublic.org; cmorrissey@mainepublic.org; kshortall@mainepublic.org; jmandrake@mainepublic.org; tmailloux@wcgh.org; Democracy Now!
Subject: Ofcr Gibbs/crisis wrkr/Monitor Fee Mailed 6/28
 

 To All,

The monthly $150  fee to track me is in the mail today to be received prior to due date of 7/12/2019. Yesterday I think Officer Gibbs was at house banging away at my door as I was in bed around noontime. I was not expecting any visitors and I did not get up but the knocker was persistent, banging harder and harder. Then someone began yelling my name. Then a restricted call was missed on my phone and there was not any message left. I did send an email to find out if there was a law enforcement problem with me.

As I was typing this, there was another knock at the door. It was Officer Gibbs and a crisis worker to check on me. I went outside and video taped most of the conversation. After seeing I was healthy, calm, eating and sleeping they asked me if I was taking medication. I told them that was personal. I had remembered asking my attorney, Tom Shehan if medications could be forced. Officer Gibbs and the crisis worker said that if I don't answer questions to medication or seeing a provider that they will have to come check on me frequently. I said OK. I don't understand why as I don't go anywhere and comply with bail conditions and am law abiding. This seems to be a violation of my rights and privacy, but I will comply. I asked Officer Gibbs if he was the one banging away at my door yesterday. He said yes and had the crisis worker with him. I asked him why didn't he leave a message when he called and I would have came outside. I asked him to let me know in the future when he was coming. He said he would.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen
https://youtu.be/d9Pa8Rgpb3A
6/28/19 10:30am Belfast PD- Gibbs? & Crisis Worker come fishing again. Since I was sold this undisclosed hell on 6/28/2010, the unwelcome won't stop coming to my home and property. I just wanted to start my new life under all radar and heal with my children. Privately and rightfully. My property is the Standing Rock of Belfast. I am the  protectHer. 

6/14/2019 10:40 am 2pm Within an hour of sending out a massive 6/12 email (today's email 6/14/2019 of the thread is now first) of Belfast and Waldo County lawless enforcement fabricating charges and false arrests against me from 9/2017-2/23/2018, Waldo Sheriff's dept. Detective Greeley and ? come to my house stating my ankle trackher is showing a breech. A lie. They were hoping to say I was not stable and to take me into psychiatric hospitalization. But I was filming. Phew. They can't stop my truth so they want to paint me crazy. Mom moved into the Cuckoo's Nest. Shackle that bird. 458 days as of 6/12/19 .  Sick JustUs.

Chief McFadden is very dangerous (see below proof from Peter Taber, 40 yr reporter of Belfast Police Beat) Cheif McFadden trying to convince my daughter to instutionalize me. Lying shamelessy as Peter writes, "a knuckle dragging thug". Using my children to silence Mom's proof of horrifyig corruption. He writes I do not pose a threat to myself or others while fabricating evidence, false arrests to slander me as a terrorist on 2/23/18, confident that I would be done with. Probably would print that I committed suicide like Sandra Bland brutal arrest and "suicide" for changing lanes. https://www.npr.org/2019/05/07/721086944/sandra-blands-phone-video-of-her-own-arrest-surfaces-reviving-calls-for-new-inqu

My daughter lives thousands of miles away and I did not talk to my children about this hell. Leave children alone! McFadden and those that use my children to silence me are very ill. After I spoke at the first open to the public Belfast City Council meeting on 11/1/11, police were ordered. Officer Wark and Chief McFadden had told me several times to be concerned for my children. I told them my children are off limits and even went to the police station in the video begging McFadden to leave all children alone. This was after he fabricated evidence on a video that is not available charging me with harassing Mark Rae a few days before. He doesn't want to talk to me. None of them do. I'm true.
From: Michael McFadden <chief@belfastmepd.org>
Subject: RE: Regarding Laurie Allen
Date: October 20, 2017 at 7:35:35 AM PDT
To: My daughter

... It's been obvious to me for a number of years that your mom is suffering from untreated mental illness. There are a couple of things that prevent me from being an effective part in addressing those issues for her. First and foremost, it's my strong opinion that your mother would not be willing to seek treatment voluntarily. I have engaged her in conversation a few years ago when she would actually speak with me, and she was highly offended that I was even suggesting she should try speaking with someone. I may be wrong, but there's nothing she's done or said in the last 5 years that I've known her, which would indicate that I am wrong. Second absent her agreeing to accept help, we would be forced to take her into protective custody involuntarily in order to have a physiological evaluation done. In order for me to do this I would first have to determine she is a danger to herself or someone else. At this time I don't feel I can argue effectively that she presents an actual danger to herself or others. She's created considerable inconvenience to a number of people but she has also been very careful not to overtly threaten them. I have a tremendous amount of experience dealing with individuals suffering from mental illness, and although your mother is struggling she simply isn't going to meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization in the typical way. Ultimately however, it's my strong belief that hospitalization is exactly what your mother needs. 

This situation is not a typical one. Unfortunately the people who are best positioned to help your mother are the very people she's convinced are evil and out to get her. I know this is part of her mental illness and I personally take no offense to the things she says because of that. But my fear is that she simply won't trust me nor any of the officers here. She's also convinced the hospital along with the doctors and administrators of it are corrupt as well. 

Honestly in evaluating the entire situation I believe her family (you and your brother) may be the best people at this time to get her the help she needs. I would suggest speaking with someone at Maine Behavioral Healthcare (207-338-2295) to see what options are there for you. I'm more than happy to assist you in whatever way you think I might be able to. It might be beneficial for you to mention that I'd be more than happy to talk with any of the case workers who you speak with at MBH, sometimes it makes a difference if they understand the background and type of behavior we're seeing from a public safety point of view. 

If you'd like to speak with me directly please feel free to call (207-338-5255) 

Chief McFadden.
Then Attorney General Janet Trafton Mills motioned in 1/2018 for a Title 15 Psych eval to deem me incompetent to dismiss the then 2 harassment charges. Terrororzing with a dangerous weapon was yet to come on 2/23/18. I've won several court cases pro se. The closer was the protection order I won against Mark Rae, pro se.
Title 15 denied.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:22 AM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Notice Hearing

Tom,

Please respond to all, 1-5 today. This is is very troubling.
  1. Are you stating that you do not have ADA Entwisle's discovery for the State's charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon and filed a motion for dismissal of this charge against my instructions? 
  2. Advise when I will receive via EMAIL via PDF as you have done with the incomplete harassment discoveries, the complete discoveries, with the cover page reflecting the docket #, charge and how many total pages for each discovery of the 3 charges, 2- harassment, 1- terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. It is incomprehensible that the ADA charged me in 2017 and 2018 and I cannot get the discoveries as of 6/28//2019. You should have legal recourse for this as my defense attorney and should have demanded these when you became my defense attorney almost 2 months ago.
  3. Please confirm motions you had filed without my consent have been withdrawn legally. To my knowledge there were  2. One for bail conditions to remove ankle monitor and travel restrictions and the 2nd was to dismiss terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. If these motions are still in the court system after you advised my that you withdrew them, withdraw them immediately today and confirm with court clerk Brooke Otis that they are withdrawn. 
  4. Please email me confirmation that you spoke today to court clerk Brooke Otis and confirms that there are not any motions filed on my behalf for my 3 charges, 2 harassment, 1 terrorizing with a dangerous weapon, or any other charges in the Maine Judiciary system.
  5. Please explain how the court hearing for a dispositional conference is 7/23/2019 without any motions filed on my behalf. 
Thank you.

Laurie Allen

2:30 pm No response from Sgt. Gibbs or anyone. I haven't left my home today. I just rec'd an email from my court appointed attorney, Tom Shehan advising me that the 2017 2 fabricated harassment charges and false terrorizing with a dangerous weapon charges will have another dispositional conference on 7/23/19 @ 10:30am. Tom has yet to send me the discovery for the terrorizing charge from the ADA and the discoveries for the harassment charges are incomplete and full of holes. I'm on my 6th request for these. What a waste of tax dollars to cover up such clear corruption. 9 years of my life is worth protecting rights. My civic duty.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:30 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Notice Hearing
 

Tom,

How can there be a hearing when motions have not been filed for dismissal because you are not sending the discovery for terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. You must have that since you filed that motion on it and I had you withdraw it. When are you sending it?

Laurie

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 12:41 PM
To: chief@belfastmepd.org; Jeffrey Trafton; 'James Greeley'; rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; Governor; attorney.general@maine.gov; Thomas Shehan; William Entwisle; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; LAURIE ALLEN
Cc: mvogelzang@mainepublic.org; cbeck@mainepublic.org; mstewart@ap.org; Democracy Now!; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; channan@mainepublic.org; gmaxwell@mainepublic.org; rholt@mainepublic.org; cmorrissey@mainepublic.org; kshortall@mainepublic.org; jmandrake@mainepublic.org; VillageSoup; tmailloux@wcgh.org
Subject: Re: Protest illegal City of Belfast Work

To All,

I was sleeping when I heard someone calling my name. I went to the window, I did not see any police cars or any cars. I thought I saw Sargent Gibbs but I am not sure. I just checked my phone and saw I missed a restricted call, no message was left.

If there is any problem, please email or leave a message at xxx--xxxx and I will respond. Thank you.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen 

I notified PBS of MPBN refusal to interview me.
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:13 AM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: http://www.pbs.org/publiceditor/feedback/


 Sent 6/25/19 7:10am
Submit Your Comments
Thank you for submitting your comments!

 2nd Req mvogelzang@mainepublic.org cbeck@mainepublic.org Mark Vogelzang, CEO/President of Maine PUBLIC Broadcasting Network,

PLEASE respond via email. Please interview me. Thank you.


Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen
17 Seaview Terrace
Belfast, Me 04915

 www.boycottbelfast.blogspot.com   www.04915.blogspot.com  6/24/19 Little Laurie Allen, a 58 year old brave, innocent Mom, 470th day shackled with MPBN/PBS VP neighbor Charles Beck witness. Charles and MPBN President Mark Vogelzang  are not responding to my email (below) sent last Monday, 6/17/19 for an interview. Deadly details over nine years of solely protecting my home from mob mentality local to State, some neighbors, some businesses, MaineHealth, the list goes on, first hand.  Interview facts, do your job. Interview truth, alive not dead. Chief McFadden and lawless enforcement cuff me out of my home, 4 times to date since 11/1/2017, 70 days taken during 2/23/18-3/8/19 after escaping death at Two Bridges Correctional Facility 3/2/18 weekend. Then the lawless come into my home when they have me in their custody and take whatever they want, bank safes, documents, plant camera's I'm sure, infiltrate my internet, my bank, my children, take, take, take, below poverty Hobo Mom won't break. Blogging is my only protection. 
July 22, 20188:12 AM ET
Heard on Weekend Edition Sunday JOANNA KAKISSIS

(see 6/26/2019 email below pictures for the email to all with no response)
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 9:16 AM
To: chief@belfastmepd.org; Jeffrey Trafton; 'James Greeley'; rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; Governor; attorney.general@maine.gov; Thomas Shehan; William Entwisle; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; LAURIE ALLEN
Cc: mvogelzang@mainepublic.org; cbeck@mainepublic.org; mstewart@ap.org; Democracy Now!; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; channan@mainepublic.org; gmaxwell@mainepublic.org; rholt@mainepublic.org; cmorrissey@mainepublic.org; kshortall@mainepublic.org; jmandrake@mainepublic.org; VillageSoup; tmailloux@wcgh.org
Subject: Re: Protest illegal City of Belfast Work

To All,

I have not received any response. Therefore, I will be protesting for my life with my big Boycott Belfast sign in my zone on Northport Ave on the sidewalk in front of MaineHealth Waldo County General Hospital peacefully. Please do not harass, harm or take me out again.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen

2012 Memorial Day Parade, Belfast, Maine. Laurie Allen holds American Flag high, peace sign with other hand. Behind Belfast City Council Mary Mortier and Mayor Walter Ash. Corrupt P.U.


June 6 2019 Governor Mills & Chief McFadden shackle innocent Mom for exposing corruption to MY property and family, solo. 452 days, charging me $5 a day for trackher in her home. Break her, below poverty @ 18k a year. Nevertheless she persists.Freedom of Speech is key. Fear of Speech is their forte'. I speak. Always. Fabricated charges/terrorizing with a dangerous weapon and harassment in 2017, Yet to heard by a Judge because it's immediate dismissal of all. Attempts to end my life failed. I stay home for protection. It works. I'm still alive and waiting for dismissal. I bet no Judge wants to touch this anymore. ADA Entwisle Dismiss Completely Special Legislature Title 14 Section 556. Proof down below Charles Beck, MPBN VP and corrupt neighbor. Helping them to silence me. With a smile of course. Good Morning Laurie Allen.

Charles Beck, Mr. Feign
    How do you spell integrity?
#5-38sec  https://youtu.be/xyGOU_3Gjp0
#4-1min17sec   https://youtu.be/6gCYONsSobk 
2pm 6/25/19 City worker on Iphone waiting for special soil for Charles at our expense 
#3-3min24sec https://youtu.be/BTnDfPGt7FE
Charles Beck MPBN VP is Special
City of Belfast Illegal Drainage Work on his  Private Property 6/25/2019
#2-45sec https://youtu.be/R7-CffzBAmo
Penny Rae Cameron, BO Cameron, Mark Rae Kayla Cameron LaCombe Specials of JustUs on the abutting and taking 15 ft of my property with hate crimes and police protection since 2017 Wellman Paving to pave! Where did big, bad Cameron Paving Go Bo?
#1-33sec. https://youtu.be/1sJlGSX3xAk



From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 10:35 AM
To: chief@belfastmepd.org; Jeffrey Trafton; 'James Greeley'; rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; Governor; attorney.general@maine.gov; LAURIE ALLEN; Thomas Shehan; William Entwisle; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov
Cc: mvogelzang@mainepublic.org; cbeck@mainepublic.org; mstewart@ap.org; Democracy Now!; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; channan@mainepublic.org; gmaxwell@mainepublic.org; rholt@mainepublic.org; cmorrissey@mainepublic.org; kshortall@mainepublic.org; jmandrake@mainepublic.org; VillageSoup; tmailloux@wcgh.org
Subject: Protest illegal City of Belfast Work


To Belfast Chief McFadden, Waldo County Sheriff Trafton, Governor Trafton Mills, Attorney General Frey, Pre-trial Case Manager Otto, Attorney Shehan, ADA Entwisle, Belfast Senator Herbig, and Belfast Mayor Paradis,

For the second consecutive day, the City of Belfast Public Works is performing illegal work at 18 Seaview Terrace. I am not filing any complaint as the police protect law breakers and arrest me. I video taped some of the work with some short narrative of the history of Belfast City Hall corruption since I was sold this undisclosed hell on 6/28/2010 after not making one error. It was my only chance of a chance in hell to win hotly contested relocation from Exit 9, South River, NJ to Belfast, Maine 04915. I did it. Alone.

I do all I can legally do to expose the enormous corruption to my little life and property at 17 Seaview Terrace. Maine media set fire to me after Chief McFadden had me illegally arrested again on 2/23/18 and sent out a private youtube video of an innocent, freedom of speech/expression October 2017 target shoot that was of no threat to anyone. Until McFadden made it one. I was not supposed to get out of Two Bridges Correctional Facility and it is proven regardless of any evidence the lawless can destroy and deny. I do not break the law and I comply. After 9 years, Belfast-State of Maine have fabricated charges and arrests, 4 times coming to my house with several lawless to show me who's boss. Brutally cuffing me and taking me out of my home, just like that. They have my keys and many items of importance are missing from my home. My dogs have been traumatized again and again. The last stint where McFadden had me taken out illegally for 60 days on 1/8/2019 @ 10:30am. I had no one to care for my dogs and I didn't know if I would ever be free or even live. I told the lawless that my dogs would have to be put down if I wasn't come home that night. Put me down, apparently no problem. Putting dogs down, apparently is. McFadden chose to call my brother, George Allen, VP, General Manager of Beeline Cable, Madison, Maine and give my dogs to him. I did not know anything. I assumed my loves of 12 years were dead. 

Today is day 472 that I have been shackled and motions to dismiss since 2017 of 2 fabricated harassment charges and terrorizing with a dangerous weapon were refused to be heard as I represented myself pro se.  January 2018, then AG Mills had ADA Entwisle motion for a title 15 psychiatric forensic evaluation against me to find me incompetent to represent myself in court for easy dismissal. My ex husband tried the same tactics during my divorce from him 2005-2007. I agreed to the family psychiatric examination by the guardian ad litem, Dr Rosenbaum. Paid for by my ex (I left my job of 13 years with Baxter to raise our children in 1995), I didn't have income anymore. Indentured Mom and I gave my savings to the marriage. Rosenbaum gave his best shot to break me down and find just one thing wrong with me and give the children to ex. Rosenbaum actually told me with awe- "There is nothing wrong with you." 

Judge Robert Murray finally heard ADA's Title 15 motion on 6/6/18 at Waldo Superior Court. The entire busy bottom floor was evacuated. No security guards or security scanners. No employees. The Superior Court room was turned into a paneled small court room upon entry. The descending stairs and beautiful dome ceiling were not visible. I always come alone as pro se. This time I brought my 21 year old, scholarly Jr @ Rutgers with me. I feared they may take me into psychiatric holding, it's not hard to follow tactics. I did not think it was to be the end. Murray was clearly shocked to see a witness and even more so after he kept questioning the relationship to me. After I was forced to tell Murray, he took a break from the bench. Clearly needing advice on how to proceed since my son would be witness, He eventually came back and stated the order of motions. The title 15- Murray had to deny it because I had just won a protection order against Mark Rae (the one Chief McFadden protects and fabricated 2 harassment charges and 2 arrests against me in October and November 2017) in May 2018, pro se with Deputy Chief Judge Susan Sparaco. ADA Entwisle bowed his head to the table on that one. I saw him. Murray denied bail conditions to remove brutal shackle and travel restrictions. Murray never heard the motions to dismiss all charges. He abruptly called recess and never came back. I was never advised of another court hearing. 

On July 24, 2018, Tuesday I was at Waldo Jail for the weekly check in with pretrial case manager Rick Otto. I go in with my protest sign and listen to others of their illegal arrests. In come 3 police officers and grab me. Again brutally cuff me and put me into the jail. Although my motions to dismiss had yet to be heard, I apparently was indicted by a grand jury and failed to appear for a jury pick on 7/23/18 which turned out to be false day. Judge Fowle had said that when I appeared for that arrest in District Court in August. That charge was not on the docket. Instead, all 3 charges, 2 harassment and 1 terrorizing. I thought they may try that and I came prepared with my motions, exhibits and proof of truth, pro se. Fowle and Entwisle were communicating in brief words, nevertheless I persisted. Fowle said 7/23 was a non-court day and asked Entwisle if my $500 bail for that false arrest on 7/24 was to be returned. Entwisle quickly said no and shut it down. If my friend did not post that bail, I would have been sent to Two Bridges again and this time they may have succeeded in eternally silencing my freedom of speech. 

They have railroaded me into taking a court appointed attorney refusing my rights to be heard pro se since 12/8/2017 and many dispositional conferences, wasting enormous tax dollars to contain and silence me. The State pays for these attorneys, do you see the problem for me? Follow the money. Tom Shehan is the 3rd court appointed attorney and has yet to give me ADA's Entwisle's discovery for the terrorizing charge and has given me what appears to be partial discoveries on the harassment charges where the evidence for both is a video that is not available. 

I will be mailing out the $150 monthly charge I must pay to the County of Waldo to be shackled today. It is due the 12th of each month but they manipulate receipt to try and find me in violation of bail and back to jail. Patterned targeting, 24/7. 70 days of confinement in their hands. Nevertheless, I persist. Legally.

I will be protesting within my travel zone in front of Waldo County General Hospital. I am restricted from the City Park abutting the hospital to all of downtown and beyond out to Swan Lake and Hurleyville, no left onto Route 1 south from Seaview Terrace. No access to vet, gas and milk across the street at Irvings, my annual beautiful flowers from Aubuchon, no auto parts store in Belfast, not even my drugstore. Take back roads to get to Bayside, I'm allowed back on Route 1 at Cross Street and Rte 1. I am not driving on any back roads and ONLY go to Hannaford bi-weekly for food. I almost got myself arrested when my court appointed attorney Tom Shehan told me to meet with him at Waldo Judiciary Center to discuss my case. I would have thought it would have been at his office in Searsport. I was just about to turn at McDonald's to go downtown and suddenly remembered that making that left would put me in the restricted zone, shackle violation and I would have been gone girl again. I called Tom's office, the court and Rick Otto. Tom eventually called back after I got home and had me meet him at Bell the Cat. I would have thought his office was more appropriate but I went. That was a scary close call. For what? I'm not the threat, truth is.

I will be walking with my sign and perhaps talking out loud as I walk. I do not speak to anyone directly unless someone speaks to me. I tell the truth of first hand lawlessness in Belfast to me, my family and my property that extends to State government agencies and Judiciary. Please advise of any issues with the same peaceful protesting (no music this time) that I have been doing since 2011. Way back then, Chief McFadden told me I was the hi-lite of his day when Belfast City Council fabricated me as a threat and I was interrogated and cleared. McFadden later told me downtown when I was protesting outside the real estate agency then Town and Country, now Masiello Group, where Earl Black (owner) and agents Bill Ingersoll and Jan Andrews sold my new life to undisclosed hell for a couple of grand. Maine Realtor Commission corruptly dismissed my compliant of non-disclosure water slaughter hell and epic proof.

Chief McFadden smiled and stated that he didn't have any problem with my signs as long as his name wasn't on there. I told him tOK as long as he didn't do anything illegal. I had no idea of the evil until years later when I read Peter Taber's (a 40 year reporter for the Belfast Police Beat) comment in the Bangor Daily News when I googled McFadden to see if there was information. I was sick. I'm a dead Mom walking and still talking. That's who I am. My brother George knows. Dismiss, make financial amends, then take my house as planned. I'm gone. Or keep me contained until I persist no more. I must comply. Never a record in my 58 years until fabricated and globally shamed as a terrorist Mom by Chief McFadden. Mom Flew Into The Cuckoo's Nest.

Mark Vogelzang, CEO, President of MPBN is not responding to last weeks request for an interview. I 2nd requested the request yesterday. Video of Belfast Public Works at my neighbor's house is on my blog. It is a problem for public media, freedom of speech and saddens me. The abutters of my property that fabricated evidence and harassment, Mark Rae, Penny Rae Cameron, BO Cameron, Kayla Cameron LaCombe and workers will begin paving. I don't know if they will be taking my 15 feet of property in the paving (they needed the 15 feet to build the house or medical office on the lot. It is now built since their hate crimes against me to take my property began in 5/2017. There is nothing I can do but protest and exercise my constitutional rights, number one being freedom of speech. Document, protest, talk, email and blog. JustMe v. JustUs.  

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen
17 Seaview Terrace
Belfast, Maine 04915

6/24/19 Little Laurie Allen, a 58 year old brave, innocent Mom, 470th day shackled with MPBN/PBS VP neighbor Charles Beck witness. Charles and MPBN President Mark Vogelzang  are not responding to my email (below) sent last Monday, 6/17/19 for an interview. Deadly details over nine years of solely protecting my home from mob mentality local to State, some neighbors, some businesses, MaineHealth, the list goes on, first hand.  Interview facts, do your job. Interview truth, alive not dead. Chief McFadden and lawless enforcement cuff me out of my home, 4 times to date since 11/1/2017, 70 days taken during 2/23/18-3/8/19 after escaping death at Two Bridges Correctional Facility 3/2/18 weekend. Then the lawless come into my home when they have me in their custody and take whatever they want, bank safes, documents, plant camera's I'm sure, infiltrate my internet, my bank, my children, take, take, take, below poverty Hobo Mom won't break. Blogging is my only protection. 
The last time Matthew Caruana Galizia saw his mother alive, she was going to the bank.
A government minister had gotten the courts to freeze her bank accounts. She intended to fight for access to her funds.
"If someone tried to shut her up, if someone tried to stop her, she'd just fight back even harder," the son says. "That was her spirit."
Daphne Caruana Galizia was an investigative reporter, a towering, intense mother of three, digging up dirt on the most powerful figures in Malta, the European Union's smallest member state.
Thousands read her blog, Running Commentary, in this golden-walled island nation of fewer than half a million people, located between Libya and Italy.
On Oct. 16, 2017, a warm, heavy day in Bidnija, the northern village where she lived with her lawyer husband in their garden-encircled home, she typed her blog's final words: "There are crooks everywhere you look now. The situation is desperate." ...

6/19/19 7:30pm Emails & Call to Tom to withdraw unacceptable motion. See below for email to court appointed attorney Tom Shehan who is not following my request to prepare motions for my review to approve for dismissal of ALL charges Two 2017 fabricated cease harassment and One 1rst Amendment Freedom of Speech for NOT terrorizing with a dangerous weapon target shoot 2017. 

See below for 6/17/2019 email to MPBN CEO and VP (my neighbor, Charles Beck)

New Belfast police chief selected
By Abigail Curtis, BDN Staff
Posted Dec. 20, 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
Belfast native Michael McFadden III, who worked for the Belfast Police Department for 19 years before joining the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit.McFadden, who joined the Computer Crimes Unit two yeas ago, is well-placed to do that, Slocum said.While there, the former Belfast Police Department detective investigated Internet pornography cases.

A sad choice. This knuckle-dragging thug doesn't have any trouble lying shamelessly if he thinks it might gain a conviction. His father, a longtime Belfast police officer who merited wide respect, must be spinning in his grave at how his son turned out. Of course, take this opinion as you might.I was only a police reporter for over 40 years, can hardly be called a cop-hater, and yet I witnessed first-hand how low-down he has behaved.

maine_seashore 

He physically beats false confessions out of people being arrested...just ask Mike Hall ;)

Peter Taber is now activist and owner of https://searsportshores.com/

Each time I leave my home there is a chance that I will not return. They have driven nails
into my tires, vandalized my boat, trailer, steal personal property, destroy my property, hate crimes, the list goes on.There is no one that would notice that I am not home until possibly days later leaving my beagles home alone. For their well being, I will leave my garage door open each time I have to leave. I leave only when necessary for food,court and appt.'s. My 2005 F150 is in the garage with a nail in it's tire since last summer, patched but leaking. If the garage door is still open, into the evening and my 2002 Explorer is not in the driveway with my beagles at the window, then something is wrong. Please contact my brother, George Allen, VP General Manager of Beeline Cable, Madison,
Maine. http://www.getbeeline.com/ 800-439-4611.

Thank you. 17 Seaview Terrace, Belfast. MaineHealth annex is in my backyard. Waldo County General Hospital is across the street (Northport Ave.) from my street. Seaview Terror. laurieallen55@msn.com Whistleblower Mom does not get coverage or protection. Time to write my book. https://www.cbs.com/shows/whistleblower/

After I posted this email, several portions were hacked to a green font that I have changed back to black. The green portions were of the Kevin Page video's, where Chief McFadden is mentioned and the Harvard Law Freedom of Speech, 1rst Amendment proving my innocence. Chief Mcfadden as prior Maine State Detective Internet Porn with his brother-in-law, Belfast Spectrum Tech Tom have internet hacking ease.)

https://youtu.be/lukpSpzfgSQ
6/14/2019 10:40 am 2pm Within an hour of sending out a massive 6/12 email (today's email 6/14/2019 of the thread is now first) of Belfast and Waldo County lawless enforcement fabricating charges and false arrests against me from 9/2017-2/23/2018, Waldo Sheriff's dept. Detective Greeley and ? come to my house stating my ankle trackher is showing a breech. A lie. They were hoping to say I was not stable and to take me into psychiatric hospitalization. But I was filming. Phew. They can't stop my truth so they want to paint me crazy. Mom moved into the Cuckoo's Nest. Shackle that bird. 458 days as of 6/12/19 .  www.,boycottbelfast.blogspot.com for facts. Sick JustUs.

6/19/2019 I also called Tom's office and told his admin. assistant NOT to file this motion and sent a text as well.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 7:21 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Withdraw all motions immediatelyFw: Motion to Dismiss


Tom-
  1. Withdraw your problematic motion for my charge of terrorizing with a dangerous weapon that you filed today against my instructions as per 2 emails earlier today, phone calls to your office and texts. You wrote "and identifies Belfast City officials with the target holes." Absolutely not. That's just one problem of several. I'll write the motion.
  2. Withdraw your 6/7/2019 Motion to Amend Conditions of Release
  3. Respond to the email I sent today at 3:20 today, again requesting response to ADA Entwisle's confusing discoveries on the 2 harassment charges. This information is needed to write the motions to dismiss harassment.
There is not a court date scheduled as I called and checked at 4pm today. You must withdraw these motions immediately- you can do so via email or call the courts and do first thing tomorrow morning, Thursday, 6/20/2019. Please email me by 9 am to confirm all motions you have filed for my cases are withdrawn. If I don't receive this by 9am I must re-request every hour after until received. This is my life at stake. I hope you understand as my attorney.

Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 5:37 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Re: Motion to Dismiss

Tom- WITHDRAW THIS MOTION IMMEDIATELY. This is motion is not acceptable. I will write up the motions and then you may file them.



From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 3:20 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion to Dismiss

Laurie - 

I received your message not to file the motion but as I mentioned in my last email I was on my in to court to file one.

I attach what I filed.

Tom
From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 1:57 PM
To: LAURIE ALLEN
Subject: Motion to Dismiss

Laurie -

I have prepared and am about to file  a motion to Dismiss of the Criminal Threatening Charge.  I will email you a copy when I get back..  I spoke to Ryan Otis today.  He said he had no memory of you having or not having the copies of the Cease Harassment Notices in your belongings at the jail.

Tom

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 2:47 PM
To: Thomas Shehan; William Entwisle; 'James Greeley'; Jeffrey Trafton; chief@belfastmepd.org; Governor; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; mstewart@ap.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; attorney.general@maine.gov; Democracy Now!; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; VillageSoup; kathleenkearns@gmail.com; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; LAURIE ALLEN
Cc: garryconklin@roadrunner.com; jb@frontstreetshipyard.com; tmailloux@wcgh.org; belfastmaine@gmail.com; bre@ourtownbelfast.org; cgood1@roadrunner.com; info@coastalmountains.org; info@maillouxmarden.com; info@belfastlibrary.org; erirish@belfastlibrary.org; snorman@belfastlibrary.org; info@realtyofmaine.com; email@hartdalemaps.com; info@pica.is; support@gameloft.com; julieww@adelphia.net; michael.cunning2@gmail.com; minister@uubelfast.org; office@firstchurchinbelfast.org; info@waterfallarts.org; kimberly@belfastcreativecoalition.org; info@mainefarmlandtrust.org; bbwc2016@gmail.com; info@rjpmidcoast.org; info@waldocountyhabitat.org; info@fiddleheadartisansupply.c; f.lehmanea@gmail.com; neal@nealparent.com; madeline@mtaaccounting.com; abowen@allenif.com; jrossignol@allenif.com; ldavis@allenif.com; contact@meanwhile-in-belfast.com; info@mcleodfurniturestore.com; fitme@citydrawers.com; info@loyalbiscuit.com; deb@outonawhimsy.com; info@frontstreetpub.com; david@3tides.com; info@belmontboatworks.com; thomasfowlerpe@gmail.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; belfastbikes@earthlink.net; crabapplecole@icloud.com; crabiel71@gmail.com; charlie.grey@rsu71.org; gooddeeds@wemapit.com; g.stearns@belfastmepd.org; jkirlin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: When and what is 2nd harassment charge/evidenceRe: Motion to Continue

Court Appointed Attorney Tom Shehan,

Do not file ANY motions until I have reviewed them per my instructions I emailed to you on Friday , 6/14/2019 below. These are the instructions to do motions to dismiss 2 harassment charges and 1 terrorizing with a dangerous weapon to be heard all together at the upcoming dispositional conference that was continued per my request. Please advise of the date for this dispositional conference.. Please advise when I will receive these motions for approval. AGAIN- DO NOT FILE ANY MOTIONS WITHOUT MY APPROVAL.


  1. Dismiss 2 harassment charges for failure to provide Laurie Allen with the original signed cease harassment notices as mandated on the notice and witnessed by bailiff Ryan Otis in the Waldo Jail when I was falsely arrested on 11/1/2017 for unknown reason to date per ADA Enstwisle's non-discovery for arrest and 2nd harassment charge. Failure to produce video evidence for the first illegal cease harassment notice where I was issued a summons for a fabricated violation.
  2. Dismiss Terrorizing With A Dangerous Weapon for a legal, freedom of speech, freedom of expression target shoot protected by the First Amendment of The United States Constitution. Copied from this email thread  " I posted my one and only 10/2017 innocent target shoot to my youtube channel in 1/2018. I do not own a gun and I never have. I did not have any record or arrests prior to Belfast Chief McFadden's fabricated charges and arrests beginning in 9/2017.  I did not post this target shoot anywhere or send it to anyone. It was just for me on my playlist John & Me. Belfast Police Chief Mike Mcfadden stalks my youtube, found it and sent it out globally. He incites terror not me. I was illegally arrested on 2/23/18, 7 days in jail where I was not to live. I did. Dismiss, this is freedom of speech and legal under the First Amendment. 
    Belfast Chief McFadden sent out my private, innocent, youtube target shoot video 
    that is absolutely freedom of expression on the internet. I did not send it to anyone 
    or post it anywhere, including my blog.Dismiss. This Harvard Law and Malice definition proves that there is not a case. 
Truly Innocent,
Laurie Allen


6/17/2019 This email sent to MPBN included the 6/14/19 email and all proof of my innocence.

From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 11:14 AM
To: mvogelzang@mainepublic.org; cbeck@mainepublic.org; LAURIE ALLEN
Cc: William Entwisle; chief@belfastmepd.org; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; mstewart@ap.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; attorney.general@maine.gov; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; kathleenkearns@gmail.com; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; Thomas Shehan; Governor; 'James Greeley'; Jeffrey Trafton; Democracy Now!; VillageSoup; garryconklin@roadrunner.com; jb@frontstreetshipyard.com; tmailloux@wcgh.org; belfastmaine@gmail.com; bre@ourtownbelfast.org; cgood1@roadrunner.com; info@coastalmountains.org; info@maillouxmarden.com; info@belfastlibrary.org; erirish@belfastlibrary.org; snorman@belfastlibrary.org; info@realtyofmaine.com; info@pica.is; support@gameloft.com; julieww@adelphia.net; michael.cunning2@gmail.com; minister@uubelfast.org; marchas@sitestar.net; office@firstchurchinbelfast.org; info@waterfallarts.org; kimberly@belfastcreativecoalition.org; info@mainefarmlandtrust.org; bbwc2016@gmail.com; info@rjpmidcoast.org; info@waldocountyhabitat.org; f.lehmanea@gmail.com; neal@nealparent.com; madeline@mtaaccounting.com; abowen@allenif.com; jrossignol@allenif.com; ldavis@allenif.com; contact@meanwhile-in-belfast.com; fitme@citydrawers.com; info@loyalbiscuit.com; info@frontstreetpub.com; david@3tides.com; thomasfowlerpe@gmail.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; belfastbikes@earthlink.net; crabapplecole@icloud.com; crabiel71@gmail.com; charlie.grey@rsu71.org; gooddeeds@wemapit.com; g.stearns@belfastmepd.org; jkirlin@gmail.com; jb@frontstreetshipyard.com; channan@mainepublic.org; gmaxwell@mainepublic.org; rholt@mainepublic.org; cmorrissey@mainepublic.org; kshortall@mainepublic.org; jmandrake@mainepublic.org
Subject: MPBN FYI Fw: When and what is 2nd harassment charge/evidenceRe: Motion to Continue

Dear Mark Vogelzang (President & CEO) and Charles Beck (VP., Dir. of Radio & Television), 

Charles Beck is my neighbor of 9 years and witness to the corruption of Belfast City Hall and Belfast Police Department, Chief McFadden to Seaview Terrace, my home, property and life for 8 of those 9 years.  I wish that MPBN would have interviewed me a long time ago. This is personal to me and business for MPBN. There is a reason that my neighbor is VP of MPBN.

My life has been at stake with fabricated charges, arrests, jailing's and constant targeting to silence my First Amendment rights proving the corruption. As police brutality is in the news daily, Charles can attest that I have basically placed myself under house arrest since being shackled with an ankle tracker 463 days ago after a terrifying false arrest on 2/23/2018 and jailing into Two Bridges Correctional Facility. It is proven that Waldo Jail would not take the bail payment, reduced to 5k from 25k on 2/28/18, 3/1/2018 and 3/2/2018 until the guards at TBCF saw me give a note and instructions to an outgoing cellmate @ 9am that Friday, 3/2/18. Prior to that, the guard confidently told me that my bail was not paid and snickered. I knew my friend was there trying to pay it for the 3rd day before having to go to work @ 9am.  Furthermore, the outrageous 25k bail was meant to get me to TBCF . The reduction to 5k was to save face, knowing they had financially broke me. They didn't think I had the 5k and would be silenced that weekend. They didn't advise me that my daughter had put 50 dollars in the jail bank to allow me to make phone calls to get free. They would not let me get to the outside. That I am still alive and semi-free is nothing short of a miracle. I am thankful.

After my cellmate was released @ 9am, the loudspeaker announcement was "Allen prepare for transport to Belfast". What would have happened to me that weekend in TBCF is clear. Prior to Belfast, my record has been spotless and my history of honesty and desire to help and fix what I can is well known in neighboring Bayside, Town of Northport since 1970. 

Maine media will not interview me after sending me out in the Maine media and AP globally as a terrorist Mom. Chief McFadden incited the terror, stalked my youtube and used my innocent target shoot from 10/2017. That video where I do not own a gun, have never shot a gun and I only mouthed off some steam of Belfast City Hall officials who have been enabling the destruction to my life and property regardless 8 of years of my pleas for accountability to them. That video is absolutely First Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech and Expression and I never sent that video to anyone or posted it anywhere. I thought it was private on my playlist of John and Me. McFadden shamed an innocent, below poverty, honest 58 year old small woman to the world. His fabricated harassment charges against me began in 9/2017 with the Cameron family and Mark Rae next door. Outright taking 15 ft of my property without any legality. With police protection. Since May 2017 to present day. McFadden refused to protect me from them but Deputy Chief Judge Susan Sparaco did. I went to court to get a protection order against Mark Rae and won in 5/2018. He tried to get that appealed but the Maine Supreme Court upheld my protection. 
I have not been allowed to be heard pro se, for complete dismissal of all charges since my first corrupted court hearing with Judge Mathews on 12/8/2017. It is now 6/17/2019, my life is in the hands of a court appointed attorney paid for by the State because of the refusal of the court to allow pro se, Freedom of Speech to tell the truth. At the many dispositional hearings where I represented myself against these fabricated charges that is an easy win, each Judge- Mathews, Fowle and predominantly Robert Murray persisted that I needed to take a court appointed attorney. I was getting denied my rights to be heard and pressured into taking a court appointed attorney. Tom Shehan is my 3rd court appointed as the previous David Sinclair and Lisa Whittier were clearly for the State.  Tom can get all charges dismissed in the next dispositional conference because the State has no evidence, paperwork was corrupted and the video is clear Freedom of Speech. Easy.

There is no reason to waste even more tax payer dollars to silence me and my freedom of speech. Charles knows I talk, talk, talk. Not to anyone, just talking in my yard in case anyone wants to hear the terrifying truth of Belfast government and community corruption. The cost over these 8 years is astronomical to silence one Mom that stands up to wrong until. Alone. My civic duty and honor. Law enforcement comes into my home whenever they want and they do. I comply and have nothing to hide and plenty to say.

An innocent Mom shackled in the face of MPBN for 463 days, charging this below poverty (18k a year) single 58 year old woman $150 a month for this cancer cell where my Dad, sister and 2 brothers have died from cancer. 

This is news for "The Mission of Maine Public" . Please tell my truth that will free and protect me.  Thank you.

Laurie Allen
17 Seaview Terror
Belfast, Maine 04915


The Mission of Maine Public

Every day, Maine Public connects the people of Maine to each other and to the world through the open exchange of information, ideas and cultural content. As Maine’s premier, independent media resource, we create exceptional opportunities for the communities we serve to engage with critical issues, compelling stories and quality entertainment.
Vision
Maine Public will inform, inspire and delight.
We will be recognized throughout Maine and beyond as an organization that has made a distinct difference by focusing in a disciplined manner on the issues most important to Maine and by being relentless in pursuit of the truth about them. We will also be noted for the consistent quality of the cultural and entertainment programming that we provide through collaborations with other organizations and independent producers.
We will continue to be regarded as a superb financial steward by all of our supporters, investing resources wisely across our multiple services: Web, radio, TV and print. We will creatively build on the value created by PBS, NPR, and other organizations to deliver rich, rewarding content.
Maine Public will be known throughout Maine as an organization that listens and acts accordingly.
Our enterprise will help lead Maine towards its bright future.
Values
At Maine Public we value:
Civic Engagement — We view our responsibility to promote awareness and participation in the democratic process as supremely important. We actively seek to make workings of government and the public conversation as accessible as possible.
Creativity — We recognize the critical role that creativity plays in our organization’s life, as well as the broader world. We support and nurture the kind of risk-taking and innovation that are hallmarks of a creative environment.
Ethical Standards — We maintain an unwavering commitment to fairness, transparency, tolerance, diversity, and accountability in everything we do.
Life Long Learning — We believe in the power of knowledge to transform lives and promote greater understanding. We endeavor to maximize the opportunities available to the public to participate in a culture of learning throughout their lives.
Public Service — We take our role as stewards of the public trust very seriously. We strive to build value in the communities we serve through initiatives and programming that have the public interest at heart.
Brand
Maine Public is our State's leading source of trusted insight and content about Maine and the world.
Organizational Overview
Public radio and television broadcasting in the United States is organized as a cooperative of community-based stations which pool resources to create shared national programming and individually serve the needs of their communities. Maine Public serves Maine and also reaches most of New Brunswick, Canada, and parts of New Hampshire and Massachusetts.
Through its radio, television, educational and Web services, Maine Public provides ideas, information and lifelong learning to a diverse public. The majority of these services are available to everyone at no charge. Hundreds of thousands of people find value in Maine Public’s services every day. Private donations — including those received from radio members, television members, program sponsors and contributors of unrestricted gifts — comprise the largest source of revenue for the organization. The membership base alone totals over 60,000 individuals and families who form the largest nonprofit membership group in the state. In addition, thousands of volunteers donate their time and talents to the organization every year.
Formation of Maine Public
Maine Public was formed in 1992 through the merger of the educational radio and television stations provided by the University of Maine System and WCBB public television operated by Colby, Bates and Bowdoin Colleges. Maine Public is an independently owned and operated 501(c)3 nonprofit organization with office and studio locations in Bangor, Lewiston and Portland, Maine.
Executive Management
Mark Vogelzang
President & CEO
mvogelzang@mainepublic.org
Charles Beck
V.P., Dir. of Radio & Television
cbeck@mainepublic.org
Clare E. Hannan
V.P. of Administration & CFO
channan@mainepublic.org
Gil Maxwell
V.P. Technology
Chief Technology Officer
gmaxwell@mainepublic.org
Rob Holt
Digital Director
rholt@mainepublic.org
Cory Morrissey
Director of Marketing, Public Relations, Underwriting & Audience Services
cmorrissey@mainepublic.org
Mark Simpson
News & Public Affairs Director
kshortall@mainepublic.org
Jaclyn Mandrake
Director of Human Resources
jmandrake@mainepublic.org


From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 10:41 AM
From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 10:41 AM
To: Thomas Shehan; William Entwisle; 'James Greeley'; Jeffrey Trafton; chief@belfastmepd.org; Governor; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; mstewart@ap.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; attorney.general@maine.gov; Democracy Now!; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; VillageSoup; kathleenkearns@gmail.com; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com; LAURIE ALLEN
Cc: garryconklin@roadrunner.com; jb@frontstreetshipyard.com; tmailloux@wcgh.org; belfastmaine@gmail.com; bre@ourtownbelfast.org; cgood1@roadrunner.com; info@coastalmountains.org; info@maillouxmarden.com; info@belfastlibrary.org; erirish@belfastlibrary.org; snorman@belfastlibrary.org; info@realtyofmaine.com; email@hartdalemaps.com; info@pica.is; support@gameloft.com; julieww@adelphia.net; michael.cunning2@gmail.com; minister@uubelfast.org; marchas@sitestar.net; office@firstchurchinbelfast.org; info@waterfallarts.org; kimberly@belfastcreativecoalition.org; info@mainefarmlandtrust.org; bbwc2016@gmail.com; info@rjpmidcoast.org; info@waldocountyhabitat.org; info@fiddleheadartisansupply.c; f.lehmanea@gmail.com; neal@nealparent.com; madeline@mtaaccounting.com; abowen@allenif.com; jrossignol@allenif.com; ldavis@allenif.com; contact@meanwhile-in-belfast.com; info@mcleodfurniturestore.com; fitme@citydrawers.com; info@loyalbiscuit.com; deb@outonawhimsy.com; info@frontstreetpub.com; david@3tides.com; info@belmontboatworks.com; thomasfowlerpe@gmail.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; belfastbikes@earthlink.net; crabapplecole@icloud.com; crabiel71@gmail.com; charlie.grey@rsu71.org; gooddeeds@wemapit.com; g.stearns@belfastmepd.org; jkirlin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: When and what is 2nd harassment charge/evidenceRe: Motion to Continue

Tom,

Thank you. Your email response below proves that I am innocent. Chief McFadden has fabricated ALL charges of 2 harassment and one terrorizing with a dangerous weapon issuing false summons, arrests and jail. Please draft motions to dismiss all charges with legal language and possibly more legal references that I am ignorant to with a simple High School diploma and 34 credits from night school. Please email the drafts of the motions for my approval to submit to Brooke Otis, Waldo Judiciary Center. Please advise when I will receive these drafts.

  1. Dismiss 2 harassment charges for failure to provide Laurie Allen with the original signed cease harassment notices as mandated on the notice and witnessed by bailiff Ryan Otis in the Waldo Jail when I was falsely arrested on 11/1/2017 for unknown reason to date per ADA Enstwisle's non-discovery for arrest and 2nd harassment charge. Failure to produce video evidence for the first illegal cease harassment notice where I was issued a summons for a fabricated violation.
  2. Dismiss Terrorizing With A Dangerous Weapon for a legal, freedom of speech, freedom of expression target shoot protected by the First Amendment of The United States Constitution. Copied from this email thread  " I posted my one and only 10/2017 innocent target shoot to my youtube channel in 1/2018. I do not own a gun and I never have. I did not have any record or arrests prior to Belfast Chief McFadden's fabricated charges and arrests beginning in 9/2017.  I did not post this target shoot anywhere or send it to anyone. It was just for me on my playlist John & Me. Belfast Police Chief Mike Mcfadden stalks my youtube, found it and sent it out globally. He incites terror not me. I was illegally arrested on 2/23/18, 7 days in jail where I was not to live. I did. Dismiss, this is freedom of speech and legal under the First Amendment. 
    Belfast Chief McFadden sent out my private, innocent, youtube target shoot video 
    that is absolutely freedom of expression on the internet. I did not send it to anyone 
    or post it anywhere, including my blog.Dismiss. This Harvard Law and Malice definition proves that there is not a case. 

    Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression
     on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more 
    obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 
    The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several 
    observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance." 
     However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate
     the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment 
    fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. 
    The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.
    Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is
    simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of 
    the press . . .."  But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built 
    upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines 
    would go as follows:

    If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."
    If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a
    compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."
    A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.
    Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is
    permitted are constitutional if and only if:
    they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;
    they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and
    they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."
    On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government
    may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose
    of the property in question.
    Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless
    they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:
      1.  Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited. 
      2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be
       prohibited. 
      3.  Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, 
      that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited. 
      4.  Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or 
      not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, 
      and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children. 
      5.  Defamatory statements may be prohibited.  (In other words, the making of such statements
       may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.)  However, if the target of the defamation is a 
      "public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice." 
       If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
       the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity. 
      6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or 
      directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is 
      reasonably necessary.

      What is MALICE?

      In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, 
      but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser,
       4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it)
       which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a 
      definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart 
      regardless of social duty aud fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts 
      committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common
       acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act 
      done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do 
      an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the 
      same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act in- cludes the willful doing of it. 
      Malice includes intent and will. State v. Bobbins. 06 Me. 328. For other definitions see 
      Shannon v. Jones, 70 Tex. 141. 13 S. W. 477; Williams v. Williams. 20 Colo. 51. 37 Pac. 
      014; Smith v. Railroad Co., 87 Md. 48. 3S Atl. 1072; In re Freche (D. C.) 109 Fed. 621 ; 
      Craft v. State, 3 Kan. 486; Lewis v. Chapman. 10 N. Y. 309; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475.
       21 S. W. 193; State v. Witt. 34 Kan. 488. 8 Pac. 709; State v. Walker, 9 Houst. tDel.) 
      404, 33 Atl. 227; Cotton v. State. 32 Tex. 014; Com. v. Chance, 174 Mass. 245. 54 N. E. 551.
      75 Am. St. Rep. 306. In the law of libel and slander. An evil intent or motive arising from spite
       or ill will; personal hatred or ill will; culpable recklessness or a willful and wanton disregard 
      of the rights and interests of the per- ) MALICE son defamed. McDonald v. Brown, 
      23 R. I. 546, 51 Atl. 213, 58 L. R. A. 768, 91 Am. St. Rep. 659; Hearne v. De Young, 
      132 Cal. 357, 64 Pac. 576; Cherry v. Des Moines Leader, 114 Iowa, 298, 86 N. W. 323, 
      54 L R. A. 855, 89 Am. St. Rep. 365; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 73 S. W. 668

      TLD Example: The defense attorney successfully proved to the jury that his client acted
       without malice when he broke into the vacant cabin to escape the snow and freezing temperatures.

      First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever. @ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot. I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will. @1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. 

      John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said. @2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright. @3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. 

      I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye. 
        

      @3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "

      John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.) I did it. I did it. 9 9 9. I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some."

      @6:11 I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marhsall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me.John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.) 

      Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl? He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear with these little peanuts. Alright bye."
    From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:13 PM
    To: LAURIE ALLEN
    Subject: Basis for Harassment Charges

    Laurie -

    I email you at your request to answer two questions.  I am not going to send  it to anyone other than you as I feel I must protect the confidentiality of the attorney client privilege.  If you release it to anyone that is your business.  I have nothing to say about that.

              The state has brought two charges of Harassment (class E).  The first charge is under Docket No. WACD-CR-2017-839.  The complaint in this docket number lists an offense date of November 1, 2017.  The complaint reads: "On or about November 1, 2017, in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen, without reasonable cause, did engage in course of conduct with the intent to harass, torment, or threaten Mark A. Rae, after having been forbidden to do so by a sheriff, sheriff deputy, constable or police officer or justice of the peace or by a protective order issued under Title 5, §4654 or 4655 or Title 19-A § 4006 or 4007." 
              In the narrative portion of the Discovery, Officer Travis Spencer of the Belfast Police Department wrote "When I came in to start my shift at 18:00, Sgt. Cook received a text  from Sgt. Gibbs that was [sic] a video from Mark Rae; [sic] This video contained footage of who I knew as Laurie Allen via her voice harassing either Mark or one of Mark's employee's about the property lines.  The property was surveyed and Mark placed a stake on his side of the property where Laurie pulled the stake out and threw it him nearly hitting him.  See attached video."
                   I spoke with ADA Entwisle who stated that the video was not able to be copied.  He feels it no longer exists.

                    The second Harassment charge was brought under Docket No. WALCD-CR-2017-862.  The alleged date of this offense is October 17,2017.  The name of the victim is Mark A. Rae.  The complaint charges as follows: 

        "On or about October 17, 2017 in Belfast, Waldo County, Maine, Laurie L. Allen,without reasonable cause did engage in a course of conduct with the intent to harass, torment or threaten Mark A. Rae, after having forbidden to do so by a sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable or police officer or a justice of the peace or by a court in a protective order issued under Title 5, Sec. 4654 or 4655 or Title 19-A Sec 4006 or 4007.

            There is no narrative in the Discovery that I have received about this incident.

            In answer to the question why you were arrested on November 1, 2017, I have no answer.  Courts generally give police officers discretion to arrest individuals if the officer believes that  he or she has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and the person they are arresting committed it.

      There is no narrative in the Discovery that I have so far received relating to this incident.  I have asked ADA Entwisle for the law enforcement officer's narrative.

    Tom
    _________________________________________________________________________________

    Truly Innocent,
    Laurie Allen
    17 Seaview Terrace
    Belfast, Maine 04915

    6/14/2019 10:40 am


    From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 12:35 PM
    To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN; William Entwisle; 'James Greeley'; Jeffrey Trafton; chief@belfastmepd.org; Governor; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; mstewart@ap.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org; attorney.general@maine.gov; Democracy Now!; acurtis@bangordailynews.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; news@pressherald.com; wabi@wabi.tv; VillageSoup; kathleenkearns@gmail.com; ned.lightner@gmail.com; georgeallen99; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; scheduling@collins.state.gov; einstein@toast.net; district1@waldocountyme.gov; Editor@FalmouthToday.ME; editor@thebollard.com; rvezza@starledger.com
    Cc: garryconklin@roadrunner.com; jb@frontstreetshipyard.com; tmailloux@wcgh.org; belfastmaine@gmail.com; bre@ourtownbelfast.org; cgood1@roadrunner.com; info@coastalmountains.org; info@maillouxmarden.com; info@belfastlibrary.org; erirish@belfastlibrary.org; snorman@belfastlibrary.org; info@realtyofmaine.com; email@hartdalemaps.com; info@pica.is; support@gameloft.com; julieww@adelphia.net; michael.cunning2@gmail.com; minister@uubelfast.org; marchas@sitestar.net; office@firstchurchinbelfast.org; info@waterfallarts.org; kimberly@belfastcreativecoalition.org; info@mainefarmlandtrust.org; bbwc2016@gmail.com; info@rjpmidcoast.org; info@waldocountyhabitat.org; info@fiddleheadartisansupply.c; f.lehmanea@gmail.com; neal@nealparent.com; madeline@mtaaccounting.com; abowen@allenif.com; jrossignol@allenif.com; ldavis@allenif.com; contact@meanwhile-in-belfast.com; info@mcleodfurniturestore.com; fitme@citydrawers.com; info@loyalbiscuit.com; deb@outonawhimsy.com; info@frontstreetpub.com; david@3tides.com; info@belmontboatworks.com; thomasfowlerpe@gmail.com; senatorthibodeau@aol.com; belfastbikes@earthlink.net; crabapplecole@icloud.com; crabiel71@gmail.com; charlie.grey@rsu71.org; gooddeeds@wemapit.com; g.stearns@belfastmepd.org; jkirlin@gmail.com
    Subject: Re: When and what is 2nd harassment charge/evidenceRe: Motion to Continue

     (Star Ledger- I was born Exit 9, South River, graduate SRHS 1978 Moved to Belfast Me. in 2010. Undisclosed hell and slaughter since. I've taken all of the corruption and terrorizing up to the State level on my 134K small property. 17 Seaview Terrace, 04915. Please interview me. Out of State Media will prove my innocence and  truth. In state media is for the State against Mom Please. 207-XXX-XXXX)

    Tom (my court appointed attorney),

    PLEASE ANSWER BOTH REQUESTS TODAY AND SEND TO ALL I HAVE SENT THIS TO. I HAVE BEEN REQUESTING #1 SINCE 5/29/19 AS MY NEW ATTORNEY AND WOULD HAVE WENT INTO COURT YESTERDAY WITHOUT MY CHARGE AND ARREST REASONS. THIS IS FRIGHTENING AND ENOUGH. SINCE 2017 I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO HEAR MY CHARGES AS PRO SE WITH ESCALATING ATTEMPTS FOR SILENCING TRUTH AND PROOF.


    1. PLEASE EMAIL ME WHAT IS THE 2017 2ND FALSE HARASSMENT CHARGE WITH VIOLATION DATE, POLICE REPORT/EXPLANATION AND EVIDENCE FOR THIS CHARGE.
    2. PLEASE EMAIL ME WHY I WAS ARRESTED AT MY HOME, HANDCUFFED AND TAKEN TO WALDO JAIL ON 11/1/2017 WITH VIOLATION DATE, POLICE REPORT/EXPLANATION AND EVIDENCE FOR THIS ARREST.


    THANK YOU,
    LAURIE ALLEN

    PS- FOR PROTECTION FROM ANOTHER FALSE ARREST. RICK OTTO SAID MY TRACKER, NOW SHACKLED 458 DAYS, PAYMENT OF $150 WAS RECEIVED. YET AS OF THIS MOMENT, 6/12/2019, 12:20pm  THE CHECK HAS NOT BEEN CASHED. TODAY IS THE DUE DATE AND I ALWAYS SEND IT OUT BEFORE THE MONTH BEGINS TO MAKE SURE IT GETS THERE A WEEK BEFORE THE 12TH. VIOLATION OF BAIL CONDITIONS IS JAIL AND SILENCED. RIGHT? MY WORD AGAINST JUSTUS.

    From: rick otto <rick.otto@mainepretrial.org>
    Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:47 PM
    To: 'LAURIE ALLEN'
    Subject: RE: $150 ankle fee mailed 5/28/2019

    Laurie;
    It was received. I was informed that a receipt was mailed today. Take care. Rick

    From: LAURIE ALLEN [mailto:laurieallen55@msn.com] 
    Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:10 PM
    To: rick.otto@mainepretrial.org ; LAURIE ALLEN
    Subject: $150 ankle fee mailed 5/28/2019

    Rick,

    My epay check from Camden National mailed to County of Waldo should have been received last week but it has not been cashed yet. Please advise as it is due by the 12th.  Mailed to the same address 10 Public Safety Way made out to County of Waldo.

    Laurie

    County Waldo Ankle Trackher

    Last Paid: $150.00 on 5/28/2019


    From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:28 AM
    To: LAURIE ALLEN
    Subject: Re: When and what is 2nd harassment charge/evidenceRe: Motion to Continue

    I do not know as of yet when the court continued the case to. 

    On Monday, June 10, 2019, 6:09:42 PM EDT, LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com> wrote:


    Tom,

    1. When is the dispositional conference to present the dismissal motions for 2 harassment charges and terrorizing with a dangerous weapon using my information for the motions in the emails I sent to you today? 
    2.  When will you inform me what the 2nd harassment charge is and what the evidence is?

    As Rick Otto has stated, if the parties agree the Judge can mediate and can dismiss. See Rick's extensive history to be working in rural Maine jail for a non profit. Right?       https://boycottbelfast.blogspot.com/p/rick-otto.html I got it from https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-otto-748b7a6a/#skip-link

    This is what a dispositional conference is per Rick Otto. 
    From: rick otto <rick.otto@mainepretrial.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:58 PM
    To: 'LAURIE ALLEN'
    Subject: RE: Court Date on 4/23/19

    Laurie;
    It is an opportunity to try to resolve the case. Sometimes with permission of the parties the judge can participate to mediate. Hopefully, it will get dismissed or at least an offer that will help end the case. Take care. Rick

         
    Thank You,
    Laurie


    From: Thomas Shehan <shehanlawoffice@yahoo.com>
    Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 4:06 PM
    To: LAURIE ALLEN
    Subject: Motion to Continue

    Laurie -

    The Motion to Continue has been granted.  You do not have to go to court tomorrow.

    Tom

    From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
    Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 2:19 PM
    To: district1@waldocountyme.gov; laurieallen55@msn.com
    Subject: Fw: ankle email and Greely Fw: Test

    Ms. Johnson, Waldo County Commissioner of Belfast,

    This is Laurie Allen, falsely charged 3 times, with false arrests, hate crimes and terrorism from Belfast law enforcement for not allowing my property to be stolen by Maine corrupt government. Years ago, I received 2 anonymous, sexually threatening, terrorizing letters. Sheriff Trafton and Chief McFadden began blocking my emails for protection and investigation at that time.

    I have been shackled with a cancer cell ankle tracker since 3/2/2018 where I was not supposed to get out of Two Bridges but they bailed when I got a letter to the outside with an exiting jail lady. Judge Sparaco has awarded several of my cases and recently a protection order against Mark Rae who has been terrorizing me with hate crimes, theft, threats, assault after assault to my property and vehicles, endless crimes, daily, since last May. Documented into a 1 1/2 hr move Overview Greed of just some of the horror. Including today. Violating the protection order.  Belfast law enforcement protects the raging, huge Mark Rae and all the heavy equipment and his workers joining in on mob mentality to hurt me for not allowing them to take my property.

    In Superior Court on 6/6/18, at 11am, my son and I walked into an empty building. Not one person, all doors closed, no security, no scans or checks. Up the stairs and into a staged courtroom with only Judge Murray, ADA Entwisle and Marshall Dudley. The same 3 since December 2018 where I've yet to be heard for immediate dismissal of all charges for false ALL. Proven. Documented. To walk in with my son this time and not alone as always. Murray ran, he didn't even hear my motions to dismiss again. Ordered the bail conditions remain and the title 15 denied since I just won a protection order Pro se. Against Mark Rae who got a false arrest on me with a false unavailable video. Right.

    Now Greely won't let me go to the Court house or Police Station and will not put it in writing. Rick Otto said he would email me Greeley's decision but is resisting the email that he said he would send. His email is blocking me, his are reaching me. Greeley just left me a message to call him. I will not talk to him anymore. He was yelling and yelling at me, his officer yesterday threatened to arrest me when he came to my house, the NEW monitor- 2 have broke, sending out breaches again and again, more blue mean men at my door... I rarely go out because I want to live for my children. But they keep coming and inciting. The new monitor began vibrating and flash into my skin where my father, sister and 2 brothers have died from cancer but of no concern to enforcement, Courts and agencies. I called Rick Otto and left a message to stop the swat team from coming. Then I called 911 and told them because I wanted it documented in case I was taken again.

    Please call Greeley and tell him to email me any problems he has with me or have Rick Otto do it. Stop this please. I'm a mother and an honest person. 57 years old and this is not my doing. It's the government. Freedom of Speech in America not in he United States. I want to change that and keep on talking. Clearly knowing they want me to die for it. 2 times. My honor. 
    Truly,

    Laurie Allen
    207-XXX-XXXX

    From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
    Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:34 AM
    To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
    Subject: 3rd req Dismissal Motion Terrorizing With A Dangerous Weapon


    Belfast Chief McFadden sent out my private, innocent, youtube target shoot video 
    that is absolutely freedom of expression on the internet. I did not send it to anyone 
    or post it anywhere, including my blog.Dismiss. This Harvard Law and Malice definition proves that there is not a case. 

    Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression
     on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more 
    obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 
    The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several 
    observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance." 
     However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate
     the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment 
    fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. 
    The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.
    Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is
    simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of 
    the press . . .."  But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built 
    upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines 
    would go as follows:

    If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."
    If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a
    compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."
    A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.
    Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is
    permitted are constitutional if and only if:
    they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;
    they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and
    they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."
    On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government
    may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose
    of the property in question.
    Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless
    they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:
      1.  Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited. 
      2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be
       prohibited. 
      3.  Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, 
      that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited. 
      4.  Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or 
      not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, 
      and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children. 
      5.  Defamatory statements may be prohibited.  (In other words, the making of such statements
       may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.)  However, if the target of the defamation is a 
      "public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice." 
       If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
       the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity. 
      6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or 
      directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is 
      reasonably necessary.

      What is MALICE?

      In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser, 4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart regardless of social duty aud fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act in- cludes the willful doing of it. Malice includes intent and will. State v. Bobbins. 06 Me. 328. For other definitions see Shannon v. Jones, 70 Tex. 141. 13 S. W. 477; Williams v. Williams. 20 Colo. 51. 37 Pac. 014; Smith v. Railroad Co., 87 Md. 48. 3S Atl. 1072; In re Freche (D. C.) 109 Fed. 621 ; Craft v. State, 3 Kan. 486; Lewis v. Chapman. 10 N. Y. 309; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475. 21 S. W. 193; State v. Witt. 34 Kan. 488. 8 Pac. 709; State v. Walker, 9 Houst. tDel.) 404, 33 Atl. 227; Cotton v. State. 32 Tex. 014; Com. v. Chance, 174 Mass. 245. 54 N. E. 551.75 Am. St. Rep. 306. In the law of libel and slander. An evil intent or motive arising from spite or ill will; personal hatred or ill will; culpable recklessness or a willful and wanton disregard of the rights and interests of the per- ) MALICE son defamed. McDonald v. Brown, 23 R. I. 546, 51 Atl. 213, 58 L. R. A. 768, 91 Am. St. Rep. 659; Hearne v. De Young, 132 Cal. 357, 64 Pac. 576; Cherry v. Des Moines Leader, 114 Iowa, 298, 86 N. W. 323, 54 L R. A. 855, 89 Am. St. Rep. 365; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 73 S. W. 668
      TLD Example: The defense attorney successfully proved to the jury that his client acted
       without malice when he broke into the vacant cabin to escape the snow and freezing temperatures.
      I posted my one and only 10/2017 innocent target shoot to my youtube channel in 1/2018. I do not own a gun and I never have. I did not have any record or arrests prior to Belfast Chief McFadden's fabricated charges and arrests beginning in 9/2017.  I did not post this target shoot anywhere or send it to anyone. It was just for me on my playlist John & Me. Belfast Police Chief Mike Mcfadden stalks my youtube, found it and sent it out globally. He incites terror not me. I was illegally arrested on 2/23/18, 7 days in jail where I was not to live. I did. Dismiss, this is freedom of speech and legal under the First Amendment. 



      First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever. @ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot. I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will. @1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. 

      John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said. @2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright. @3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. 

      I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye. 
        

      @3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "

      John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.) I did it. I did it. 9 9 9. I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some."

      @6:11 I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marhsall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me.John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.) 

      Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl? He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear with these little peanuts. Alright bye."

      From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
      Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 12:13 PM
      To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
      Subject: 3rd req Dismissal Motions Harassment

      1. I was never given any cease harassment notices with my original signature as mandated on the form. Bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed at the Waldo Jail on 11/1/2017 when he took my bail money and I told him that I did not receive the notices. He confirmed that they were not on my personal belongings list and told the officers. They responded that I would be getting copies. Otis left and the officers never gave copies either. I don't even know what this arrest was for and still don't as of 6/10/2019 nor do I know what the 2nd harassment charge is. I continue to ask for these original notices. I went to the Belfast Police Department in 11/2017 and Officer Guba told me I would not be getting any original signed notices. I told Judge Mathews at the 12/8/2017 hearing for the 1rst harassment charge and at every hearing since. 
      2. Belfast Police Chief McFadden and Officer Rolerson refused my repeated requests for a cease harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace, Rae/Cameron Trust, Mark Rae, family and workers from 5/2017-9/2017 with video proof and Officer Rolerson protecting them. 

        July 20
        17 Mark Rae threatens to throw my personal property off of my property. Mark lies stating he has had it surveyed and fails to produce it in Court where Judge Sparaco issued me a protection order against Mark Rae 5/2018. After first minute there is nothing, just waiting for police.

        July 2017  Officer Rolerson responds and agrees it's a civil matter, no jurisdiction for police, threatens me that it could be a criminal matter. Kayla LaCombe states a new survey line. They don't have a survey. Rolerson protects them.
        https://youtu.be/DEuvPBIR5Ws                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    2017  @ 3:08 Mark Rae threatens that if I don't move my boat by tomorrow morning, he is taking it. https://youtu.be/oOPXGgKgBrE                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                2017 Kayla Lacombe (grandaughter to BO Cameron) trespassing and throwing my personal property

        2017 Mark Rae mauls my boat, slices my boot lock, slices the air valve off my tire, straps a bungee cord to try and get boot lock off, leaves permanent tar boot prints on the deck of my boat. Officer Juba does nothing. I ask for a cease harassment again. @ 1:33 I see for the first time that Mark Rae destroyed my tire. I hadn't noticed it with all the other destruction he did. Lots of f cursing. Venting verbally. For 7 years while protesting and attending City Hall meetings, I did not curse. All these men and a few women coming after me made me lower myself. No more.
        First and ONLY Criminal Trespass Notice by Officer (Sargent ?) Gibbs to set up another arrest.

        6/26/18 where he states it means nothing until violated, ie I trespass onto my property that 23 Seaview Terrace, Cameron/Rae family keeps trying to take, illegally with government support.


        9/13/18 Officer Richards calls Sgt. Gibbs and is advised to arrest me for criminal trespass as I am parked in the City right of way on my property. I show Richards the survey and original plans with original boundaries of Seaview Terrace, 1966. No boundary changes or sub divides have been done on Seaview Terrace per City Planner, Wayne Marshall 2012. I move my SUV @ 6:35


        10/30/18 Mark Rae trespassing, destroying my property with front loader regardless of protection order from Judge Sparaco.
         
      3. From: Michael McFadden <chief@belfastmepd.org>
        Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:51 AM
        To: LAURIE ALLEN; ward3councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward4councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward5@cityofbelfast.org; ward2councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward1councilor@cityofbelfast.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org
        Cc: Gregory Stearns; Jeffrey Trafton; Governor; robert.a.williams@maine.gov
        Subject: RE: Cease Harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace

        Ms. Allen,

        Over the past couple months there have been several complaints generated by you and/or your neighbors regarding a boundary line dispute. The Belfast Police  Department has responded to every one of the calls for service made by you and/or your neighbors. As with most if not all boundary line disputes the actual situation cannot be resolved by the police due to the fact that we have no authority over boundary lines. This has been explained to both you and your neighbors. The officers have given sound advice as to how both parties need to proceed in order to come to a resolution on this issue.

        As far as your repeated requests to have your neighbors issued harassment notices along with the real estate agents who sold the property, I would explain that the Belfast Police Department does have the authority to issue harassment notices, however we do so if/when we're able to determine harassing conduct is present. I have reviewed the videos you've posted to your YouTube channel regarding the alleged harassing behavior and find no behavior on your neighbors part that would justify a harassment notice being served on them.

        I have not responded to your repeated emails until now due to the fact that you seem to ignore what I say and simply make another identical demand to have a harassment notice served on your neighbors.

        As I've said before, at this time the Belfast Police Department will not be issuing a harassment notice on anyone based on the information you provided. I will say that should you provide us with information that justifies a harassment notice be served we will most certainly follow through with that function.

        Thank you for your understanding.
        Chief McFadden.
      4. On 9/7/2017 Chief McFadden offered 23 Seaview Terrace a cease harassment against me without any proof and I was issued notice but not given the original notice that I asked for and continue to ask for.
      5. On 10/23/17 Officer Guba served me a summons for a violation of the 9/7/2017 cease harassment on 10/17/17 per a video taken by worker Kevin Page that is not available but is "clearly" my voice harassing Mark Rae. This did not happen. The court hearing was for 12/8/17. Here is video of Kevin Page harassing and scaring me and the protection order against Mark Rae granted to me by Judge Sparaco 5/2018 and upheld by the Maine Supreme Court.
      6. On 11/1/2017 the K9 unit and another Belfast PD Crusier came to my home in the evening and arrested me. This was the last arrest before 2/23/18 where I was falsely arrested and charged with terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.
      The end of this 6/12/2019 12:15pm email. Thank you.

      My 6/11/2019 dispositional conference was granted a continuance per my request since my court appointed attorney Tom Shehan did not do the dismissal of all charges-  fabricated harassment and one fabricated terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. I sent him emails today with the case closed information to use to write up the motions. They are below. I will not be silent. Freedom of Speech is worth dying for. Our civil duty.

      From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
      Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 6:09 PM
      To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
      Subject: When and what is 2nd harassment charge/evidenceRe: Motion to Continue

      Tom,
      1. When is the dispositional conference to present the dismissal motions for 2 harassment charges and terrorizing with a dangerous weapon using my information for the motions in the emails I sent to you today?
      As Rick Otto has stated, if the parties agree the Judge can mediate and can dismiss. See Rick's extensive history     https://boycottbelfast.blogspot.com/p/rick-otto.html I got it from https://www.linkedin.com/in/rick-otto-748b7a6a/#skip-link

      This is what a dispositional conference is per Rick Otto. 
      From: rick otto <rick.otto@mainepretrial.org>
      Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:58 PM
      To: 'LAURIE ALLEN'
      Subject: RE: Court Date on 4/23/19

      Laurie;
      It is an opportunity to try to resolve the case. Sometimes with permission of the parties the judge can participate to mediate. Hopefully, it will get dismissed or at least an offer that will help end the case. Take care. Rick

          2.  When will you inform me what the 2nd harassment charge is and what the evidence is?

      Thank You,
      Laurie


      From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
      Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:03 AM
      To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
      Subject: Re: And Tom email for 9/7/17 CH Fw: 453rd day shackling Mom 1rst Amnd Innocent


      Tom,

      You are not advising of the 2nd cease harassment charge and evidence. You are not filing motions as I requested. Please get a continuance for tomorrow's dispositional hearing because you have not filed the motions to dismiss 2 harassment charges and 1 terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.

      I will send another email with specifics again for the motions but I wanted to get this to you now so you can call ADA Entwisle and continue. If you did the dismissals and then the Judge mediated and denied the motions for dismissal THEN would come the motion for removing the ankle monitor and ALL zoning restrictions. I will keep the monitor on until the motions for dismissal are denied by the Judge.

      Laurie

      From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
      Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:34 AM
      To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
      Subject: 3rd req Dismissal Motion Terrorizing With A Dangerous Weapon


      Belfast Chief McFadden sent out my private, innocent, youtube target shoot video 
      that is absolutely freedom of expression on the internet. I did not send it to anyone 
      or post it anywhere, including my blog.Dismiss. This Harvard Law and Malice definition proves that there is not a case. 

      Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression
       on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more 
      obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 
      The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several 
      observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance." 
       However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate
       the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment 
      fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. 
      The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.
      Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is
      simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of 
      the press . . .."  But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built 
      upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines 
      would go as follows:

      If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."
      If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a
      compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."
      A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.
      Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is
      permitted are constitutional if and only if:
      they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;
      they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and
      they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."
      On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government
      may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose
      of the property in question.
      Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless
      they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:
        1.  Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited. 
        2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be
         prohibited. 
        3.  Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, 
        that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited. 
        4.  Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or 
        not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, 
        and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children. 
        5.  Defamatory statements may be prohibited.  (In other words, the making of such statements
         may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.)  However, if the target of the defamation is a 
        "public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice." 
         If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
         the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity. 
        6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or 
        directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is 
        reasonably necessary.

        What is MALICE?

        In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, 
        but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser,
         4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it)
         which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a 
        definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart 
        regardless of social duty aud fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts 
        committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common
         acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act 
        done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do 
        an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the 
        same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act in- cludes the willful doing of it. 
        Malice includes intent and will. State v. Bobbins. 06 Me. 328. For other definitions see 
        Shannon v. Jones, 70 Tex. 141. 13 S. W. 477; Williams v. Williams. 20 Colo. 51. 37 Pac. 
        014; Smith v. Railroad Co., 87 Md. 48. 3S Atl. 1072; In re Freche (D. C.) 109 Fed. 621 ; 
        Craft v. State, 3 Kan. 486; Lewis v. Chapman. 10 N. Y. 309; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475.
         21 S. W. 193; State v. Witt. 34 Kan. 488. 8 Pac. 709; State v. Walker, 9 Houst. tDel.) 
        404, 33 Atl. 227; Cotton v. State. 32 Tex. 014; Com. v. Chance, 174 Mass. 245. 54 N. E. 551.
        75 Am. St. Rep. 306. In the law of libel and slander. An evil intent or motive arising from spite
         or ill will; personal hatred or ill will; culpable recklessness or a willful and wanton disregard 
        of the rights and interests of the per- ) MALICE son defamed. McDonald v. Brown, 
        23 R. I. 546, 51 Atl. 213, 58 L. R. A. 768, 91 Am. St. Rep. 659; Hearne v. De Young, 
        132 Cal. 357, 64 Pac. 576; Cherry v. Des Moines Leader, 114 Iowa, 298, 86 N. W. 323, 
        54 L R. A. 855, 89 Am. St. Rep. 365; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 73 S. W. 668

        TLD Example: The defense attorney successfully proved to the jury that his client acted
         without malice when he broke into the vacant cabin to escape the snow and freezing temperatures.


        I posted my one and only 10/2017 innocent target shoot to my youtube channel in 1/2018. I do not own a gun and I never have. I did not have any record or arrests prior to Belfast Chief McFadden's fabricated charges and arrests beginning in 9/2017.  I did not post this target shoot anywhere or send it to anyone. It was just for me on my playlist John & Me. Belfast Police Chief Mike Mcfadden stalks my youtube, found it and sent it out globally. He incites terror not me. I was illegally arrested on 2/23/18, 7 days in jail where I was not to live. I did. Dismiss, this is freedom of speech and legal under the First Amendment. 



        First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever. @ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot. I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will. @1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. 

        John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said. @2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright. @3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. 

        I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye. 
          

        @3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "

        John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.) I did it. I did it. 9 9 9. I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some."

        @6:11 I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marhsall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me.John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.) 

        Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl? He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear with these little peanuts. Alright bye."


        Laurie Allen
        17 Seaview Terrace
        Belfast, Me. 04915

        From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
        Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 12:13 PM
        To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
        Subject: 3rd req Dismissal Motions Harassment

        1. I was never given any cease harassment notices with my original signature as mandated on the form. Bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed at the Waldo Jail on 11/1/2017 when he took my bail money and I told him that I did not receive the notices. He confirmed that they were not on my personal belongings list and told the officers. They responded that I would be getting copies. Otis left and the officers never gave copies either. I don't even know what this arrest was for and still don't as of 6/10/2019 nor do I know what the 2nd harassment charge is. I continue to ask for these original notices. I went to the Belfast Police Department in 11/2017 and Officer Guba told me I would not be getting any original signed notices. I told Judge Mathews at the 12/8/2017 hearing for the 1rst harassment charge and at every hearing since. 
        2. Belfast Police Chief McFadden and Officer Rolerson refused my repeated requests for a cease harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace, Rae/Cameron Trust, Mark Rae, family and workers from 5/2017-9/2017 with video proof and Officer Rolerson protecting them. 

          July 20
          17 Mark Rae threatens to throw my personal property off of my property. Mark lies stating he has had it surveyed and fails to produce it in Court where Judge Sparaco issued me a protection order against Mark Rae 5/2018. After first minute there is nothing, just waiting for police.

          July 2017  Officer Rolerson responds and agrees it's a civil matter, no jurisdiction for police, threatens me that it could be a criminal matter.   Kayla LaCombe states a new survey line. They don't have a survey. Rolerson protects them.
          https://youtu.be/DEuvPBIR5Ws                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        2017  @ 3:08 Mark Rae threatens that if I don't move my boat by tomorrow morning, he is taking it. https://youtu.be/oOPXGgKgBrE                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                      2017 Kayla Lacombe (grandaughter to BO Cameron) trespassing and throwing my personal property

          2017 Mark Rae mauls my boat, slices my boot lock, slices the air valve off my tire, straps a bungee cord to try and get boot lock off, leaves permanent tar boot prints on the deck of my boat. Officer Juba does nothing. I ask for a cease harassment again. @ 1:33 I see for the first time that Mark Rae destroyed my tire. I hadn't noticed it with all the other destruction he did. Lots of f cursing. Venting verbally. For 7 years while protesting and attending City Hall meetings, I did not curse. All these men and a few women coming after me made me lower myself. No more.

          First and ONLY Criminal Trespass Notice by Officer (Sargent ?) Gibbs to set up another arrest.

          6/26/18 where he states it means nothing until violated, ie I trespass onto my property that 23 Seaview Terrace, Cameron/Rae family keeps trying to take, illegally with government support.



          9/13/18 Officer Richards calls Sgt. Gibbs and is advised to arrest me for criminal trespass as I am parked in the City right of way on my property. I show Richards the survey and original plans with original boundaries of Seaview Terrace, 1966. No boundary changes or sub divides have been done on Seaview Terrace per City Planner, Wayne Marshall 2012. I move my SUV @ 6:35




          10/30/18 Mark Rae trespassing, destroying my property with front loader regardless of protection order from Judge Sparaco.

        3. From: Michael McFadden <chief@belfastmepd.org>
          Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:51 AM
          To: LAURIE ALLEN; ward3councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward4councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward5@cityofbelfast.org; ward2councilor@cityofbelfast.org; ward1councilor@cityofbelfast.org; mayor@cityofbelfast.org
          Cc: Gregory Stearns; Jeffrey Trafton; Governor; robert.a.williams@maine.gov
          Subject: RE: Cease Harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace

          Ms. Allen,

          Over the past couple months there have been several complaints generated by you and/or your neighbors regarding a boundary line dispute. The Belfast Police  Department has responded to every one of the calls for service made by you and/or your neighbors. As with most if not all boundary line disputes the actual situation cannot be resolved by the police due to the fact that we have no authority over boundary lines. This has been explained to both you and your neighbors. The officers have given sound advice as to how both parties need to proceed in order to come to a resolution on this issue.

          As far as your repeated requests to have your neighbors issued harassment notices along with the real estate agents who sold the property, I would explain that the Belfast Police Department does have the authority to issue harassment notices, however we do so if/when we're able to determine harassing conduct is present. I have reviewed the videos you've posted to your YouTube channel regarding the alleged harassing behavior and find no behavior on your neighbors part that would justify a harassment notice being served on them.

          I have not responded to your repeated emails until now due to the fact that you seem to ignore what I say and simply make another identical demand to have a harassment notice served on your neighbors.

          As I've said before, at this time the Belfast Police Department will not be issuing a harassment notice on anyone based on the information you provided. I will say that should you provide us with information that justifies a harassment notice be served we will most certainly follow through with that function.

          Thank you for your understanding.
          Chief McFadden.
        4. On 9/7/2017 Chief McFadden offered 23 Seaview Terrace a cease harassment against me without any proof and I was issued notice but not given the original notice that I asked for and continue to ask for.
        5. On 10/23/17 Officer Guba served me a summons for a violation of the 9/7/2017 cease harassment on 10/17/17 per a video taken by worker Kevin Page that is not available but is "clearly" my voice harassing Mark Rae. This did not happen. The court hearing was for 12/8/17. Here is video of Kevin Page harassing and scaring me and the protection order against Mark Rae granted to me by Judge Sparaco 5/2018 and upheld by the Maine Supreme Court.
        6. On 11/1/2017 the K9 unit and another Belfast PD Crusier came to my home in the evening and arrested me (edit- As of 6/10/2019, I still don't know what this arrest was for.) This was the last arrest before 2/23/18 where I was falsely arrested and charged with terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.
        7. There is hope. The Maine Supreme Court upheld my protection order against Mark Rae.

              8. Kevin Page, (ADA Entwisle states in his harassment discovery that I was arrested on 11/1/2017 for harassment to Rae/Cameron Living Trust 23 Seaview Terrace from a video taken by Kevin Page but cannot be produced but is clearly my voice) Kevin Page taunts me, calls me a crazy bitch and curses at me , to my face. Violating their own cease harassment. Scary and unstable.  


        https://youtu.be/dDLVg6ftsRI 

        Kevin Page from Swanville? There's a Karen Page, asst. Waldo County Judiciary Court Clerk- relation? Court Clerk Brooke Otis to Waldo Bailiff Ryan Otis- relation? All In The Family. JustUs.
             9. Another short video on 1/8/2018  with Rae's worker, Kevin Page cursing at me with fuck and calling me a retard while shoveling snow onto my property.  https://youtu.be/bGkl9cEx1so

        Laurie Allen

        6/9/2019 4:30 pm
        Below are 6/7 & 6/8/emails to Governor Trafton Mills, Sheriff Trafton, Chief McFadden and Maine AG Frey (see #2) and my court appointed attorney Tom Shehan (see #1) pressing him to write up motions for dismissal of all charges- 2 harassment and 1 terrorizing with a dangerous weapon for the dispositional hearing on Tuesday, 6/11/2019 @ 10:30 am. He has yet to respond and I fear he will not do this. Next would be a trial that is not necessary but what the State and Belfast enforcers want to silence me and continue their corruption. Furthermore my pretrial case manager Rick Otto is not responding to my phone calls or emails to make sure I have permission to go to the courthouse because the entire downtown Belfast is restricted for me, even the City Park, right across the street from me. Mean, mean, mean. I have to do a bail check in with him everyday between 5-11pm, I text him and copy my attorney as well. For insurance that I don't get falsely arrested again. This is all so very sick. Belfast is the mental health hub for MaineHealth. Oy veh. They can't break me, I know these tactics well.
        https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/communication-success/201704/7-stages-gaslighting-in-relationship
         4. Wear Out the Victim. By staying on the offensive, the gaslighter eventually wears down their victim, who becomes discouraged, resigned, pessimistic, fearful, debilitated, and self-doubting. The victim begins to question her or his own perception, identity, and reality.

        #1.
        From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
        Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 8:07 PM
        To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
        Subject: And Tom email for 9/7/17 CH Fw: 453rd day shackling Mom 1rst Amnd Innocent
        Tom,
        Please tell me what the 2nd Cease Harassment charge and evidence is that I was arrested for on 11/1/2017. I have asked you this in the 6/6 email and the 5/30 email (both pasted below) and that is why I wrote "These pages you sent are useless information. You can't even find the 2nd CH charge information and evidence. Dismiss. This is so stupid."Please answer. 

        On Thursday, June 6, 2019, 6:41:01 PM EDT, LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com> wrote:

        Tom,

        The November 1, 2017 charge is for what? I don't see any report in the discovery stating the event and evidence- do you? (6/7/2019 7:15 pm edit-this part  is wrong, I don't even know what I was arrested for on 11/1/2017 That is the night they arrested me for the first one on a video that is not available.) I told you that when they brought me into the jail they had me sign a slew of cease harassment charges from Belfast PD, Belfast City Hall, Mike Hurley and his theater. Then they told me that I had violated the Mike Hurley one where I had just signed it and got a 2nd arrest that night. They never gave me the notices and Bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed that I did not get them.
        Now none of those are on record and this one is new with this discovery. All these hearings and the charges were never presented by ADA Entwisle. 

        On Thursday, May 30, 2019, 9:08:54 AM EDT, LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com> wrote:

        Tom,

        It appears that all that is needed for complete dismissal of all charges,2 harassment and one terrorizing with a dangerous weapon is in #1 and #2 of this email. The rest of the thread is more proof as is the other documents that I have given you but they are not necessary. 

        Please advise before the dispositional conference on 6/11/2019. I have yet to receive that notice. There is no reason for this to go to trial, correct?

        1. Dismiss 2 Harassment Charges. I don't even know what the 2nd one is. Please identify this 2nd charge with the evidence. The first charge states I harassed Mark Rae per a video that is not available. Furthermore, dismissal should be automatic since I was never given my original signed cease harassment notice as mandated on the form. I've been reporting this to the Waldo Jail officers, bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed non receipt of notices on 11/1/2017 confirming that the notices were not on my personal belongings list and questioned the officers. They said they were getting me copies. A lie. I have been reporting the same to the courts (video's and transcripts available) since the December 2017. Belfast Chief McFadden ignored email requests and after I got permission to go to the police department (I am restricted from the entire downtown) the window clerk could not find the notices on her computer. Officer Guba came out and told me that I would not be getting the original notices. He had other papers that I did not accept or take. 

        2. Dismiss terrorizing with a dangerous weapon. Belfast Police Chief McFadden went into my you tube account and sent out my 10/2017 innocent freedom of expression target shoot video. I did not send this video to anyone and I did not post this video anywhere, including my blogs until after McFadden sent it out globally with the AP media. According to the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution my target shoot video posted to my you tube account is legal.


        From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
        Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 10:36 AM
        To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
        Subject: Re: Dismiss All Charges Re: Harvard Law/Malice

        Tom,

        Per the discovery, I violated this 9/7/2017 cease harassment notice per a video taken by Kevin Page that is not available. However I haven given you video of Kevin Page harassing and terrorizing me in the email that I sent to Governor Mills, Chief McFadden, Sheriff Trafton and AG Frey that is included in this thread along with my 10:36 am email from today, 6/7/2019 asking you to motion for dismissal of all charges. I have yet to read your emails of motions filed with the court. It appeared to be just for the ankle monitor and zone restrictions. If so, please do the motions for dismissal of all charges per non receipt of original signed notices and the Harvard law 1rst amendment and malice definition proving my private video is legal. Advise if you will not use this and/or will not write up the dismissal motions and reasons.

        You should have received my email to Gov. Mills, Sheriff Trafton, Chief McFadden and AG Frey. Please write up the motion to dismiss all charges of at least refusal to give me original signed notices as mandated proving falsifying and !rst Amendment rights and that McFadden sent out the video to incite terror and another false arrest....

        McFadden refused to respond to the cease harassment notice that I formally filed in the BPD on 9/1/2017 after he refused to respond to my emails and face to face with Officer Rolerson on my property for a cease harassment against Rae/Cameron/family, workers on 23 Seaview Terrace. He finally responded that he would not be issuing a CH based on the proof and instead offered one to them.

        From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
        Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 4:09 PM
        To: LAURIE ALLEN; Michael McFadden
        Cc: same as above
        Subject: Per attached 6 months of terror, issue Cease Harassment Notice/All & Agent 23 Seaview Terrace
        Belfast Police Chief Mike McFadden,

        Per the attached frightening terrorism that you support and encourage, please issue a cease harassment notice against all owners (Rae Trust and such) against 23 Seaview Terrace, Belfast Maine, 04915. Please copy and email me the notice that I have been begging for 6 months and counting. Please respond by 5pm today.

        Sincerely,

        Laurie Allen

        LAURIE ALLEN
         
        Thu 9/7/2017 4:43 PM
          
        •  attorney.general@maine.gov;
        •   
        •  LAURIE ALLEN

          
        •  glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com
          

        Maine Attorney General Janet Mills,

        Terrorizing below, I was just served with a cease harassment order by 2 cars of the Belfast Police against the owners of 23 Seaview Terrace, Belfast. If I do not receive a response from you by 5:30 pm, 9/7/17 I will take actions.

        Laurie Allen
        #2
        From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
        Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 9:28 AM
        To: LAURIE ALLEN; Governor; chief@belfastmepd.org; Jeffrey Trafton; Thomas Shehan; georgeallen99; attorney.general@maine.gov
        Cc: comments@mainepublic.org; glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com; ethankingcole@gmail.com; einstein@toast.net; haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk; humblefarmer@midcoast.com; aobrien@freepressonline.com; wabi@wabi.tv; mstewart@ap.org; news@pressherald.com; news@villagesoup.com; news@penbaypilot.com; Senator Susan Collins; erin.herbig@legislature.maine.gov; scheduling_king@king.senate.gov; mayor@cityofbelfast.org
        Subject: 453rd day shackling Mom 1rst Amnd Innocent

        Governor Janet Trafton Mills, Waldo County Sheriff Jeffrey Trafton,  Belfast Chief Michael McFadden, and Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey, 

        The State of Maine continues to keep me, Laurie Allen, a 58 year old, single, below poverty level (18k), Mom shackled for the 453rd day. The State of Maine charges me $5 a day for this shackle invading my health and privacy of my home that I rarely leave. The zoning restrictions are barbaric. I have never had a record. I have never been arrested prior to the beginning of fabricated harassment charges after 9/5/2017 by Chief McFadden. Chief McFadden's final refusal to grant me protection through a cease harassment against 23 Seaview Terrace, Mark Rae, family and workers for numerous crimes and terrorizing since May 2017 with overwhelming video documentation. However, Judge Susan Sparaco granted me a protection order from Mark Rae in 5/2018 with evidence, survey and original plans proving my property lines where Mark Rae did not have a survey as claimed, Mark Rae's theft of my property where Chief McFadden ignored repeated requests to take my report of Mark Rae's theft with picture proof. Mark Rae appealed to the Maine Supreme Court to overturn my pro se protection order. Rae was denied. 
        (below is a portion of proof from my blog)

        There is hope. The Maine Supreme Court upheld my protection order against Mark Rae.

        Here,  Kevin Page, (ADA Entwisle states in his harassment discovery that I was arrested on 11/1/2017 for harassment to Rae/Cameron Living Trust 23 Seaview Terrace from a video taken by Kevin Page but cannot be produced but is clearly my voice) Kevin Page taunts me, calls me a crazy bitch and curses at me , to my face. Violating their own cease harassment. Scary and unstable.  


        https://youtu.be/dDLVg6ftsRI 

        Kevin Page from Swanville? There's a Karen Page, asst. Waldo County Judiciary Court Clerk- relation? Court Clerk Brooke Otis to Waldo Bailiff Ryan Otis- relation? All In The Family. JustUs.

        Here's another short video on 1/8/2018  with Rae's worker, Kevin Page cursing at me with fuck and calling me a retard while shoveling snow onto my property.  https://youtu.be/bGkl9cEx1so


        (end of blog portion)

        Chief McFadden offered them illegal cease harassment against me and then fabricated charges and fabricated evidence that is not available per ADA Entwisle's discovery. Chief McFadden continues with his power to stalk my youtube channel and to fabricate another arrest (3rd) on 2/23/2018 and arresting me for terrorizing with a dangerous weapon for a legal freedom of speech October 2017 target shoot per the first amendment cited below without malice. I did not sent this video to anyone or post it anywhere except on my playlist for John and Me. I have other playlists for corruption, Chief McFadden sent the video to the global media with lies from City Manager Joe Slocum and others to persecute me on 2/23/18. I read that downtown Belfast had a social media party upon my arrest. The comments were horrendous.


        Bail was set at 25k . All know I did not have 25k and ordered that outrageous amount to place me into jail for 7 days. The bail was reduced to 5k (I am sure no one knew that I did have 5k) and Waldo Jail would not take the bail payment from my friend in person on Weds. 2/28, Thrs. 3/1, or Fri., 3/2. On Friday morning, 3/2 as my friend was trying to pay the 5k bail without success, the transport officer walked passed him and told him that he was going to get me out of Two Bridges Correctional Facility now. The Waldo jail had yet to take the bail. I have been brutally shackled and restricted since 3/2/18 as rapists go free.

        I've yet to hear the 3 charges in court after numerous dispositional conferences as pro se since the first hearing with Judge Mathews on 12/8/2017 where I was not allowed to be heard for dismissal, pushed into dispostional conferences galore and getting nowhere. At every hearing Judge Robert Murray, Judge Mathews, and Judge Fowle telling me to get an attorney, these are serious charges. Yes they are and false.

         This has forced me into taking a court appointed attorney, Tom Shehan. I have another dispositional conference, Tuesday, 6/11/2019 @ 10:30am where all 3 charges should finally be dismissed. Continuing this fabrication into a trial is an enormous injustice and cost. If that is the course, I request a trial by Judge only and for bail and restrictions to be rescinded immediately.

        Rick Otto, my pretrial case manager and Sheriff Trafton have yet to respond to my 6/5 email to grant permission to travel into the restricted entire downtown zone for my 6/11/2019 hearing @ the Waldo Judiciary Center. Without email written permission (received from Rick Otto for previous hearings) I could be arrested again. Please have Rick Otto or Sheriff Trafton respond to my email request.

        Truly Innocent,
        Laurie Allen
        17 Seaview Terrace
        Belfast, Maine 04915

        Below is included in this email to Governor Trafton Mills, AG Frey, Sheriff Trafton and Chief McFadden
        (Maine Public Broadcasting Network VP/Content Charles Beck is my neighbor. I would welcome an interview from MPBN or any media and would think shackling a law abiding American woman to break and demoralize for even one day is news, 453 days is deadly for me. My father @56, sister @54 and 2 brothers @ 65 & 67 ALL died from cancer. This gps cancer cell tracker on my skin is cancerous. )


        https://bangordailynews.com/2011/12/20/news/midcoast/new-belfast-police-chief-selected/
        New Belfast police chief selected
        By Abigail Curtis, BDN Staff
        Posted Dec. 20, 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
        Belfast native Michael McFadden III, who worked for the Belfast Police Department for 19 years before joining the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit.McFadden, who joined the Computer Crimes Unit two yeas ago, is well-placed to do that, Slocum said.While there, the former Belfast Police Department detective investigatedI nternet pornography cases.

        PeterTaber 

        A sad choice. This knuckle-dragging thug doesn't have any trouble lying shamelessly if hethinks it might gain a conviction. His father, a longtime Belfast police officer who merited wide respect, must be spinning in his grave at how his son turned out. Of course, take this opinion as you might.I was only a police reporter for over 40 years, can hardly be called a cop-hater, and yet I witnessed first-hand how low-down he has behaved.

        maine_seashore 

        He physically beats false confessions out of people being arrested...just ask Mike Hall ;)

        Peter Taber, now activist and owner of https://searsportshores.com/


        (My attorney should be advising me. There may be even more law on my side but how would I know?)

        From: LAURIE ALLEN <laurieallen55@msn.com>
        Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:08 AM
        To: Thomas Shehan; LAURIE ALLEN
        Subject: Dismiss All Charges Re: Harvard Law/Malice

        Tom,

        It appears that all that is needed for complete dismissal of all charges,2 harassment and one terrorizing with a dangerous weapon is in #1 and #2 of this email. The rest of the thread is more proof as is the other documents that I have given you but they are not necessary. 

        Please advise before the dispositional conference on 6/11/2019. I have yet to receive that notice. There is no reason for this to go to trial, correct?

        1. Dismiss 2 Harassment Charges. I don't even know what the 2nd one is. Please identify this 2nd charge with the evidence. The first charge states I harassed Mark Rae per a video that is not available. Furthermore, dismissal should be automatic since I was never given my original signed cease harassment notice as mandated on the form. I've been reporting this to the Waldo Jail officers, bailiff Ryan Otis witnessed non receipt of notices on 11/1/2017 confirming that the notices were not on my personal belongings list and questioned the officers. They said they were getting me copies. A lie. I have been reporting the same to the courts (video's and transcripts available) since the December 2017. Belfast Chief McFadden ignored email requests and after I got permission to go to the police department (I am restricted from the entire downtown) the window clerk could not find the notices on her computer. Officer Guba came out and told me that I would not be getting the original notices. He had other papers that I did not accept or take. 

        2. Dismiss terrorizing with a dangerous weapon.Belfast Police Chief McFadden went into my you tube account and sent out my 10/2017 innocent freedom of expression target shoot video. I did not send this video to anyone and I did not post this video anywhere, including my blogs until after McFadden sent it out globally with the AP media. According to the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution my target shoot video posted to my you tube account is legal.


        Before plunging into the details of the proliferating controversies over freedom of expression on the Internet, you need some background information on two topics. The first and more obvious is the Free-Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 

        The relevance and authority of the First Amendment should not be exaggerated; as several observers have remarked, "on the Internet, the First Amendment is just a local ordinance." 
        However, free-expression controversies that arise in the United States inevitably implicate the Constitution. And the arguments deployed in the course of American First-Amendment fights often inform or infect the handling of free-expression controversies in other countries. The upshot: First-Amendment jurisprudence is worth studying.

        Unfortunately, that jurisprudence is large and arcane. The relevant constitutional provision is simple enough: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . .." But the case law that, over the course of the twentieth century, has been built upon this foundation is complex. An extremely abbreviated outline of the principal doctrines would go as follows:

        If a law gives no clear notice of the kind of speech it prohibits, it’s "void for vagueness."

        If a law burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to advance a compelling government interest, it’s unconstitutionally "overbroad."

        A government may not force a person to endorse any symbol, slogan, or pledge.

        Governmental restrictions on the "time, place, and manner" in which speech is permitted are constitutional if and only if:

        they are "content neutral," both on their face and as applied;

        they leave substantial other opportunities for speech to take place; and

        they "narrowly serve a significant state interest."

        On state-owned property that does not constitute a "public forum," government may restrict speech in any way that is reasonable in light of the nature and purpose of the property in question.

        Content-based governmental restrictions on speech are unconstitutional unless they advance a "compelling state interest." To this principle, there are six exceptions:


        1. Speech that is likely to lead to imminent lawless action may be prohibited.

        2. "Fighting words" -- i.e., words so insulting that people are likely to fight back -- may be prohibited. 

        3. Obscenity -- i.e., erotic expression, grossly or patently offensive to an average person, that lacks serious artistic or social value -- may be prohibited. 

        4. Child pornography may be banned whether or not it is legally obscene and whether or not it has serious artistic or social value, because it induces people to engage in lewd displays, and the creation of it threatens the welfare of children. 

        5. Defamatory statements may be prohibited. (In other words, the making of such statements may constitutionally give rise to civil liability.) However,  if the target of the defamation is a "public figure," she must prove that the defendant acted with "malice." 
        If the target is not a "public figure" but the statement involved a matter of "public concern,"
        the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted with negligence concerning its falsity. 

        6. Commercial Speech may be banned only if it is misleading, pertains to illegal products, or 
        directly advances a substantial state interest with a degree of suppression no greater than is 
        reasonably necessary.


        What is MALICE?

        In criminal law. In its legal sense, this word does not simply mean ill will against a person, but signifies a wrongful act done intentionally, without just cause or excuse. Bromage v. Prosser, 4 Barn. & C. 255. A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person. About as clear, comprehensive, and correct a definition as the authorities afford is that “malice is a condition of the mind which shows a heart regardless of social duty and fatally bent on mischief, the existence of which is inferred from acts committed or words spoken.” Harris v. State, 8 Tex. App. 109. “Malice,” in its common acceptation, means ill will towards some person. In its legal sense, it applies to a wrongful act done intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. Dunn v. Hall, 1 Ind. 344. A man may do an act willfully, and yet be free of malice. But he cannot do an act maliciously without at the same time doing it willfully. The malicious doing of an act includes the willful doing of it. Malice includes intent and will. State v. Bobbins. 06 Me. 328. For other definitions see Shannon v. Jones, 70 Tex. 141. 13 S. W. 477; Williams v. Williams. 20 Colo. 51. 37 Pac. 014; Smith v. Railroad Co., 87 Md. 48. 3S Atl. 1072; In re Freche (D. C.) 109 Fed. 621 ; Craft v. State, 3 Kan. 486; Lewis v. Chapman. 10 N. Y. 309; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475.21 S. W. 193; State v. Witt. 34 Kan. 488. 8 Pac. 709; State v. Walker, 9 Houst. tDel.) 404, 33 Atl. 227; Cotton v. State. 32 Tex. 014; Com. v. Chance, 174 Mass. 245. 54 N. E. 551.75 Am. St. Rep. 306. In the law of libel and slander. An evil intent or motive arising from spite or ill will; personal hatred or ill will; culpable recklessness or a willful and wanton disregard of the rights and interests of the per- ) MALICE son defamed. McDonald v. Brown, 23 R. I. 546, 51 Atl. 213, 58 L. R. A. 768, 91 Am. St. Rep. 659; Hearne v. De Young, 132 Cal. 357, 64 Pac. 576; Cherry v. Des Moines Leader, 114 Iowa, 298, 86 N. W. 323, 54 L R. A. 855, 89 Am. St. Rep. 365; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 73 S. W. 668
        TLD Example: The defense attorney successfully proved to the jury that his client acted without malice when he broke into the vacant cabin to escape the snow and freezing temperatures. 

        10/2017 Target Shoot You tube video
        https://youtu.be/XrIOrl3qStw

        First few seconds I say "Joi Z's turn. I never shot before. I was good in archery though, in camp. When I was 8 or 7, whatever. 
        @ 1 minute John asks me if I want to shoot that target or just shoot.I tell him he doesn't have to fix it (the target) I'm not gonna hit anything. He says yes you will. 
        @1:43 I say I wanna shoot the target. HEY, I wanna shoot the target. Let me have fun. John says let me fix it. Stop. I say it ain't on red, we're good. John mumbles something. I say yeah that's what he said. 
        @2:50 John says you're good to go baby. I say alright. 
        @3:20 John says you're ready to roll. You have 9 shots. I'm having a hard time seeing the target through the scope. Later John would tell me because the scope is for his dominant eye vision, it's his rifle. I don't have dominant eye. 

        The lying Republican Journal/Waldo Village Soup and the DA at court hearings made a big deal about being a "High powered scoped rifle" trying to use the 9 shots as me planning 9 shots for each of the officials. 

        @3:59 I finally shoot one and say "oh this is nice. What I'd get. (NOT WHO) Let's go look. Safety on. Oh that's fun. That's nothing. It's a little weinie gun for Laurie. I like it. And little bullets. "
        John says You got it. I say "oh f*** yeah. I'm good too. Didn't ya know that." John is telling me it's automatic and I say "yeah it's automatic, just like me. It's not even that loud either. I don't need these plugs. Alright, I'm set. Ohhh, this is cool. I don't even need that stand. Done. I'm done. (meaning done shooting period. I did it and did not want to shoot again.)" I did it. I did it. 9 9 9.I'm gonna bring the camera over. John's gonna point out. I hit some." I did not even mention their names, I was just shooting the target. I said it after, it certainly was innocent. Not even premeditated. Just stupid banter.

        @6:11I say "F*****' Miss Piggy Mortier, Mike Hurley, Sanders, Harkness, Arrison, Slocum, Marshall, blah, blah, blah Thanks for being my target ya assholes."John says Look, ya shot it all full of holes. I say"I shot it all full of holes. And I ain't got no gun. This is John's. Don't shoot me." John counts 6 shots in the target area and says pretty good. I say "pretty good. I got em all on there. All 9 right?" John says yes, nice group. Not bad for your first try. I say "not at all. Watch your ass buddy" (meaning John because he is a sharp shooter. They edited this part to the media to make it seem like I was saying watch your ass to City Council.) 

        Then John walks away and I follow him with the camera and I say "I'll watch your ass. Go ahead keep on walking. Look at that dupka. Oh Johnny- who's your girl? Who's your girl?He's acting like he can't hear me. It's bullshit. Look at these little things. Tell me you can't hear 
        with these little peanuts. Alright bye."


        Truly Innocent,
        Laurie Allen
        6/7/2019

        End of email sent to Governor Mills, Sheriff Trafton, Chief McFadden and AG Frey.

        5/30/2019 - Peter Taber and maine seashore comments to this 2011 new article naming Detective Mr. Internet Porn, Mike McFadden, Belfast Chief of Police. McFadden and implicated are serially deadly. I know. All the Chief's horses and all the Chief's men couldn't break Little Laurie Allen, eight years and counting.Belfast TWC now Spectrum home invader tech, In 2012, Tom showed me a you tube video of a hand dipping a rusted metal piece from an antique tractor mower into a homemade chemical vat and pulling it out shiny and looking new. He said this was his brother-in-law and in his garage. A few weeks later in the fall of 2012, Chief McFadden was talking to me and told me that he restores antique tractor mowers in his garage. He turned white and almost fell off his chair when I said- hey you are the brother in law to Tom, he just showed me your video.

         Belfast resident, Brad Williams had approached me several times in 2012 with a map that he claims is McFadden's bone cemetery  containing the bones of his guitar student, Jeremy Alex of Northport. I didn't put the vat, McFadden's reaction that I saw his video and Brad's story together until 2 years ago. I am typing the comments below from the article below that. McFadden hacks my computer, has keys to my house, safe boxes are missing and key documents are a few of the missing from 1/8/2019-3/8/2019. McFadden was in my house during that time period when I was not there. I always feel like somebody's watching me.... Right. Serially ill.

        Peter Taber, now activist and owner of https://searsportshores.com/ comment "A sad choice. This knuckle-dragging thug doesn't have any trouble lying shamelessly if he thinks it might gain a conviction. His father, a longtime Belfast police officer who merited wide respect, must be spinning in his grave at how his son turned out. Of course, take this opinion as you might. I was only a police reporter for over 40 years, can hardly be called a cop-hater, and yet I witnessed first-hand how low-down he has behaved.

        maine seashore comment "He physically bears false confessions out of people being arrested... just ask Mike Hall ;)"


        https://bangordailynews.com/2011/12/20/news/midcoast/new-belfast-police-chief-selected/
        New Belfast police chief selected
        By Abigail Curtis, BDN Staff
        Posted Dec. 20, 2011, at 4:08 p.m.
        Belfast native Michael McFadden III, who worked for the Belfast Police Department for 19 
        years before joining the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit.McFadden, who joined the Computer Crimes Unit two yeas ago, is well-placed to do that, Slocum said.While there, the former Belfast Police Department detective investigatedI nternet pornography cases.

        PeterTaber

        A sad choice. This knuckle-dragging thug doesn't have any trouble lying shamelessly if he
        thinks it might gain a conviction. His father, a longtime Belfast police officer who merited
        wide respect, must be spinning in his grave at how his son turned out. Of course, take this
        opinion as you might.I was only a police reporter for over 40 years, can hardly be called a
        cop-hater, and yet I witnessed first-hand how low-down he has behaved.


        maine_seashore

        He physically beats false confessions out of people being arrested...just ask Mike Hall ;)